Imagine thinking they’re actually anarchists😂. Troons are heavily religious and heavily authoritarian. Also, fun fact, Hitler, like many others, didn’t believe in the divinity of Christ, he was about as Christian as a Jew.
Hitler, like many others, didn’t believe in the divinity of Christ
"I SAY: MY FEELING AS A CHRISTIAN POINTS ME TO MY LORD AND SAVIOUR AS A FIGHTER. IT POINTS ME TO THE MAN WHO ONCE IN LONELINESS, SURROUNDED ONLY BY A FEW FOLLOWERS, RECOGNIZED THESE JEWS FOR WHAT THEY WERE AND SUMMONED MEN TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THEM AND WHO, GOD'S TRUTH! WAS GREATEST NOT AS SUFFERER BUT AS FIGHTER.
In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before - the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross"
Not the person you were responding to, so I'll only address the first part.
Yes, troons are extremely religious. They rabidly believe in leftism, viciously defend it even when it's contradicted by facts or logic, attack everyone they consider heretics or apostates to their doctrine, and blindly follow the Word of their religious thought leaders every time new commandments are dictated, even when these new marching orders directly oppose previous directives.
If that is not a religious zealot, then I don't know what is.
That said, in 1937, Hans Kerrl, the Reich Minister for Church Affairs, explained that "Positive Christianity" was not "dependent upon the Apostle's Creed", nor was it dependent on "faith in Christ as the son of God", upon which Christianity relied; rather, it was represented by the Nazi Party: "The Führer is the herald of a new revelation", he said.
"I SAY: MY FEELING AS A CHRISTIAN POINTS ME TO MY LORD AND SAVIOUR AS A FIGHTER. IT POINTS ME TO THE MAN WHO ONCE IN LONELINESS, SURROUNDED ONLY BY A FEW FOLLOWERS, RECOGNIZED THESE JEWS FOR WHAT THEY WERE AND SUMMONED MEN TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THEM AND WHO, GOD'S TRUTH! WAS GREATEST NOT AS SUFFERER BUT AS FIGHTER.
Amazing that a guy running for office in a country that was 95% Christian at the time would speak words in favor of Christianity. Of course, he said different things in private.
And of course, this makes little sense. Hitler didn't like Jews who had converted to Christianity either. So how can he cite those "followers" of Jesus as examples? They were ethnically Jewish, after all, like Jesus himself.
Puritanism as used is a broader term, not specifically about the christian denomination. And authoritarianism is leftism, it is what the troons act in service of - using government force to compel behavior.
Puritanism as used is a broader term, not specifically about the christian denomination
Well, it was a slur from the very beginning, so you're right about that. And Puritans were actually quite nice and forgiving people... mostly.
using government force to compel behavior.
Is there a difference between using government force to impose gay pornography and transgender grooming on children vs. using government force to protect them from it?
what the fuck do troon wanna-be anarchists have to do with puritanism and authoritarianism?
you really think your enemy is modest Christian Hitler?
Imagine thinking they’re actually anarchists😂. Troons are heavily religious and heavily authoritarian. Also, fun fact, Hitler, like many others, didn’t believe in the divinity of Christ, he was about as Christian as a Jew.
buh
"I SAY: MY FEELING AS A CHRISTIAN POINTS ME TO MY LORD AND SAVIOUR AS A FIGHTER. IT POINTS ME TO THE MAN WHO ONCE IN LONELINESS, SURROUNDED ONLY BY A FEW FOLLOWERS, RECOGNIZED THESE JEWS FOR WHAT THEY WERE AND SUMMONED MEN TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THEM AND WHO, GOD'S TRUTH! WAS GREATEST NOT AS SUFFERER BUT AS FIGHTER.
In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before - the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross"
Not the person you were responding to, so I'll only address the first part.
Yes, troons are extremely religious. They rabidly believe in leftism, viciously defend it even when it's contradicted by facts or logic, attack everyone they consider heretics or apostates to their doctrine, and blindly follow the Word of their religious thought leaders every time new commandments are dictated, even when these new marching orders directly oppose previous directives.
If that is not a religious zealot, then I don't know what is.
Amazing that a guy running for office in a country that was 95% Christian at the time would speak words in favor of Christianity. Of course, he said different things in private.
And of course, this makes little sense. Hitler didn't like Jews who had converted to Christianity either. So how can he cite those "followers" of Jesus as examples? They were ethnically Jewish, after all, like Jesus himself.
Now you've done it, mentioning the glorious Führer in the same sentence as 'Jew'. RIP poor Ahaus.
Puritanism as used is a broader term, not specifically about the christian denomination. And authoritarianism is leftism, it is what the troons act in service of - using government force to compel behavior.
if you broaden it so much that it applies to literal hedonists then it has lost all meaning.
When used in broader terms, it is in reference of the purity spiral, not the morality of whatever they are spiraling over.
The slang use is referring to social authoritarianism.
Well, it was a slur from the very beginning, so you're right about that. And Puritans were actually quite nice and forgiving people... mostly.
Is there a difference between using government force to impose gay pornography and transgender grooming on children vs. using government force to protect them from it?
Preferably the parents would be involved first, and government would only be involved at lowest levels starting with actual criminal behavior.
You answered your own question. They "wanna be" anarchists but they were always puritans and authoritarians.