I'm aware of his point of view. But that doesn't matter.
Someone like him will read it and it just confirms what he already believes, or he discards it as lies if it isn't suffeciently anti-Jew enough. And anyone who isn't at that level of extremity (like maybe yourself) will discard it as "more antisemitic lies," or if it its pro-Jew enough just be a drop in the ocean of their beliefs confirming what they already believe.
That's all I'm getting at. Its a topic so polarized, with all of its literature even more so, that no actual piece matters in the slightest. No one is engaging with books like this to learn or challenge their minds, its just for confirmation of preregistered beliefs.
It does have value though, it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed. If you think something doesn't have value "just because it won't change your mind" then this whole forum doesn't have value because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society so what's the point of all the posts here telling us what we already know?
it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed.
The Allied forces were trying to create a victim narrative for the Jews. Whether it was inventing a Holocaust wholesale or simply downplaying all the "fuck around" portions of Jewish actions that lead to an actual Holocaust happening, they were going around making sure to control as much of the details as possible. That doesn't mean any of those details was particularly powerful or revealing itself. Especially as, there is no guarantee its not information we already know right now anyway.
because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society
Just because you don't argue with people here in good faith and attempt to challenge your own beliefs by engaging with people on the level doesn't mean all of us do.
In this very comment thread I am arguing with an anti-semite and a pro-Jew about the same exact point I am making to both. That has value to me.
What would reading the book actually change about what you believe? Would you become more pro-Jew if it was exonerating to them? Is there any room left for you to become more anti-Jew? Remember you can only kill them once.
His perspective was obvious from the title alone, as what he desired the book for. Your dismissal of it is little better than his clamor for it, as both betray a completely closed mind on the topic.
But that is the danger of the topic, nobody has any ability to be anything but extreme on it. It is either a book of lies about Jews or Jewish lies.
If something is the truth then its not "extreme" to talk about it. . Nobody ever says its "extreme" to comment on the bad behaviour of muslims so why is it only "extreme" when it comes to talking about jews?
Its extreme because its at the end of the line. You can't go much further than it once you've reached it, and under the umbrella of its belief you often cannot be anything less on it. As shown by the fact that I am making comments that are generally anti-Jew here, but you find it questionable that I am not 200% on your end.
Also, anti-Jew discussion is usually called "extreme" because it has no nuance. They are either demons that deserve a First, Second, and Fifth holocaust that we should remove from society by all means, or you are a Zionist Jew lover. Whereas Muslims people will generally accept "leave them in their desert and stop dealing with them" as a point on the scale between "kill them all" or "embrace them."
I'm aware of his point of view. But that doesn't matter.
Someone like him will read it and it just confirms what he already believes, or he discards it as lies if it isn't suffeciently anti-Jew enough. And anyone who isn't at that level of extremity (like maybe yourself) will discard it as "more antisemitic lies," or if it its pro-Jew enough just be a drop in the ocean of their beliefs confirming what they already believe.
That's all I'm getting at. Its a topic so polarized, with all of its literature even more so, that no actual piece matters in the slightest. No one is engaging with books like this to learn or challenge their minds, its just for confirmation of preregistered beliefs.
As in, it has little value.
It does have value though, it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed. If you think something doesn't have value "just because it won't change your mind" then this whole forum doesn't have value because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society so what's the point of all the posts here telling us what we already know?
The Allied forces were trying to create a victim narrative for the Jews. Whether it was inventing a Holocaust wholesale or simply downplaying all the "fuck around" portions of Jewish actions that lead to an actual Holocaust happening, they were going around making sure to control as much of the details as possible. That doesn't mean any of those details was particularly powerful or revealing itself. Especially as, there is no guarantee its not information we already know right now anyway.
Just because you don't argue with people here in good faith and attempt to challenge your own beliefs by engaging with people on the level doesn't mean all of us do.
In this very comment thread I am arguing with an anti-semite and a pro-Jew about the same exact point I am making to both. That has value to me.
What would reading the book actually change about what you believe? Would you become more pro-Jew if it was exonerating to them? Is there any room left for you to become more anti-Jew? Remember you can only kill them once.
I agree with you, I was just informing you that OP was one of those useless tits. I'm sure the book is useless at best, and flat out lies at worse.
His perspective was obvious from the title alone, as what he desired the book for. Your dismissal of it is little better than his clamor for it, as both betray a completely closed mind on the topic.
But that is the danger of the topic, nobody has any ability to be anything but extreme on it. It is either a book of lies about Jews or Jewish lies.
If something is the truth then its not "extreme" to talk about it. . Nobody ever says its "extreme" to comment on the bad behaviour of muslims so why is it only "extreme" when it comes to talking about jews?
Its extreme because its at the end of the line. You can't go much further than it once you've reached it, and under the umbrella of its belief you often cannot be anything less on it. As shown by the fact that I am making comments that are generally anti-Jew here, but you find it questionable that I am not 200% on your end.
Also, anti-Jew discussion is usually called "extreme" because it has no nuance. They are either demons that deserve a First, Second, and Fifth holocaust that we should remove from society by all means, or you are a Zionist Jew lover. Whereas Muslims people will generally accept "leave them in their desert and stop dealing with them" as a point on the scale between "kill them all" or "embrace them."