We talk a lot about women wanting Alphas and Chads, and how they are programed to be attracted to strong males. The press went out of their way to create a new "non-toxic" masculinity. Do you think this had an effect on women, especially white women?
Comments (17)
sorted by:
That's ALL they have, typically masculine traits promote a more conservative, right leaning attitude since you now have the means to protect that which you own and/or care about than relying in others.
Any guys that have those traits supporting them always seem to have been paid off as they always look like they are phoning it in, it never seems like they are actually committed to the ideology.
This. The average leftoid is objectively less masculine than Freddy Mercury.
Power Bottoms are the new Tops.
It's also all that they have because they've been trying to redefine masculinity for years.
These people don't understand brain chemistry, don't understand sex roles, don't understand anything, but they want to dictate to you what's masculine and feminine.
I hate the feminists and the communists, sure -- but I have a special level of hatred reserved for the charlatan men who barked on command.
They are forever trying to indoctrinate men into soy simps who wont dare protect their family or property from the state. The party of no fault divorce raping, in control of all of the institutions. Men are pay pigs to be looted whenever they want.
They could run a masculine black man. It’s just hard to find one that’s married and doesn’t have multiple felonies. Obama was reasonably masculine - if only in the easy way he spoke.
Of course, behind the scenes he’s gay. But he fronts as heterosexual.
Obama was a skinny, light skinned twink with a stutter. There was little masculinity to be had about him, which is why the idea of "Michael" Obama became so common due to her looking like a roided double man next to him.
Biology → Culture → Ideology.
Alphas and Chads are a result of biology (predominately genetic). Which informs culture and in turn ideology and never the other way round.
Think of it in the form of computers - the hardware you use determines the operating system which in turn determines the software you can use but the software can't communicate with hardware directly and you can't run an OS designed for say ARM on an x86 processor natively.
In terms of politics, Alphas and Chads can change culture and in turn ideology but you can't prop up un-masculine men in the hope of changing culture and biology.
ETA: A key aspect of this is the general observation known as Briffault's Law - "The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place". This observation of biology informs culture which informs ideology but never the other way round.
Normal men don't take a backseat to women.
Only homos, soys, and cucks do.
Therefore normal men can't be in the democrat club that requires subservience to the authority of women.
Yeah no shit like 75% of white men aren't going to vote for you when you make it clear that the only role they will ever play in your party is being an emasculated little bitch boy who cheers for women and brown people as they replace him at everything.
Just like with their ''representation'' shitting-up videogames with ugly soy males and masculinized females : they just don't get it. They think this will draw the ''disenfranchized'' to them.
People prefer to see, and play as, attractive characters. They feel better when seeing beauty.
But the woke are at war with beauty and reality.
Yes, democrats are the gay homo party.
Feminism is a shit test that society failed. It is an attempt to smoke out the alpha and be put in their place. Every woman on tik tok right now screaming about how they can't have an abortion looks like a bitch in heat.
Yes, absolutely, and it's been that way for decades.
This all comes back to what Marx originally called "The New Socialist Man". Without going into inane detail, Communism is so fundamentally against human nature that Communists realized that they had to change humanity itself to make it work with the ideology. Therefore, men had to become "Socialized", which is to say: Collectivized along the desires of the party's cultural objectives. Incidentally, this is also where the Jewish Question comes from, as Marx agrees with other Socialists of the time period that jews are inherently greedy and are therefore incapable of becoming "New Socialist Men", and as a result, when Socialism inevitably wins, jews will disappear along with the state.
Quickly moving forward over 100 years, this concept keeps getting re-packaged as "new men" in one variation or another; but our most recent variations are quite literally: "Nu Males" and "Metro Sexuals". This is because they are keeping in-line with the Feminist dialectic, while trying to "Socialize" men into modern men.
If you've ever seen a Male Feminist or r/MensLib (again: Men's Liberation from The Patriarchy: a Feminist Dialectic); then you know what happens. You get wildly pathological men who are all cuttlefish style predators, or weak/suicidal/emotionally-incontinent men.
Now, imagine you're a 20 something white women who's been told that Feminism is only good, and good men are Male Feminists or are Men's Lib guys. You are psychologically conditioned to seek out the worst in random men, and the best men alive are men who are frauds who will rape you (Male Feminists), or emotionally incontinent men who need more emotional care than you do. You'd think men are shit too: if this is the best men can do, then they must be an inferior sex that shouldn't be taken seriously. They're not even really adults.
Worse, the institutions of the Social Justice Racket promote Cluster B Personality Disorders, and enforce their social rules in ways identical to Cluster B Personality Disorder patients would manipulate you, including gaslighting, love-bombing, hate-bombing, emotional blackmail, social blackmail, peer-group isolation, family isolation, etc. As a result, these women are being constantly emotionally abused by authority figures and peer-groups. The only source of emotional stoicism that they are going to find, would be in a boyfriend. But all their boyfriends are as emotionally incontinent as they are, or are frauds.
As a result, women are more emotionally unstable than they've ever been before, and are having fewer kids than ever. Forty-five percent of White Women under the age of 35 have a diagnosed mental health issue. One in fucking two. Yes, it's breaking them. Yes, it's killing them. Yes, it's causing a demographic collapse. Yes, they are acting to masculine, and men are acting to feminine. If you want to see the long-term consequences of women being hypermasculinized empowered girl bosses who don't need no man like no fish need no bicycle, look to the black community. That's not good.
But unfortunately, the Leftists can't make New Men, nor New Women. Yes, women are attracted to strong men {see: Stupid Sexy Trump Supporters}. But women are also utterly intolerant of weak men. This is because weak men are dangerous to women. Their safety and provisions can't be guaranteed. So, when men on the right say: "hey what about men's issues", the response is visceral because they don't see it as any different from their emotionally incontinent boyfriends they have to babysit. The ones they secretly resent, and ended their relationships with years ago in their head, but never said out-loud. As a result, these women use right-wing men as an emotional outlet to rage against. "Fuck you, I choose the bear" style.
Politically, these women don't trust men. Not with safety, not with money, not with power, because they've both been told to do everything themselves, and they've had to do everything themselves, and they fucking hate it. They are being misdirected to blame the rest of us, by the Feminist and Leftists who did this to them. So much so that yes, they don't trust us with children either. Better the child die, then risking having to raise the child alone given how utterly shit men are, and how utterly broken they are. This is why "I wish I had been aborted" is becoming the new mantra of the pro-abortion movement.
Unfortunately, that means that women can not be asked to solve this problem, because what we are looking at is women trying to solve this problem. Women need less agency in this issue. They actually need men to stand up, be stoic, be responsible, be productive, and legitimately fucking save them. Regardless of politics, they'll hurl themselves into that environment to get away from what they currently have to deal with. Moreover, once that happens, the men in their lives can become moral arbiters for the family, and civilization can finally begin to recover.
However, this means all of the weight sits on men's shoulders alone, without any real guidance. Specifically on the shoulders of men who are weak, emotionally incontinent frauds (which by our grand parents standards are all of us). The solution is clear, but the difficulty will be extreme, and the failure to be those adults will be an ever-present part of men in millennials, zoomers, and alpha. This blowback is why Trump is popular with young men, by the way.
This entire phenomenon can be intellectualized in uncountable ways, but all gloss over the most obvious truth that most men don't want to be faggots, figurative or literal.
What are they doing that DOESN'T hurt themselves?