That’s actually the unfortunate thing about peer review anymore. You WILL NOT get published if your conclusions go against the “science”. This is just the same root problem that cause the reproducibility crisis, and the flat out fraudulent studies in the 60s-70s. Academia being politically and ideologically captured has created an environment where it is easier to be published by being flat out wrong by your own data, lying, or providing partial data than to say something that goes against current ideation.