Nevermind the forever lolisho argument. It seems they're trying to slander him with a fucking screenshot of some file names and "just trust me bro", cause I can't find any of those alleged archives.
It's fictional so I don't give a fuck, like how I don't give a fuck about the HUGE amount of rape in women's erotica. I only start giving a fuck when they start applying fantasy to reality which feminists do looking at how many of them welcome 'rapeugees' to the west..
If you apply the term pedophile to anyone OTHER than those that directly abuse children or indirect by means of production, distribution and consumption of ACTUAL WITH REAL CHILDREN CP, you should lose all voting rights or minimum I should be allowed to bitch slap you for trying to dilute the meaning of the term.
Lolicons are pedophiles. Forming your sexuality around naked anime toddlers is bizarre, abnormal freak behaviour. You will be relentlessly mocked and there is nothing you can do about it. Constantly consuming and promoting pornography with pedophilic themes is a recognised red flag that an individual may be at high risk for potentially abusing real children. If that statement makes you feel cognitive dissonance, you have an adjustment disorder and need to seek professional help before you seriously hurt someone. You are a pedophile. Loli is inherently pedophilic, everyone knows the difference between real and fictional children and newsflash: wanting to rape a fictional child is still weird. "Lolis are nothing like real, actual children." Why do they have the same proportions and behaviours of a real child, then? Dumbass. Stop trying to convince people that you are normal, because you will never seen as normal. You are a hyper-sexual freak of nature. Go quarantine yourself in a shitty forum with other monsters like you so normal members of society don't have to be constantly reminded that you exist.
By your OWN argument, everyone who goes to watch something like Saw films is a psychopath since they enjoy seeing people being tourtured and mutilated. You see there's this thing called fantasy/reality divide where we can make shit up, regardless of whatever it is, and then we can put that to one side and live our lives without that ever affecting how we act. It's similar to dreaming, I can have a dream where I'm flying in the air, doesn't mean I'll leap out of the window when I wake up thinking I can now do the same in reality.
The problem is those that CAN'T seperate fiction from reality and given how much the tranny issue, speech laws and people being targeted for drawn and AI art are in the West, this is a HUGE fucking problem in the West.
Wait, so you just relate everything to 'beating off' to it? No further querying of WHY people enjoy something or are attracted to something, just your entire moral philosophy on whether people can be in society is what they jerk off to in private.
God that sounds sad, it's like those evangelical Christians that drove people away from Christianity into the arms of the left....
No, I fully understand the telos of Lolicon, the purpose is its use and function and it is used as pornography by individuals with desires that are deeply disordered.
I get that you like jerkin off to our reading erotic stories about fictional children, but I’m equally allowed to feel the hatred towards you that the father of young children feels towards child predators.
I like how you assume I'm lolicon because I place importance on fiction/reality divide, great guilt by association there.
If we want to go REALLY edgy, here's an argument you will understand. Say some child you know is raped, the sick demons even film it, then imagine they get only 2-3 years in jail and all those people saying they care about children just blank it.
Now imagine there's a drawing online of some loli, could be sexual or not doesn't fucking matter it's a drawing, those same people that blanked the story about the real kid try reporting that artist to the FBI.
That's why I don't give a shit, this whole argument about drawings is dominated by the same people saying 'it's their culture'
The problem is those that CAN'T seperate fiction from reality and given how much the tranny issue, speech laws and people being targeted for drawn and AI art are in the West, this is a HUGE fucking problem in the West.
i've seen this argument a lot here. is it written down somewhere for you people to repeat?
the REALITY is you people are freaks of nature who like jacking it to kids and support those who like to jack it to kids. you are pedophiles. that is reality, no fiction involved to separate any of it from.
Everytime it's guilt by association as a counter argument, 'you defend loli artist so you must be a pedophile!'...
