It was not the feds though. He got sued by his victims - people he had defamed and / or their families. He then chose to breach the rules of litigation and had default judgment entered against him.
Wrong again. One of those people he was being sued by was a federal agent that was never present at the shooting and was never named by Trump.
he never breached the rules of litigation. The judges orders on discovery were unconstitutionally broad as it was, Alex complied with those orders, then provided more than was necessary. The prosecution claimed this was still not enough despite having several million pages of documents of everything the corporation had ever done, all of it's financial statements, all of it's marketing material, millions of emails, and the full contents of Jones' personal cellphone. So, the judge being a rabid political activist saw to protect this persecution from a jury trial and made a default judgement.
So yeah, the feds.
Don't fucking pretend that this exact strategy wasn't attempted in each of Donald Trump's trials.
Yea the bullshit claim by a judge when you lay everything out and then the judge goes "well I know you're obviously hiding something else, because I'm psychic or some shit." The whole thing is a massive fraud and a corruption of any kind of justice system.
I can accept a default judgement for refusing discovery, but that never happened. The individual must explicitly deny and refuse exact documents. That never happened. If that were the case, which documents were refused?
It was a sham show trial in the USA where the news defames people all the time and the UK isn't much better. Look at the Johnny Depp case or Ian Hislop.
and weren't the so called defamed acting in a political manner being used by the media?
It was not the feds though. He got sued by his victims - people he had defamed and / or their families. He then chose to breach the rules of litigation and had default judgment entered against him.
Wrong again. One of those people he was being sued by was a federal agent that was never present at the shooting and was never named by Trump.
he never breached the rules of litigation. The judges orders on discovery were unconstitutionally broad as it was, Alex complied with those orders, then provided more than was necessary. The prosecution claimed this was still not enough despite having several million pages of documents of everything the corporation had ever done, all of it's financial statements, all of it's marketing material, millions of emails, and the full contents of Jones' personal cellphone. So, the judge being a rabid political activist saw to protect this persecution from a jury trial and made a default judgement.
So yeah, the feds.
Don't fucking pretend that this exact strategy wasn't attempted in each of Donald Trump's trials.
Yea the bullshit claim by a judge when you lay everything out and then the judge goes "well I know you're obviously hiding something else, because I'm psychic or some shit." The whole thing is a massive fraud and a corruption of any kind of justice system.
I can accept a default judgement for refusing discovery, but that never happened. The individual must explicitly deny and refuse exact documents. That never happened. If that were the case, which documents were refused?
There wasn't any.
Yep the Judge just made up shit. Like the ones in Trump's cases where they ask for the jury "feelings" on the case rather than the actual evidence.
It was a sham show trial in the USA where the news defames people all the time and the UK isn't much better. Look at the Johnny Depp case or Ian Hislop.
and weren't the so called defamed acting in a political manner being used by the media?
"his victims"
You sound like a faggot.