It's actually insane how much they hate this guy. Like, aside from Trump, and maybe Snowden, Alex Jones might be the most federally persecuted individual in the country. And all he really is is "old man yelling at clouds".
The simple answer is that what he's saying isn't complete nonsense.
By this point I'm more than willing to say Sandy Hook was a federal false flag, simply on the way the feds consistently loose their shit over anyone who says that.
Is there a serious look at some of the claims around Sandy Hook and a summary? I haven't followed it much but I'm not even sure what's actually being claimed. I've seen the video of Parents laughing and joking before tearing up for interviews.
Where does that fit into the overall picture?
my guess is because he was right about the crisis actors conspiracy theory. if the public accepts that, in the public accepts that the federal government staged mass casualty events, or was otherwise complicit in the murder of children.
Poisoning the well to Strawman, while shifting the Overton Window.
Just as the proliferation of Flat Earth and Fake Moon Landing theories by spooks is still being done to belittle and strawman those who question things like the JFK assassination, Waco, or 9/11 narratives, they're going after him to make destroying reasonable people much easier. You start with the "crazies" that most of the populace can agree on, then work from there ("anti-vaxxers", "White supremacists", "far-right", etc.)
This is guy who only in the past few years started talking about China being the global threat because of COVID, and most definitely the real ones puppeteering the US (/s). Previously, it was trans-dimensional vampires. He's a lightning rod for a certain breed of pseudo-intellectuals.
Just as the proliferation of Flat Earth and Fake Moon Landing theories by spooks is still being done to belittle and strawman those who question things like the JFK assassination, Waco, or 9/11 narratives,
I still believe with 100% conviction in the "Conspiracy Conspiracy", which is the deliberate sharing and proliferation of explicitly false conspiracy theories to help disguise, hide in plain site, or discredit other legitimate conspiracies that would otherwise easily and rightfully earn severe pushback.
Revenge? He's the guy who snuck into the Bilderberg conference and revealed their worship of Moloch to the public. He also supported Trump and had him on his show early on in the 2016 campaign.
It was not the feds though. He got sued by his victims - people he had defamed and / or their families. He then chose to breach the rules of litigation and had default judgment entered against him.
Wrong again. One of those people he was being sued by was a federal agent that was never present at the shooting and was never named by Trump.
he never breached the rules of litigation. The judges orders on discovery were unconstitutionally broad as it was, Alex complied with those orders, then provided more than was necessary. The prosecution claimed this was still not enough despite having several million pages of documents of everything the corporation had ever done, all of it's financial statements, all of it's marketing material, millions of emails, and the full contents of Jones' personal cellphone. So, the judge being a rabid political activist saw to protect this persecution from a jury trial and made a default judgement.
So yeah, the feds.
Don't fucking pretend that this exact strategy wasn't attempted in each of Donald Trump's trials.
Yea the bullshit claim by a judge when you lay everything out and then the judge goes "well I know you're obviously hiding something else, because I'm psychic or some shit." The whole thing is a massive fraud and a corruption of any kind of justice system.
I can accept a default judgement for refusing discovery, but that never happened. The individual must explicitly deny and refuse exact documents. That never happened. If that were the case, which documents were refused?
It was a sham show trial in the USA where the news defames people all the time and the UK isn't much better. Look at the Johnny Depp case or Ian Hislop.
and weren't the so called defamed acting in a political manner being used by the media?
It's actually insane how much they hate this guy. Like, aside from Trump, and maybe Snowden, Alex Jones might be the most federally persecuted individual in the country. And all he really is is "old man yelling at clouds".
Which really begs the question: Why? What point is there in going after Alex Jones if what he says is complete non-sense?
The simple answer is that what he's saying isn't complete nonsense.
By this point I'm more than willing to say Sandy Hook was a federal false flag, simply on the way the feds consistently loose their shit over anyone who says that.
Is there a serious look at some of the claims around Sandy Hook and a summary? I haven't followed it much but I'm not even sure what's actually being claimed. I've seen the video of Parents laughing and joking before tearing up for interviews. Where does that fit into the overall picture?
my guess is because he was right about the crisis actors conspiracy theory. if the public accepts that, in the public accepts that the federal government staged mass casualty events, or was otherwise complicit in the murder of children.
Poisoning the well to Strawman, while shifting the Overton Window.
Just as the proliferation of Flat Earth and Fake Moon Landing theories by spooks is still being done to belittle and strawman those who question things like the JFK assassination, Waco, or 9/11 narratives, they're going after him to make destroying reasonable people much easier. You start with the "crazies" that most of the populace can agree on, then work from there ("anti-vaxxers", "White supremacists", "far-right", etc.)
This is guy who only in the past few years started talking about China being the global threat because of COVID, and most definitely the real ones puppeteering the US (/s). Previously, it was trans-dimensional vampires. He's a lightning rod for a certain breed of pseudo-intellectuals.
I still believe with 100% conviction in the "Conspiracy Conspiracy", which is the deliberate sharing and proliferation of explicitly false conspiracy theories to help disguise, hide in plain site, or discredit other legitimate conspiracies that would otherwise easily and rightfully earn severe pushback.
Revenge? He's the guy who snuck into the Bilderberg conference and revealed their worship of Moloch to the public. He also supported Trump and had him on his show early on in the 2016 campaign.
It was not the feds though. He got sued by his victims - people he had defamed and / or their families. He then chose to breach the rules of litigation and had default judgment entered against him.
Wrong again. One of those people he was being sued by was a federal agent that was never present at the shooting and was never named by Trump.
he never breached the rules of litigation. The judges orders on discovery were unconstitutionally broad as it was, Alex complied with those orders, then provided more than was necessary. The prosecution claimed this was still not enough despite having several million pages of documents of everything the corporation had ever done, all of it's financial statements, all of it's marketing material, millions of emails, and the full contents of Jones' personal cellphone. So, the judge being a rabid political activist saw to protect this persecution from a jury trial and made a default judgement.
So yeah, the feds.
Don't fucking pretend that this exact strategy wasn't attempted in each of Donald Trump's trials.
Yea the bullshit claim by a judge when you lay everything out and then the judge goes "well I know you're obviously hiding something else, because I'm psychic or some shit." The whole thing is a massive fraud and a corruption of any kind of justice system.
I can accept a default judgement for refusing discovery, but that never happened. The individual must explicitly deny and refuse exact documents. That never happened. If that were the case, which documents were refused?
There wasn't any.
It was a sham show trial in the USA where the news defames people all the time and the UK isn't much better. Look at the Johnny Depp case or Ian Hislop.
and weren't the so called defamed acting in a political manner being used by the media?
"his victims"
You sound like a faggot.