You're engaging in the very same behaviour that LOST the Christians and the right the culture war for decades to the left, because you invaded people's private fantasy and demanded it ascribe to a 'public morality'
If all you got is guilt by association as an argument, congrats on making sure Velma gets a season 3. If you don't like it, don't view it. Applying your morality to fictional work that can be created privately by one person is the level of thought policing even the Chinese don't do.
are you some sort of actual sub-80 IQ retard who thinks defending pedophiles is fine because technically you're not the one getting off to kids? do you seriously think you are a paragon of virtue defending the right of pedophiles to be pedophiles?
by that logic i support and defend the right of whoever wants to put a bullet through your thick skull, but i'll skirt right by Rule 2 here because i ain't saying i'll do it...
Welcome, gentlemen and maybe the 5 women in this place to another game of: RETARD, LEFTIST OR FED?!?
Our example today is this individual that confuses a drawing with actual children, guilt by association to claim the person they disagrees with molest children with the evidence of making it the fuck up then actively encouraging the murder of those with dissenting opinions.
So which is it viewers, is this person a secret leftist as it is the same tactics they use on social media, a fed provocateur or just a mentally handicapped retard?
your training to only hammer in your own broad-appeal, trendy talking points and never refute, counter, or even acknowledge anything said is obvious and pathetic.
"my fellow based and redpilled americans, we must allow the drawn child pornography into our societies or we will lose our free speech and die to the evil fed lefties, who are also somehow Christians, who are also evil."
I tried to find these tweets that the dude is talking about and I'm not seeing them. He posted an archive with a huge collection of Grummz's tweet history here (2.4 gigs over the course of 9 years worth of tweet history), but when I go through them I don't see any anime or sexualized pictures at all.
Here he posts a screenshot with filenames from the archive, implying that these files contain the lolisho in question, but I checked those filenames too, and out of all of them, I saw only 2 pictures of anime girls, and they both clearly had adult bodies, so calling them lolisho seems like a stretch.
The way he made it sound, I was expecting the archives to contain more images like this, but I couldn't find anything like that in the archives.
Yeah - see - the pictures are adult bodies but her character bio says she’s 2 so that means ur a pedo! Btw all body types are valid, gender is a social construct and we need to stamp out hate!
(And I’ll point out that NONE of the pictures have the characters in sexual positions or performing sexual acts… which reflects on this “journalist”’s viewpoint of things…)
If anyone forgets the context during GG, people were mocking the dress code of some con (PAX?) for banning "aggressive displays of navel." IIRC, it might have been the one where they made Nigiri go and change. Grummz and everyone else was shitposting about it. People were tweeting him pictures of navels and he was retweeting them because it was funny.
I'm always deeply suspicious when they "find" things on people they've actively hated for ever. Especially when the timing is convenient. Which in this case it absolutely is.
This is also literally a far-left Kotuku weirdo, who is pro transing the kids (and provided DIY hormone instruction)...pissed off that people don't like Dragon Age: Troonguard. (Twitter profile with link, links to DIY HRT and other stuff.) And for laughs, here is twelve hours ago when he worked for Kotaku. EDIT: Sounds like the dude is just a liar anyway, and the Kotaku connection was fake. It makes everything more confusing, because it's almost a parody account. Who knows what this guy actually supports, aside from apparently not Grummz. It took a turn for the weird since it throws everything into question since the dude seems to be a lying troll. Considering he seems to be friends with trannies and the like though, I assume the far left nonsense is correct, so everything except the Kotaku bit probably holds true.
Oh, also, he just got fired from Kotaku today, likely for his harassment campaign. (Fake, he's trolling) He's also absolutely obsessed with GamerGate...still. LOL.
It's hard to find an example of a more biased and disingenuous attack.
Also, I haven't and won't dig through the full archive, since this is all bullshit but, aside from being out of context which I'll get to in a bit...the stuff that this loser is using for "proof" isn't even bad; it's the cherrypicked stuff, it should be the worse of the worst. And it still trends more toward the cute than the "sexualized." Aside from maybe the one...which is unclear because the loser censored it, so who knows what it was. It's also from like a decade ago, I think. Which isn't an excuse if there was actual wrongdoing, but does show how much they're having to reach for this smear.
