No. I'm gonna stop you right there. That is physically impossible. It is the most physically impossible thing that could ever be physically impossible. It's the Conservation of Energy Law. Even shit that we thought could break, broke before the Conservation of Energy. Free Energy has always been a fraud or a scam in every situation that it has ever been claimed. There are no exceptions in all of human history, nor anywhere in the observable universe, at any scale.
Could we travel instantaneously to different parts of the world for free.
No.
MH370
It crashed in the ocean one way or another. You ain't getting much more than that.
He's a physicist
Okay, so he knows he's a fraud and he's stealing money from people. Put him in jail.
Time Travel
Not in the way that you understand it because most people don't understand that time is just an axis of Spacetime. You live in 4 dimensions not 3. You can't separate time from space, because it's the same thing.
I'm no expert on the subject and I know it's most likely bullshit because it reeks of bullshit, but I think things like ZPE and "Cold Fusion" explicitly bypass the free energy trope. You're drawing energy out from somewhere so there's no over-unity. It's like drilling into an oil well. Anyway if it were real the deep state / council of 300 / majestic12 / men in black / aliens* have been doing a surprisingly good job of hiding it for decades and probably for good reason because you could blow up the planet with that shit.
(*or because we're talking about ZPE, it could be "The Trust" from SG-1)
You can't "draw energy freely". The words themselves are a contradiction. You would have work to get the energy. That work is literally a change in energy.
As for ZPE, the way any of this is being described to me doesn't make sense. That's just the lowest energy state of a quantized object. It's just the literal lowest state of energy. Energy isn't stored there, it's just the lowest amount of energy the object can have. It's not drilling oil from a well, it's claiming that you can use the fuel in your car when it's parked tonight to drive longer right now. It doesn't make any sense.
Honestly, in the history of science, you should be a lot more worried about the scientific establishment not accepting new evidence, then having new evidence and not sharing it.
Well, u/Graphenium! I'm favorably impressed. A quick skim of the transcript shows they got the science mostly right so far (including Gizortnik's last paragraph)! The right way to talk about time travel is (1) via Einsteinian time dilation as in Interstellar and (2) via the new science of negative time, although that is only a quantum-level effect as yet and in any model would need a new paradigm for sci-fi style interaction with the past. (Hm, let me meditate on that: entangled connection of the past anticipatory event with the future anticipated event. Got it bookmarked.)
I didn't check much for ZPE but they're absolutely on the right track with modifying permittivity. This is not a contradiction of conservation of energy either, the untapped energy is real (and predicted by the Bible) but too poorly understood to be tapped easily (thus all the frauds). They even bring in CDK! I'm looking forward to longer review.
I highly recommend you watch it when you get a chance. I watch a video or two after dinner most nights but you seem like you rarely take the time, instead opting for these transcripts which rarely even tell half the story. There’s a really crazy clip of “the MH370 plane being teleported by 3 ufos”. The most interesting part is that since it supposedly comes from a satellite it has thermal imaging too. The analysis of the “explosion” upon “teleportation” is pretty mind blowing (hint: it registers as black on a thermal imaging device…)
The indisputably observed universal redshift (aka Hubble redshift) proves that energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law” would demand.
Zero-point energy isn’t even up for debate, the only question is how do we harness it. Based on the evidence, it seems someone out there has harnessed it (see: Pentagon UFO disclosure movement)
Good on you for actually watching the video though
Based on the evidence, it seems someone out there has harnessed it (see: Pentagon UFO disclosure movement)
The idea of zero-point energy is that our vacuum is metastable but not the absolutely lowest possible energy state, and that we're currently in a local minimum. Pump energy into a vacuum in the right way and the vacuum could maybe get over that 'hump' go down into a lower energy state, and release energy in the process. Okay, fine.
I'm highly dubious of how well quantum field theory can even apply to these kind of conditions, since we don't have a unified theory. But even if it is, we know that energy levels found in e.g. CERN, or any number of other supercolliders across the world, aren't enough to trigger vacuum decay, because they haven't caused vacuum decay. Ditto with the energy densities found in the nuclear bombs. Or cosmic rays. Or anything else on Earth.
