Yes, but what is never mentioned about those book burnings in Openplatz, Germany that is always decried as muh heckin' evil book burnings , is what those books were that were being burned. Look up Magnus Hirschfeld and his research.
He's a precursor to Dr. Johnathon Money, the guy famous for performing a sex change on one of two identical twins, and then watching like a fucking degenerate "documenting" them having sex. IIRC, at least one of those two twins suicided later on.
I'm aware of that. The "nazi book burnings" were also organised by students and they're an absolute nothing burger compared to the "de-nazification" after the war.
Libya was never occupied by the States. Also I highly doubt that anything of that sort happened in Iraq or Afghanistan. There was no reason for it and there was probably not much worth burning in the first place. Sensitive documents might have been destroyed but nothing more.
First of all we would know about it. It's impossible to keep something of that scope secret. Second you need a complete military occupation to achieve it. Third unlike WW2 the goal of the Iraq and Afghanistan war was never to utterly destroy the Iraqi and Afghani people and culture.
goal of the Iraq and Afghanistan war was never to utterly destroy the Iraqi and Afghani people and culture.
But that is exactly what happened. ISIS (a CIA puppet org) was focussed on destroying historical artifacts. And multiple parties benefitted from erasing those identities.
If that was the case than those artifacts would have been destroyed ages ago because the area was under muslim rule for thousands of years. But they weren't it was only when ISIS came along that it was destroyed. And its because they are controlled by CIA
Book burning has always been a "we took a photo at a specific moment that looks really bad, so now its a talking point" type event. Every side commits it, everyone is guilty of it in some form, its a complete nonsense thing to grandstand on and always has been.
And considering all the other research the Japs were big on at the time, I doubt there is anything of value in there besides gore and confirmation bias. I'm not against it existing, but at this state of the universe its not going to tell us something new about Jews that people who are open to the message don't already believe.
it might not tell us anything new about jews or their behaviour in general but it might give us more detailed information which would be interesting from the point of view of someone from 1944, who would most certainly have more detailed information about jews that have been lost to time and that people today would have missed. .
But anyone willing to read the book and believe it already thinks Jews should be destroyed, gassed, killed, and all other forms of end game actions. Anyone who isn't at that point is very unlikely to think the things in the book aren't lies.
Point being is that, while interesting, that's all it is. You, or anyone else, aren't going to change their mind over what they read in it. Its just outrage porn.
I'm aware of his point of view. But that doesn't matter.
Someone like him will read it and it just confirms what he already believes, or he discards it as lies if it isn't suffeciently anti-Jew enough. And anyone who isn't at that level of extremity (like maybe yourself) will discard it as "more antisemitic lies," or if it its pro-Jew enough just be a drop in the ocean of their beliefs confirming what they already believe.
That's all I'm getting at. Its a topic so polarized, with all of its literature even more so, that no actual piece matters in the slightest. No one is engaging with books like this to learn or challenge their minds, its just for confirmation of preregistered beliefs.
It does have value though, it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed. If you think something doesn't have value "just because it won't change your mind" then this whole forum doesn't have value because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society so what's the point of all the posts here telling us what we already know?
it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed.
The Allied forces were trying to create a victim narrative for the Jews. Whether it was inventing a Holocaust wholesale or simply downplaying all the "fuck around" portions of Jewish actions that lead to an actual Holocaust happening, they were going around making sure to control as much of the details as possible. That doesn't mean any of those details was particularly powerful or revealing itself. Especially as, there is no guarantee its not information we already know right now anyway.
because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society
Just because you don't argue with people here in good faith and attempt to challenge your own beliefs by engaging with people on the level doesn't mean all of us do.
In this very comment thread I am arguing with an anti-semite and a pro-Jew about the same exact point I am making to both. That has value to me.
What would reading the book actually change about what you believe? Would you become more pro-Jew if it was exonerating to them? Is there any room left for you to become more anti-Jew? Remember you can only kill them once.
His perspective was obvious from the title alone, as what he desired the book for. Your dismissal of it is little better than his clamor for it, as both betray a completely closed mind on the topic.
But that is the danger of the topic, nobody has any ability to be anything but extreme on it. It is either a book of lies about Jews or Jewish lies.
If something is the truth then its not "extreme" to talk about it. . Nobody ever says its "extreme" to comment on the bad behaviour of muslims so why is it only "extreme" when it comes to talking about jews?