Also, most importantly, Grummz explains the context, toward the bottom of this archive of his Twitter today. He specifically asked for "aggressive naval" in response to PAX being retarded and banning that in cosplay. He was likely retweeting all kinds of stuff, not just anime girls. This is out of context to try to paint a specific picture of someone they hate.
The guy doing the "exposing" of Grummz is infinitely more suspicious than the target of his harassment attack, and should in no way ever, ever, ever be allowed around kids himself.
TL;DR: Extreme left troll who supports transing kids attacks Grummz out of context...
Every single one of you faggots using the "lolisho" pet name for your fetish and trying to make it look less degenerate than it is deserve a swift kick in the balls.
Shut the fuck up.
I don't buy the bullshit they're throwing at grummz, that's not what I'm addressing. Specifically you faggots using that term is similar to any of the other fags trying to twist language to alter perception. Stop trying to pretend your degenerate fetish isn't vile. Should it be illegal? No. Should you (especially you, ableist) constantly demand acceptance for it? No, and you should go sit on a hot branding iron.
What I do think is that it should be a fucking felony to call the drawings CP/pedophilic as that is an extreme act of defamation that gets people raped/killed/wrongfully arrested/wrongfully convicted, and that similar laws should be in place for similar crap like feral and pornographic acting depicting rape.
Oh, and the term "lolisho" was coined because there was quite literally no term for "pornographic artwork featuring underage characters" until it was coined as lolicon/shotacon only applies to anime/manga.
Might as well shit on people who play video games where you can kill NPCs, too. They have a murder fetish, right? The inability of leftards to separate fantasy from reality is staggering, but it's even more staggering when it's people on the right doing it because they should know better.
Nevermind the forever lolisho argument. It seems they're trying to slander him with a fucking screenshot of some file names and "just trust me bro", cause I can't find any of those alleged archives.
fucking screenshots!
I clicked through and it seemed to want me to download zip files to dig through, which I wasn’t going to do.
Heh, you did better than me, clicked through and just saw endless drivel and cat fights. Twitter is such hell to browse without logging in.
It's fictional so I don't give a fuck, like how I don't give a fuck about the HUGE amount of rape in women's erotica. I only start giving a fuck when they start applying fantasy to reality which feminists do looking at how many of them welcome 'rapeugees' to the west..
If you apply the term pedophile to anyone OTHER than those that directly abuse children or indirect by means of production, distribution and consumption of ACTUAL WITH REAL CHILDREN CP, you should lose all voting rights or minimum I should be allowed to bitch slap you for trying to dilute the meaning of the term.
Lolicons are pedophiles. Forming your sexuality around naked anime toddlers is bizarre, abnormal freak behaviour. You will be relentlessly mocked and there is nothing you can do about it. Constantly consuming and promoting pornography with pedophilic themes is a recognised red flag that an individual may be at high risk for potentially abusing real children. If that statement makes you feel cognitive dissonance, you have an adjustment disorder and need to seek professional help before you seriously hurt someone. You are a pedophile. Loli is inherently pedophilic, everyone knows the difference between real and fictional children and newsflash: wanting to rape a fictional child is still weird. "Lolis are nothing like real, actual children." Why do they have the same proportions and behaviours of a real child, then? Dumbass. Stop trying to convince people that you are normal, because you will never seen as normal. You are a hyper-sexual freak of nature. Go quarantine yourself in a shitty forum with other monsters like you so normal members of society don't have to be constantly reminded that you exist.
You will never be loved.
They're drawings NOT ACTUAL children.
By your OWN argument, everyone who goes to watch something like Saw films is a psychopath since they enjoy seeing people being tourtured and mutilated. You see there's this thing called fantasy/reality divide where we can make shit up, regardless of whatever it is, and then we can put that to one side and live our lives without that ever affecting how we act. It's similar to dreaming, I can have a dream where I'm flying in the air, doesn't mean I'll leap out of the window when I wake up thinking I can now do the same in reality.
