Harris Political Ad Targeting 'Men'
(twitter.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Also discussed here: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/199O6RMe3V/real-men-vote-kamala-you-incel-b/
Update about the actors involved linked from this comment:
https://x.com/joma_gc/status/1844793372692848872
https://xcancel.com/joma_gc/status/1844793372692848872
This isn't a parody.
There's only one possible reason (for dems) to create this ad: to shore up the white women vote. But that's not why they did it, nobody involved has any even inkling that they just made one of the best pro-Trump ads of the political season.
It's like how the guy that created Trump Has No Chill (2016) didn't realize it made Trump look awesome and then rage-deleted it when he found out Trumpers actually liked it.
Holy shit, "Trump Has No Chill" was actually fuckin' great!
Meanwhile Trump gets this for free
Or the Italian who tried to mock Trump by depicting him as a seven story tall armoured god.
"That's a lot a men!"
Bathhouse Barry is also calling black men who won't get back on the planation sexists. They're shitting themselves.
I could have sworn that I heard the Harris cackle throughout that cringe-fest.
Nu-males barely register as males, let alone men.
More than half of those dudes are gay.
I hate how republicans suck sweetly on the shaft of israel but it is impossible not to hate democrats, and it's not just immigration/economics/trannies but the way they treat people and the headspace they expect us to occupy. They really think people are programmable little social media npc's and they enforce orthodoxy like a freaky cult. Their ailing system of social enforcement is responsible for the bulk of NGO demand for algorithmic technology- they literally could not censor people quickly or effectively enough without it. I see establishment democrats as "the white jew" where as I see establishment republicans as "the shabbos goyim", and as much as it pisses me off I choose the shabbos, or in the shabbiest of times, nobody.
If Trump signals no war with Iran I will turn out for him. Vote = consent and I won't consent to going to war for israel. He can make and break a promise and commit to things I never agreed with, but I wont directly consent to the platform if it includes that. If he thinks it's really important to keep Kamala out of office, and his team genuinely thinks they need every vote, they need to consider what is more important: going to war for israel, or keeping Kamala out. If they think it's not important to block her, or that they don't need my vote in order to block her, or that defending israel is more important than all other considerations... that is their decision.
Laughable.
Post Reported for: Rule 13 - Reposts
Post Removed: yeah it basically is.