His perspective was obvious from the title alone, as what he desired the book for. Your dismissal of it is little better than his clamor for it, as both betray a completely closed mind on the topic.
But that is the danger of the topic, nobody has any ability to be anything but extreme on it. It is either a book of lies about Jews or Jewish lies.
If something is the truth then its not "extreme" to talk about it. . Nobody ever says its "extreme" to comment on the bad behaviour of muslims so why is it only "extreme" when it comes to talking about jews?
Its extreme because its at the end of the line. You can't go much further than it once you've reached it, and under the umbrella of its belief you often cannot be anything less on it. As shown by the fact that I am making comments that are generally anti-Jew here, but you find it questionable that I am not 200% on your end.
Also, anti-Jew discussion is usually called "extreme" because it has no nuance. They are either demons that deserve a First, Second, and Fifth holocaust that we should remove from society by all means, or you are a Zionist Jew lover. Whereas Muslims people will generally accept "leave them in their desert and stop dealing with them" as a point on the scale between "kill them all" or "embrace them."
What the fuck are you talking about? Plenty of anti jew people would say "just leave jews in their desert and stop dealing with them".The problem becomes when jews want to force themselves in to our societies and won't leave us alone. And there's plenty of people who are supporting Israel massacing muslims in the Middle east despite the fact that those muslims in the middle east have nothing to do with us. i haven't heard of anti muslim people saying "leave muslims alone in their desert" when they are cheerleading israel genociding the Palestinians with American tax payer's money
I agree with you, I was just informing you that OP was one of those useless tits. I'm sure the book is useless at best, and flat out lies at worse.
His perspective was obvious from the title alone, as what he desired the book for. Your dismissal of it is little better than his clamor for it, as both betray a completely closed mind on the topic.
But that is the danger of the topic, nobody has any ability to be anything but extreme on it. It is either a book of lies about Jews or Jewish lies.
If something is the truth then its not "extreme" to talk about it. . Nobody ever says its "extreme" to comment on the bad behaviour of muslims so why is it only "extreme" when it comes to talking about jews?
Its extreme because its at the end of the line. You can't go much further than it once you've reached it, and under the umbrella of its belief you often cannot be anything less on it. As shown by the fact that I am making comments that are generally anti-Jew here, but you find it questionable that I am not 200% on your end.
Also, anti-Jew discussion is usually called "extreme" because it has no nuance. They are either demons that deserve a First, Second, and Fifth holocaust that we should remove from society by all means, or you are a Zionist Jew lover. Whereas Muslims people will generally accept "leave them in their desert and stop dealing with them" as a point on the scale between "kill them all" or "embrace them."
What the fuck are you talking about? Plenty of anti jew people would say "just leave jews in their desert and stop dealing with them".The problem becomes when jews want to force themselves in to our societies and won't leave us alone. And there's plenty of people who are supporting Israel massacing muslims in the Middle east despite the fact that those muslims in the middle east have nothing to do with us. i haven't heard of anti muslim people saying "leave muslims alone in their desert" when they are cheerleading israel genociding the Palestinians with American tax payer's money