The problem is those that CAN'T seperate fiction from reality and given how much the tranny issue, speech laws and people being targeted for drawn and AI art are in the West, this is a HUGE fucking problem in the West.
If they’re beating off to it, yeah then they’re pretty fucked and I don’t want to share a society with them. Same goes to folks who consume Lolicon.
Wait, so you just relate everything to 'beating off' to it? No further querying of WHY people enjoy something or are attracted to something, just your entire moral philosophy on whether people can be in society is what they jerk off to in private.
God that sounds sad, it's like those evangelical Christians that drove people away from Christianity into the arms of the left....
No, I fully understand the telos of Lolicon, the purpose is its use and function and it is used as pornography by individuals with desires that are deeply disordered.
I get that you like jerkin off to our reading erotic stories about fictional children, but I’m equally allowed to feel the hatred towards you that the father of young children feels towards child predators.
I like how you assume I'm lolicon because I place importance on fiction/reality divide, great guilt by association there.
If we want to go REALLY edgy, here's an argument you will understand. Say some child you know is raped, the sick demons even film it, then imagine they get only 2-3 years in jail and all those people saying they care about children just blank it.
Now imagine there's a drawing online of some loli, could be sexual or not doesn't fucking matter it's a drawing, those same people that blanked the story about the real kid try reporting that artist to the FBI.
That's why I don't give a shit, this whole argument about drawings is dominated by the same people saying 'it's their culture'
i've seen this argument a lot here. is it written down somewhere for you people to repeat?
the REALITY is you people are freaks of nature who like jacking it to kids and support those who like to jack it to kids. you are pedophiles. that is reality, no fiction involved to separate any of it from.
you should just lie down and give up.
Everytime it's guilt by association as a counter argument, 'you defend loli artist so you must be a pedophile!'...
You're engaging in the very same behaviour that LOST the Christians and the right the culture war for decades to the left, because you invaded people's private fantasy and demanded it ascribe to a 'public morality'
If all you got is guilt by association as an argument, congrats on making sure Velma gets a season 3. If you don't like it, don't view it. Applying your morality to fictional work that can be created privately by one person is the level of thought policing even the Chinese don't do.
are you some sort of actual sub-80 IQ retard who thinks defending pedophiles is fine because technically you're not the one getting off to kids? do you seriously think you are a paragon of virtue defending the right of pedophiles to be pedophiles?
by that logic i support and defend the right of whoever wants to put a bullet through your thick skull, but i'll skirt right by Rule 2 here because i ain't saying i'll do it...
Welcome, gentlemen and maybe the 5 women in this place to another game of: RETARD, LEFTIST OR FED?!?
Our example today is this individual that confuses a drawing with actual children, guilt by association to claim the person they disagrees with molest children with the evidence of making it the fuck up then actively encouraging the murder of those with dissenting opinions.
So which is it viewers, is this person a secret leftist as it is the same tactics they use on social media, a fed provocateur or just a mentally handicapped retard?
your training to only hammer in your own broad-appeal, trendy talking points and never refute, counter, or even acknowledge anything said is obvious and pathetic.
"my fellow based and redpilled americans, we must allow the drawn child pornography into our societies or we will lose our free speech and die to the evil fed lefties, who are also somehow Christians, who are also evil."
show me a picture of a real child who looks like Kanna Kamui
usually i try to not engage in lolicon-related arguments because the well is poisoned beyond belief, but i'll humour this here once
get the fuck out of here dude
fair, i phrased that poorly lol
Drawings are not real people.
I tried to find these tweets that the dude is talking about and I'm not seeing them. He posted an archive with a huge collection of Grummz's tweet history here (2.4 gigs over the course of 9 years worth of tweet history), but when I go through them I don't see any anime or sexualized pictures at all.
Here he posts a screenshot with filenames from the archive, implying that these files contain the lolisho in question, but I checked those filenames too, and out of all of them, I saw only 2 pictures of anime girls, and they both clearly had adult bodies, so calling them lolisho seems like a stretch.
The way he made it sound, I was expecting the archives to contain more images like this, but I couldn't find anything like that in the archives.