Dude… you just LIVED through a period of book burning, including some literal burning, but most of it through censorship, forced rewrites and outright deletion of information on the Internet through wrongthink.
Ah, books about the long nosed bringers of misary and despair? But enough about the tengu ;)
I always find it funny how only one is mentioned when it comes to book burning, yet no one talked about the books that were burned and don't you dare look it up. Here when it's the good guys doing it it's totally fine though.
Do you ever do anything besides seethe about the jews? I'm just curious. They seem to be living rent free in your head, and you probably should seek therapy (and charge them rent).
None of the conpro faggots are real humans actually trying to understand reality. They're leftist propagandists trying to drown actual right wing sites under a flood of goblinoid forum sliding.
Frankly we need a wall and deportations of our own, sheer volume of retarded brigaders is killing this board.
It's so obvious how fake they are, too. All you have to do to be accurate with half the "reeee jooos" bullshit is just stop trying to claim it's one ethnic group and actually identify globalists. But they don't want people to recognize the globalists, they want any criticism of the actual cabal to be dismissed by association.
Actual humans trying to make real arguments aren't that retarded. Anyone with two eyes and functioning pattern recognition capability can see that it is neither all jews nor exclusively jews, so deliberately reducing things to an obviously wrong target is not ignorance, it's malice.
Some of those faggots are so terminally online they have to be welfare goblins or paid shills. Deliberate shilling organizations like actblue should be made illegal, IMO.
No need to look at Japan. The amount of literature that was burned/destroyed/banned after WW2 in Germany is staggering.
Yes, but what is never mentioned about those book burnings in Openplatz, Germany that is always decried as muh heckin' evil book burnings , is what those books were that were being burned. Look up Magnus Hirschfeld and his research.
He's a precursor to Dr. Johnathon Money, the guy famous for performing a sex change on one of two identical twins, and then
watching like a fucking degenerate"documenting" them having sex. IIRC, at least one of those two twins suicided later on.They both killed themselves because he had them hump each other as part of his failed human experiment that he subsequently falsified the research on.
It was both that killed themselves? I couldn't remember.
yes
I'm aware of that. The "nazi book burnings" were also organised by students and they're an absolute nothing burger compared to the "de-nazification" after the war.
"Nothing happened in Germany between 1918-1932. Just one day out of nowhere they did a heckin bigotry."
I bet America also burned books in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya when those countries were occupied as well.
Libya was never occupied by the States. Also I highly doubt that anything of that sort happened in Iraq or Afghanistan. There was no reason for it and there was probably not much worth burning in the first place. Sensitive documents might have been destroyed but nothing more.
What makes you think it didn't happen in Iraq and Afghanistan when they did it to Germany and Japan?
First of all we would know about it. It's impossible to keep something of that scope secret. Second you need a complete military occupation to achieve it. Third unlike WW2 the goal of the Iraq and Afghanistan war was never to utterly destroy the Iraqi and Afghani people and culture.
But that is exactly what happened. ISIS (a CIA puppet org) was focussed on destroying historical artifacts. And multiple parties benefitted from erasing those identities.
ISIS destroys historical artifacts because Islam is an iconoclastic religion, not because of the CIA.
If that was the case than those artifacts would have been destroyed ages ago because the area was under muslim rule for thousands of years. But they weren't it was only when ISIS came along that it was destroyed. And its because they are controlled by CIA
Thats why ISIS did it, so the Zionists can come in later and blame it on Islam.
We are witnessing another round of this trickery in Gaza right now.
Book burning has always been a "we took a photo at a specific moment that looks really bad, so now its a talking point" type event. Every side commits it, everyone is guilty of it in some form, its a complete nonsense thing to grandstand on and always has been.
And considering all the other research the Japs were big on at the time, I doubt there is anything of value in there besides gore and confirmation bias. I'm not against it existing, but at this state of the universe its not going to tell us something new about Jews that people who are open to the message don't already believe.
it might not tell us anything new about jews or their behaviour in general but it might give us more detailed information which would be interesting from the point of view of someone from 1944, who would most certainly have more detailed information about jews that have been lost to time and that people today would have missed. .
I mean yeah it might be interesting in a way.
But anyone willing to read the book and believe it already thinks Jews should be destroyed, gassed, killed, and all other forms of end game actions. Anyone who isn't at that point is very unlikely to think the things in the book aren't lies.
