Scott Adams is now N-posting
(twitter.com)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
For those of us not into twitter trends, there an explanation or just a random shitpost to see how easily leftists will warp it to trigger themselves?
Scott Adams did a post/article a while back where he got absolutely fed up and basically said white people can't live and/or be safe around black people.
Cue the pearl clutching and outrage.
So, yeah, it's basically random shitposting and trolling by this point.
My favorite retort is always "You would never say that around a black person!"
Yeah? Why might that be?
"Black people are violent!"
"Oh yeah? Why don't you say that to a black person's face! He's gonna beat you up to prove you wrong!"
He actually didn't say that.
He basically said that if you are a bleeding heart liberal that's living this crazy maternity over black people and hoping you can take care of them like children, recognize that they don't like you and just go. They don't want your help.
That was twisted pretty badly into: "Scott Adams said blacks and whites can't live together". When it was really: "You're not helping".
Bullshit.
Adams said “the best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from black people”.
This was in response to a poll that asked people whether or not they agreed with the statement “it’s okay to be white”. Nearly half of black respondents did not agree, which prompted Adams to label them a hate group.
Yes, it was all hypothetical based upon the accuracy of the poll data. Yes, he tried to walk it back after he was immediately canceled. But his statements were a direct response to blacks revealing themselves as rabidly anti-white.
I don't know why you're trying to make an argument that he's making a purely ethno-seperatism argument.
Anyway, here's his interview with Larry Elder.
The mentality he's talking about is the whole point that Maternalist attitudes and Resentment narratives are clearly incompatible, not blacks and whites.
What a lot of irrelevent crap lol.
You're becoming the new Lethn.
I don't know what to tell you. Watch his interview.
Holy low information batman
Uh huh, whatever you say, buddy.
https://www.ocregister.com/2023/02/24/dilberts-scott-adams-white-people-should-get-the-hell-away-from-black-people/
Why do I care what a secondary source says when I linked you the primary source?
Seriously, what are you all doing? Scott Adams is not a white nationalist...
What are you even trying to defend?
I get what you want to say, that's fine, you can say that, but that's not what he said.
You're really bad at gaslighting. You should stop.
I'm not gaslighting you. Scott Adams is not a white nationalist.
I could say that about a lot of things.
Well, yes. Maternalism & Paternalism breeds resentment.
It's called a N tower.
Seriously I'd assume he's seen so many black on white violence stories and videos and stories posted to his timeline he has fatigue. Conversely he's probably been talked down to and reprimanded so much by black twitter and libtard twitter he has embraced the fatigue.
The racists are right. They are they only side who want to have an honest discussion about our failed program of multiracialism.
I
G
G
E
S
!
Y! GET OUT OF HERE!
New word. Niggey. Thanks for sharing.
was going for a jojo reference but this works even better
Oh now Clott Adams has found his balls to stand up to tyranny and control (of language) from our Elites and their insane minions.
Gee, I wonder if he could have applied that to something else not that long ago.
Everybody has to start somewhere. Some are just more stubborn than others.
I'm not generally willing to say "oh let bygones be bygones, live and learn" when you threw your support directly onto the mass poisoning and possible death of tens of millions of people from it.
Its one thing to be naive and fall for it or even "trusted the science" and did it to offset the increasing consequences they pushed, its another to aggressively promote it while screaming at anyone who points out issues that may arise. And then never have the humility to admit being completely wrong afterwards when you try to change sides, especially if your response is "you were right but still you are fucking stupid" when forced to confront it.
Like, the vaxx wasn't some silly political policy that took a lot of steps before it created death and suffering. It was literally demanding people shoot something into their veins and letting the government force you to do it, that's not a "we all fuck up bro, you'll do better" position.
I'd just heard he changed his position on the vax, not that he was still doing the "You guys couldn't have possibly had the right heuristic to know the answer" bit. If that's the case, yeah, fuck him.
I disagree that someone can't repent and redeem themselves from having supported a bad position, but you actually have to have the humility to accept you were wrong. Some of the most vocal advocates against Communism used to be commies themselves. And by support, I mean cheerleading. What our politicians and healthcare professionals did is beyond redemption.
I don't believe in forgiveness or redemption without repentance. Repentance isn't as easy as "I changed my mind" and going for the other team, it needs genuine effort to make things right and suffer yourself as atonement for the suffering you created. Sitting in his rich mansion sipping coffee and screaming about a different topic is nothing of the sort.
Admitting to being wrong is step one of that, and he barely even is willing to do that and adds a dozen caveats to protect his ego. Because his ego is more important than the people who are fucking still dying.
Let's assume Scott Adams got over himself and admitted he was wrong and those against it were right, as well as smart and handsome and big dicked. What would you want him to do afterwards?
Nothing. He is a man whose entire career and fame depends on his beliefs, ideas, and words. He has shown those to not only be worthless, but easily manipulated and used as a weapon for his ego before anything else.
To simply say "I was wrong, I'm sorry I let my fear get the best of me" and then do nothing else would show a genuine remorse for his actions and that he recognizes his failing as a prelude to actual growth. Instead he picks up a new war to start to repeat the same actions.
His current controversy shows that has he done no reflection, as his ego and desire to be the smartest guy in the room is still 100% at the control of this crusade.