Yeah - see - the pictures are adult bodies but her character bio says she’s 2 so that means ur a pedo! Btw all body types are valid, gender is a social construct and we need to stamp out hate!
(And I’ll point out that NONE of the pictures have the characters in sexual positions or performing sexual acts… which reflects on this “journalist”’s viewpoint of things…)
That?
If anyone forgets the context during GG, people were mocking the dress code of some con (PAX?) for banning "aggressive displays of navel." IIRC, it might have been the one where they made Nigiri go and change. Grummz and everyone else was shitposting about it. People were tweeting him pictures of navels and he was retweeting them because it was funny.
That is their big gotcha.
Fuck, 9 months old is like a 12yo in Catgirl years. He's toast.
I'm always deeply suspicious when they "find" things on people they've actively hated for ever. Especially when the timing is convenient. Which in this case it absolutely is.
This is also literally a far-left Kotuku weirdo, who is pro transing the kids (and provided DIY hormone instruction)...pissed off that people don't like Dragon Age: Troonguard. (Twitter profile with link, links to DIY HRT and other stuff.) And for laughs, here is twelve hours ago when he worked for Kotaku. EDIT: Sounds like the dude is just a liar anyway, and the Kotaku connection was fake. It makes everything more confusing, because it's almost a parody account. Who knows what this guy actually supports, aside from apparently not Grummz. It took a turn for the weird since it throws everything into question since the dude seems to be a lying troll. Considering he seems to be friends with trannies and the like though, I assume the far left nonsense is correct, so everything except the Kotaku bit probably holds true.
Oh, also, he just got fired from Kotaku today, likely for his harassment campaign.(Fake, he's trolling) He's also absolutely obsessed with GamerGate...still. LOL.It's hard to find an example of a more biased and disingenuous attack.
Also, I haven't and won't dig through the full archive, since this is all bullshit but, aside from being out of context which I'll get to in a bit...the stuff that this loser is using for "proof" isn't even bad; it's the cherrypicked stuff, it should be the worse of the worst. And it still trends more toward the cute than the "sexualized." Aside from maybe the one...which is unclear because the loser censored it, so who knows what it was. It's also from like a decade ago, I think. Which isn't an excuse if there was actual wrongdoing, but does show how much they're having to reach for this smear.
Also, most importantly, Grummz explains the context, toward the bottom of this archive of his Twitter today. He specifically asked for "aggressive naval" in response to PAX being retarded and banning that in cosplay. He was likely retweeting all kinds of stuff, not just anime girls. This is out of context to try to paint a specific picture of someone they hate.
The guy doing the "exposing" of Grummz is infinitely more suspicious than the target of his harassment attack, and should in no way ever, ever, ever be allowed around kids himself.
TL;DR: Extreme left troll who supports transing kids attacks Grummz out of context...
even if they were right i don't care because they're hypocrites.
Every single one of you faggots using the "lolisho" pet name for your fetish and trying to make it look less degenerate than it is deserve a swift kick in the balls.
Shut the fuck up.
I don't buy the bullshit they're throwing at grummz, that's not what I'm addressing. Specifically you faggots using that term is similar to any of the other fags trying to twist language to alter perception. Stop trying to pretend your degenerate fetish isn't vile. Should it be illegal? No. Should you (especially you, ableist) constantly demand acceptance for it? No, and you should go sit on a hot branding iron.
What I do think is that it should be a fucking felony to call the drawings CP/pedophilic as that is an extreme act of defamation that gets people raped/killed/wrongfully arrested/wrongfully convicted, and that similar laws should be in place for similar crap like feral and pornographic acting depicting rape.
Oh, and the term "lolisho" was coined because there was quite literally no term for "pornographic artwork featuring underage characters" until it was coined as lolicon/shotacon only applies to anime/manga.
Might as well shit on people who play video games where you can kill NPCs, too. They have a murder fetish, right? The inability of leftards to separate fantasy from reality is staggering, but it's even more staggering when it's people on the right doing it because they should know better.