Based on the evidence, it seems someone out there has harnessed it (see: Pentagon UFO disclosure movement)
The idea of zero-point energy is that our vacuum is metastable but not the absolutely lowest possible energy state, and that we're currently in a local minimum. Pump energy into a vacuum in the right way and the vacuum could maybe get over that 'hump' go down into a lower energy state, and release energy in the process. Okay, fine.
I'm highly dubious of how well quantum field theory can even apply to these kind of conditions, since we don't have a unified theory. But even if it is, we know that energy levels found in e.g. CERN, or any number of other supercolliders across the world, aren't enough to trigger vacuum decay, because they haven't caused vacuum decay. Ditto with the energy densities found in the nuclear bombs. Or cosmic rays. Or anything else on Earth.
When Einstein disproved Isaac Newton's theory of gravitation, apples did not start falling up. Newton's Laws are still approximately good for a wide range of masses and speeds, and you have to get well outside those masses and speeds to see Newton start to break down. Same here. If there is a way to somehow force the vacuum into a lower energy state, the trigger point has to happen well beyond any energy we can currently explain or make accurate predictions for. And that's a pretty broad range.
In other words, in a best-case scenario where some pretty dodgy assumptions are true, you have to spend a LOT of energy to get energy. Which means it's nothing like the free energy the video describes.
Your “best case scenario” doesn’t appear to be the case experimentally, see: the Casimir effect. It’s a question of tapping into this source at scale and in a tunable manner
Did you watch the video or are you just replying to my comment in a vacuum?
The Casimir Effect doesn't violate the law of conservation of energy, and doesn't show a false vacuum; it's analogous to saying that capillary action, which is sometimes referred to as 'negative pressure', means that there's a way of getting less than zero air.
But also, the Casimir Effect was known theoretically for fifty years before it was experimentally verified. The same theory which predicts Casimir also predicts that there's absolutely no way to get energy out of it, and doesn't require our vacuum to even be false to begin with. If you want zero-point energy, you have to go well outside any scale that current quantum field theory can explain. And as I said earlier, that range is pretty broad.
Did you watch the video or are you just replying to my comment in a vacuum?
I'm definitely replying to your comment in a vacuum. You're the one saying that it's a false vacuum, not me.
Let's be real; the person you're replying to literally believes in no-shit magic. Actual magic. He think you can set things on fire with mind energy. His grasp of scientific principles is questionable at best.
Magic yes, but as a Christian I believe in actual magic too. u/Graphenium might be better charged with overzealous tone-deafness as to topicality, and dogged pursuit of Pyrrhic victory, than with science (gnosis) fails. More at c/Conspiracies anytime.
I'm definitely replying to your comment in a vacuum. You're the one saying that it's a false vacuum, not me.
Actually what you quoted me saying is that the characteristics of ufos, as seen in government disclosures, indicates they’ve tapped into it to power their “impossible” maneuvers and accelerations
The idea of zero-point energy is that our vacuum is metastable but not the absolutely lowest possible energy state, and that we're currently in a local minimum. Pump energy into a vacuum in the right way and the vacuum could maybe get over that 'hump' go down into a lower energy state, and release energy in the process. Okay, fine.
I'm highly dubious of how well quantum field theory can even apply to these kind of conditions, since we don't have a unified theory. But even if it is, we know that energy levels found in e.g. CERN, or any number of other supercolliders across the world, aren't enough to trigger vacuum decay, because they haven't caused vacuum decay. Ditto with the energy densities found in the nuclear bombs. Or cosmic rays. Or anything else on Earth.
When Einstein disproved Isaac Newton's theory of gravitation, apples did not start falling up. Newton's Laws are still approximately good for a wide range of masses and speeds, and you have to get well outside those masses and speeds to see Newton start to break down. Same here. If there is a way to somehow force the vacuum into a lower energy state, the trigger point has to happen well beyond any energy we can currently explain or make accurate predictions for. And that's a pretty broad range.
In other words, in a best-case scenario where some pretty dodgy assumptions are true, you have to spend a LOT of energy to get energy. Which means it's nothing like the free energy the video describes.
Your “best case scenario” doesn’t appear to be the case experimentally, see: the Casimir effect. It’s a question of tapping into this source at scale and in a tunable manner
Did you watch the video or are you just replying to my comment in a vacuum?
The Casimir Effect doesn't violate the law of conservation of energy, and doesn't show a false vacuum; it's analogous to saying that capillary action, which is sometimes referred to as 'negative pressure', means that there's a way of getting less than zero air.
But also, the Casimir Effect was known theoretically for fifty years before it was experimentally verified. The same theory which predicts Casimir also predicts that there's absolutely no way to get energy out of it, and doesn't require our vacuum to even be false to begin with. If you want zero-point energy, you have to go well outside any scale that current quantum field theory can explain. And as I said earlier, that range is pretty broad.
I'm definitely replying to your comment in a vacuum. You're the one saying that it's a false vacuum, not me.
Let's be real; the person you're replying to literally believes in no-shit magic. Actual magic. He think you can set things on fire with mind energy. His grasp of scientific principles is questionable at best.
Magic yes, but as a Christian I believe in actual magic too. u/Graphenium might be better charged with overzealous tone-deafness as to topicality, and dogged pursuit of Pyrrhic victory, than with science (gnosis) fails. More at c/Conspiracies anytime.
https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/19A12niAUS/the-jews-made-me-lose/c/4ZHkbMGhnDc
Holy psychopath alert!!!! Ragnar you’re still stalking me? Fucking freak
I must have REALLY struck a nerve when I called you a disabled waste of space shill 4 years ago huh? Go ahead and delete this account too
Hey look! it’s a 10 day old sockpuppet run by a shill!
Actually what you quoted me saying is that the characteristics of ufos, as seen in government disclosures, indicates they’ve tapped into it to power their “impossible” maneuvers and accelerations
I recommend the video