When Einstein disproved Isaac Newton's theory of gravitation, apples did not start falling up. Newton's Laws are still approximately good for a wide range of masses and speeds, and you have to get well outside those masses and speeds to see Newton start to break down. Same here. If there is a way to somehow force the vacuum into a lower energy state, the trigger point has to happen well beyond any energy we can currently explain or make accurate predictions for. And that's a pretty broad range.
In other words, in a best-case scenario where some pretty dodgy assumptions are true, you have to spend a LOT of energy to get energy. Which means it's nothing like the free energy the video describes.
Your “best case scenario” doesn’t appear to be the case experimentally, see: the Casimir effect. It’s a question of tapping into this source at scale and in a tunable manner
Did you watch the video or are you just replying to my comment in a vacuum?
The Casimir Effect doesn't violate the law of conservation of energy, and doesn't show a false vacuum; it's analogous to saying that capillary action, which is sometimes referred to as 'negative pressure', means that there's a way of getting less than zero air.
But also, the Casimir Effect was known theoretically for fifty years before it was experimentally verified. The same theory which predicts Casimir also predicts that there's absolutely no way to get energy out of it, and doesn't require our vacuum to even be false to begin with. If you want zero-point energy, you have to go well outside any scale that current quantum field theory can explain. And as I said earlier, that range is pretty broad.
Did you watch the video or are you just replying to my comment in a vacuum?
I'm definitely replying to your comment in a vacuum. You're the one saying that it's a false vacuum, not me.
The indisputably observed universal redshift (aka Hubble redshift) proves that energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law” would demand.
No... these concepts aren't even related.
Red-shifting and Blue-shifting is the doppler effect for light. That's all.
Red-shift isn't universal, some stars move away from us (red shift), while others are moving towards us (blue shift). The universe is universally expanding, but that's not a red shift. And all that that means is that the distance between atoms themselves is getting further.
None of that, literally none of that, has anything to do with the conservation of energy.
Zero-point energy... frankly I have no idea again what this has to do with the red shift of objects, let alone the idea of "free energy". You can't change energy without work... that's literally what it means. We literally define it to mean that. That's what a change in energy is.
Listen, don't give this person your money. He is a criminal. He is lying to you. Don't give him your time and attention either, but definitely don't give him money.
Who do you think knows more about the subject, you, or actual cosmologists/astrophysicists/etc?
It’s clear that cosmologists have not done a very good job of spreading the word about something that’s been well-understood since at least the 1920’s: energy is not conserved in general relativity.
It’s so funny how douchey you guys act while obviously being the ignorant ones, too lazy and intellectually dishonest to do anything even approaching “investigating claims” so you just endless yap in the comments without sayinganything
Hubble's law, also known as the Hubble–Lemaître law,[1] is the observation in physical cosmology that galaxies are moving away from Earth at speeds proportional to their distance. In other words, the farther a galaxy is from the Earth, the faster it moves away. A galaxy's recessional velocity is typically determined by measuring its redshift, a shift in the frequency of light emitted by the galaxy.
frankly I have no idea again what this has to do with the red shift of objects
Both demonstrate that the story of existence is clearly far more complex than those who cry “mUh fiRsT LaW” would seem to think is possible.
It’s funny how you frame your message so condescendingly but you don’t even seem to know much at all about the subjects. Have you really never heard of cosmological redshift? This is like 80 years old, everyone knows about it, basic stuff, in terms of cosmology atleast.
Newton's First Law isn't the same as the conservation of energy. It's related to it, but it's not the same. And again, red-shifting is a behavior, not a law. There is the Hubble-Lemaitre Law, but that's not the same as red-shifting. You are being bamboozled because someone is teaching you to conflate and confuse words and meanings.
"The story of existence" isn't defined by Newton's laws. Newton just created a system to explain kinematics by identifying it's simplest component parts. That system has held entirely true. We already know where Newtonian Mechanics falls apart, which is why Einsteinian Mechanics and Quantum Physics exists, but those fundamental laws do not actually change. It's only that the math context and assumptions Newton was using aren't sufficient.
It should concern you, being on the same side of an issue as that insane shill
Have you read what the guy who’s Phd thesis was ”Cosmological Consequences of Topological and Geometric Phenomena in Field Theories”, yet? Or are you still just yapping based on gut feeling?
