Transgender individuals face heightened psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, partly due to stigma and lack of gender affirmation.
Yeah, we just aren't affirming them hard enough. You will suck the girldick and you will be happy, bigot.
This is nothing more than starting with a conclusion, and working backwards to find justifications for it. This isn't science, it's dogma. There is no institution that the left hasn't corrupted.
The conclusions are nonsense, you have to read the data itself. Even starting with the conclusion, the data was so overwhelming that they were forced to show that getting the surgery increases negative outcomes.
That’s actually the unfortunate thing about peer review anymore. You WILL NOT get published if your conclusions go against the “science”. This is just the same root problem that cause the reproducibility crisis, and the flat out fraudulent studies in the 60s-70s. Academia being politically and ideologically captured has created an environment where it is easier to be published by being flat out wrong by your own data, lying, or providing partial data than to say something that goes against current ideation.
They are nonsense, but are the only thing that anybody will pay attention to. It's the equivalent of how the media will put their spin in the headline and bury anything that contradicts it deep within the story, if they report it at all.
Yeah, we just aren't affirming them hard enough. You will suck the girldick and you will be happy, bigot.
This is nothing more than starting with a conclusion, and working backwards to find justifications for it. This isn't science, it's dogma. There is no institution that the left hasn't corrupted.
The conclusions are nonsense, you have to read the data itself. Even starting with the conclusion, the data was so overwhelming that they were forced to show that getting the surgery increases negative outcomes.
I've noticed that many times in many scientific papers that the abstract doesn't match the conclusion, and the conclusion doesn't match the data.
No one ever reads anything.
That’s actually the unfortunate thing about peer review anymore. You WILL NOT get published if your conclusions go against the “science”. This is just the same root problem that cause the reproducibility crisis, and the flat out fraudulent studies in the 60s-70s. Academia being politically and ideologically captured has created an environment where it is easier to be published by being flat out wrong by your own data, lying, or providing partial data than to say something that goes against current ideation.
Data shows trooning kids teens and adults don't make them less likely to off themselves.
Conclusion is ''we need more trans affirming healthcare and culture''.
Many such cases.
They are nonsense, but are the only thing that anybody will pay attention to. It's the equivalent of how the media will put their spin in the headline and bury anything that contradicts it deep within the story, if they report it at all.
"University researchers assert, without evidence, that Transgender individuals face stigma due to a lack of gender affirmation."
Time to whip out Hitchen's Razor, then. lol
Same energy.