Women think they will be superheroes that save the country
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
Interesting she does not plan on fighting but to "coordinate", such a leftist woman thing to say
War brides and rape slaves are a kind of coordination, I guess.
Notice she doesn't say fighting at all, they are coordinating to "sort things out." Its a Lysistrata gambit where they intend the nag and deny sex long enough to force men to do their bidding. Like an HR department but for the world. The "combat trousers" are just her falling back to old feminist talking points about putting on pants to be seen as tough and independent.
Its almost a perfect example of womanspeak and how it misdirects your assumptions to hide how pathetic it really is.
With these people, I think it would be more successful to threaten to have sex with men if they don't get their way.
For all their "WE ARE STRONG WOMEN", these feminists really just want to be men.
This is a foundational aspect of the feminist movement. It is (IMO) based on a very special blend of the apex fallacy and penis envy.
When the Declaration of Sentiments was written in 1848, women were a protected class. Men had legal obligations to pay her debts, feed, house and clothe their wives and daughters. There were legal repercussions for failing to do these things.
Divorce (which was always with cause) when won by a woman allowed her all of the benefits of marriage without any of the obligations. She was entitled to a house, food, etc. for life while her husband got nothing from her. Things were pretty sweet, as long as a woman got her shit together to pick a good match and build a life with her husband. The Feminist political movement repainted this situation as "absolute tyranny over [women]."
The Feminist political movement has imagined that all men are pussy-slaying Giga-Chads and applied political, legal and social pressure to get that for themselves.
A big part of the resentment that Feminists harbor is truly against the biological imperative to bear children and to raise them successfully. After the sexual revolution, they just ... don't really do that anymore. Women take hormonal birth control pills, pursue a career in an office and fuck every chad in 200 kilometers, starting with her collage campus. At 40 when the opportunities to party have dried up, she decides to enjoy the benefits of family and children; except she can't, so she buys cats.
Unfortunately there are still a lot of touch deprived men who'd buckle and fall easily if offered a crumb of intimacy, even from someone who hates them.
In fact, its the middle aged woman in combat trousers with rage in prior decades that created the very cycle of married men never having a hint of love or sex in their life unless it was used to manipulate them into servitude.
Taming of the shrew did not work in the direction expected?
In actuality, it'll turn out a hell of a lot more like Assemblywoman.
Why put leftist? That's just a woman thing. They've been sitting back and reading the rewards of the meat grinder for thousands of years.
They love it when the village is raided and the barbarians take them away as fuck slaves or marry them off. Women literally say dream about that, and write about it in their smut.
Leftism is womanhood taken to the most extreme
Right-wing women do seem to have a bit of backbone. But you're probably correct
It would be very interesting to find out what causes a woman to be self aware and to value marriage and men in general.
I'd bet that it is more common in women who were raised with a positive father in the home, something which is becoming vanishingly rare.
The issue is complex, both men and women have been subjected to decades of media manipulation with women being more predispose to it. Another is that we've stop enforcing moral lessons on kids, even religious parents are reluctant to enforce their religion. This one reason that Islam is successful.
The father issue is interesting, even with the father away to work most of the time, the mother would present him as a great man, greater then he was, Now the father can be in the picture and the mother will present him as week and useless, that needs to clean the house more, needs to wash the dishes on top of taking care of the yard, the cars, fixing up the house and accumulating wealth.
You are correct. In my experience it is without fail because they had a good father whom they could rely on and respect. If they spent their entire childhood trusting and loving their father, of course it's a lot easier for them to trust and love a man in a marriage.
Yeah, the life of a sex slave is very glamour.
To a naive fool who believes she will be treated the way her "spicy" books and fantasies tell her, it is.
The guy were talking about 'all of history'. It may seem remote, but there was a time there were no 'spicy' books. Also, I'm not sure how many of them describe a guy coming in, slaughtering your family and abducting you to be his slave.
You know that rape fantasies are just about the most common fantasies amongst women, right?
I don't mean the actual reality of terrible, brutal rape. I mean what they imagine it is like to have a hot, strong Chad not take no for an answer.
The more "liberal" a woman, the more common the fantasy. There have been studies on it.
Doesn't surprise me. But what OP was claiming is that women like having their families slaughtered and to be made the sex slave of some 'barbarian'... because romance novels.