Point being is that, while interesting, that's all it is. You, or anyone else, aren't going to change their mind over what they read in it. Its just outrage porn.
Op is already one of those people. We have many such cases of the shortbus brigade here.
I'm aware of his point of view. But that doesn't matter.
Someone like him will read it and it just confirms what he already believes, or he discards it as lies if it isn't suffeciently anti-Jew enough. And anyone who isn't at that level of extremity (like maybe yourself) will discard it as "more antisemitic lies," or if it its pro-Jew enough just be a drop in the ocean of their beliefs confirming what they already believe.
That's all I'm getting at. Its a topic so polarized, with all of its literature even more so, that no actual piece matters in the slightest. No one is engaging with books like this to learn or challenge their minds, its just for confirmation of preregistered beliefs.
As in, it has little value.
It does have value though, it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed. If you think something doesn't have value "just because it won't change your mind" then this whole forum doesn't have value because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society so what's the point of all the posts here telling us what we already know?
The Allied forces were trying to create a victim narrative for the Jews. Whether it was inventing a Holocaust wholesale or simply downplaying all the "fuck around" portions of Jewish actions that lead to an actual Holocaust happening, they were going around making sure to control as much of the details as possible. That doesn't mean any of those details was particularly powerful or revealing itself. Especially as, there is no guarantee its not information we already know right now anyway.
Just because you don't argue with people here in good faith and attempt to challenge your own beliefs by engaging with people on the level doesn't mean all of us do.
In this very comment thread I am arguing with an anti-semite and a pro-Jew about the same exact point I am making to both. That has value to me.
What would reading the book actually change about what you believe? Would you become more pro-Jew if it was exonerating to them? Is there any room left for you to become more anti-Jew? Remember you can only kill them once.
I agree with you, I was just informing you that OP was one of those useless tits. I'm sure the book is useless at best, and flat out lies at worse.
His perspective was obvious from the title alone, as what he desired the book for. Your dismissal of it is little better than his clamor for it, as both betray a completely closed mind on the topic.
But that is the danger of the topic, nobody has any ability to be anything but extreme on it. It is either a book of lies about Jews or Jewish lies.
If something is the truth then its not "extreme" to talk about it. . Nobody ever says its "extreme" to comment on the bad behaviour of muslims so why is it only "extreme" when it comes to talking about jews?
Yeah its a book about jews. And also pllleaasse i want an english translation of this book .
Dude… you just LIVED through a period of book burning, including some literal burning, but most of it through censorship, forced rewrites and outright deletion of information on the Internet through wrongthink.
Ah, books about the long nosed bringers of misary and despair? But enough about the tengu ;)
I always find it funny how only one is mentioned when it comes to book burning, yet no one talked about the books that were burned and don't you dare look it up. Here when it's the good guys doing it it's totally fine though.
yeah I was listening to something on the denazification the other day
Loads of newspapers, magazines, cinemas, theatres, publishers... all seized and something like 30k books banned
We archive around here lest what has been written goes up in smoke.
So what's the book called? Is there a translation?
The name of the book is 復刻・ユダヤの対日謀略
And no i can't find any English version
Japan was a bunch of dirty nips anyway. Not carrying water for them.
Do you ever do anything besides seethe about the jews? I'm just curious. They seem to be living rent free in your head, and you probably should seek therapy (and charge them rent).
None of the conpro faggots are real humans actually trying to understand reality. They're leftist propagandists trying to drown actual right wing sites under a flood of goblinoid forum sliding.
Frankly we need a wall and deportations of our own, sheer volume of retarded brigaders is killing this board.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Con Pro users are not an identity group
They're consistent at least. If they can't get boards banned, they screech about "muh jews" until they all get perma banned or everyone else leaves.
It's so obvious how fake they are, too. All you have to do to be accurate with half the "reeee jooos" bullshit is just stop trying to claim it's one ethnic group and actually identify globalists. But they don't want people to recognize the globalists, they want any criticism of the actual cabal to be dismissed by association.
Actual humans trying to make real arguments aren't that retarded. Anyone with two eyes and functioning pattern recognition capability can see that it is neither all jews nor exclusively jews, so deliberately reducing things to an obviously wrong target is not ignorance, it's malice.
Some of those faggots are so terminally online they have to be welfare goblins or paid shills. Deliberate shilling organizations like actblue should be made illegal, IMO.