No. I'm gonna stop you right there. That is physically impossible. It is the most physically impossible thing that could ever be physically impossible. It's the Conservation of Energy Law. Even shit that we thought could break, broke before the Conservation of Energy. Free Energy has always been a fraud or a scam in every situation that it has ever been claimed. There are no exceptions in all of human history, nor anywhere in the observable universe, at any scale.
No.
It crashed in the ocean one way or another. You ain't getting much more than that.
Okay, so he knows he's a fraud and he's stealing money from people. Put him in jail.
Not in the way that you understand it because most people don't understand that time is just an axis of Spacetime. You live in 4 dimensions not 3. You can't separate time from space, because it's the same thing.
I'm no expert on the subject and I know it's most likely bullshit because it reeks of bullshit, but I think things like ZPE and "Cold Fusion" explicitly bypass the free energy trope. You're drawing energy out from somewhere so there's no over-unity. It's like drilling into an oil well. Anyway if it were real the deep state / council of 300 / majestic12 / men in black / aliens* have been doing a surprisingly good job of hiding it for decades and probably for good reason because you could blow up the planet with that shit.
(*or because we're talking about ZPE, it could be "The Trust" from SG-1)
You can't "draw energy freely". The words themselves are a contradiction. You would have work to get the energy. That work is literally a change in energy.
As for ZPE, the way any of this is being described to me doesn't make sense. That's just the lowest energy state of a quantized object. It's just the literal lowest state of energy. Energy isn't stored there, it's just the lowest amount of energy the object can have. It's not drilling oil from a well, it's claiming that you can use the fuel in your car when it's parked tonight to drive longer right now. It doesn't make any sense.
what if they're teaching us wrong on purpose?
They teach themselves the same thing.
Honestly, in the history of science, you should be a lot more worried about the scientific establishment not accepting new evidence, then having new evidence and not sharing it.
Well, u/Graphenium! I'm favorably impressed. A quick skim of the transcript shows they got the science mostly right so far (including Gizortnik's last paragraph)! The right way to talk about time travel is (1) via Einsteinian time dilation as in Interstellar and (2) via the new science of negative time, although that is only a quantum-level effect as yet and in any model would need a new paradigm for sci-fi style interaction with the past. (Hm, let me meditate on that: entangled connection of the past anticipatory event with the future anticipated event. Got it bookmarked.)
I didn't check much for ZPE but they're absolutely on the right track with modifying permittivity. This is not a contradiction of conservation of energy either, the untapped energy is real (and predicted by the Bible) but too poorly understood to be tapped easily (thus all the frauds). They even bring in CDK! I'm looking forward to longer review.
I highly recommend you watch it when you get a chance. I watch a video or two after dinner most nights but you seem like you rarely take the time, instead opting for these transcripts which rarely even tell half the story. There’s a really crazy clip of “the MH370 plane being teleported by 3 ufos”. The most interesting part is that since it supposedly comes from a satellite it has thermal imaging too. The analysis of the “explosion” upon “teleportation” is pretty mind blowing (hint: it registers as black on a thermal imaging device…)
The indisputably observed universal redshift (aka Hubble redshift) proves that energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law” would demand.
Zero-point energy isn’t even up for debate, the only question is how do we harness it. Based on the evidence, it seems someone out there has harnessed it (see: Pentagon UFO disclosure movement)
Good on you for actually watching the video though
The idea of zero-point energy is that our vacuum is metastable but not the absolutely lowest possible energy state, and that we're currently in a local minimum. Pump energy into a vacuum in the right way and the vacuum could maybe get over that 'hump' go down into a lower energy state, and release energy in the process. Okay, fine.
I'm highly dubious of how well quantum field theory can even apply to these kind of conditions, since we don't have a unified theory. But even if it is, we know that energy levels found in e.g. CERN, or any number of other supercolliders across the world, aren't enough to trigger vacuum decay, because they haven't caused vacuum decay. Ditto with the energy densities found in the nuclear bombs. Or cosmic rays. Or anything else on Earth.
When Einstein disproved Isaac Newton's theory of gravitation, apples did not start falling up. Newton's Laws are still approximately good for a wide range of masses and speeds, and you have to get well outside those masses and speeds to see Newton start to break down. Same here. If there is a way to somehow force the vacuum into a lower energy state, the trigger point has to happen well beyond any energy we can currently explain or make accurate predictions for. And that's a pretty broad range.
In other words, in a best-case scenario where some pretty dodgy assumptions are true, you have to spend a LOT of energy to get energy. Which means it's nothing like the free energy the video describes.
Your “best case scenario” doesn’t appear to be the case experimentally, see: the Casimir effect. It’s a question of tapping into this source at scale and in a tunable manner
Did you watch the video or are you just replying to my comment in a vacuum?
The Casimir Effect doesn't violate the law of conservation of energy, and doesn't show a false vacuum; it's analogous to saying that capillary action, which is sometimes referred to as 'negative pressure', means that there's a way of getting less than zero air.
But also, the Casimir Effect was known theoretically for fifty years before it was experimentally verified. The same theory which predicts Casimir also predicts that there's absolutely no way to get energy out of it, and doesn't require our vacuum to even be false to begin with. If you want zero-point energy, you have to go well outside any scale that current quantum field theory can explain. And as I said earlier, that range is pretty broad.
I'm definitely replying to your comment in a vacuum. You're the one saying that it's a false vacuum, not me.
No... these concepts aren't even related.
Red-shifting and Blue-shifting is the doppler effect for light. That's all.
Red-shift isn't universal, some stars move away from us (red shift), while others are moving towards us (blue shift). The universe is universally expanding, but that's not a red shift. And all that that means is that the distance between atoms themselves is getting further.
None of that, literally none of that, has anything to do with the conservation of energy.
Zero-point energy... frankly I have no idea again what this has to do with the red shift of objects, let alone the idea of "free energy". You can't change energy without work... that's literally what it means. We literally define it to mean that. That's what a change in energy is.
Listen, don't give this person your money. He is a criminal. He is lying to you. Don't give him your time and attention either, but definitely don't give him money.
Imma be real. I don't think you're going to be able to reach him.
And I don't mean you personally can't do it, I mean I don't think there's a combination of words that will get through to him.
It happens sometimes. I get this stuff with the moon landings too.
Who do you think knows more about the subject, you, or actual cosmologists/astrophysicists/etc?
https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_M._Carroll
It’s so funny how douchey you guys act while obviously being the ignorant ones, too lazy and intellectually dishonest to do anything even approaching “investigating claims” so you just endless yap in the comments without saying anything
https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/4509-Image.html
Both demonstrate that the story of existence is clearly far more complex than those who cry “mUh fiRsT LaW” would seem to think is possible.
It’s funny how you frame your message so condescendingly but you don’t even seem to know much at all about the subjects. Have you really never heard of cosmological redshift? This is like 80 years old, everyone knows about it, basic stuff, in terms of cosmology atleast.
You are being bamboozled. Literally.
Newton's First Law isn't the same as the conservation of energy. It's related to it, but it's not the same. And again, red-shifting is a behavior, not a law. There is the Hubble-Lemaitre Law, but that's not the same as red-shifting. You are being bamboozled because someone is teaching you to conflate and confuse words and meanings.
"The story of existence" isn't defined by Newton's laws. Newton just created a system to explain kinematics by identifying it's simplest component parts. That system has held entirely true. We already know where Newtonian Mechanics falls apart, which is why Einsteinian Mechanics and Quantum Physics exists, but those fundamental laws do not actually change. It's only that the math context and assumptions Newton was using aren't sufficient.
Your comment is on the right track. Glad to see the techies are out trying to unpack it, it's a job we can all do together. To infinity and beyond.
You couldn't be more wrong.
If you have an energy per volume and then increase that volume then your energy per volume should go down.
Why the fuck are you making me defend Gizortnik?
Shalom, my true plan is coming along nicely.
Here are your shekles, golem.
/s <--- (for when someone goes to ConPro and claims this as evidence)
It should concern you, being on the same side of an issue as that insane shill
Have you read what the guy who’s Phd thesis was ”Cosmological Consequences of Topological and Geometric Phenomena in Field Theories”, yet? Or are you still just yapping based on gut feeling?
Agreed. I feel dirty
Where does the energy to increase that volume come from you moron? You think that’s an action which can happen freely?
It doesn't take energy to maintain an expansion into nothingness.