Everytime it's guilt by association as a counter argument, 'you defend loli artist so you must be a pedophile!'...
You're engaging in the very same behaviour that LOST the Christians and the right the culture war for decades to the left, because you invaded people's private fantasy and demanded it ascribe to a 'public morality'
If all you got is guilt by association as an argument, congrats on making sure Velma gets a season 3. If you don't like it, don't view it. Applying your morality to fictional work that can be created privately by one person is the level of thought policing even the Chinese don't do.
are you some sort of actual sub-80 IQ retard who thinks defending pedophiles is fine because technically you're not the one getting off to kids? do you seriously think you are a paragon of virtue defending the right of pedophiles to be pedophiles?
by that logic i support and defend the right of whoever wants to put a bullet through your thick skull, but i'll skirt right by Rule 2 here because i ain't saying i'll do it...
Welcome, gentlemen and maybe the 5 women in this place to another game of: RETARD, LEFTIST OR FED?!?
Our example today is this individual that confuses a drawing with actual children, guilt by association to claim the person they disagrees with molest children with the evidence of making it the fuck up then actively encouraging the murder of those with dissenting opinions.
So which is it viewers, is this person a secret leftist as it is the same tactics they use on social media, a fed provocateur or just a mentally handicapped retard?
your training to only hammer in your own broad-appeal, trendy talking points and never refute, counter, or even acknowledge anything said is obvious and pathetic.
"my fellow based and redpilled americans, we must allow the drawn child pornography into our societies or we will lose our free speech and die to the evil fed lefties, who are also somehow Christians, who are also evil."
So there's his argument viewers, glossing over the call for violence and the defamation, he spouts complete bullshit than actually addressing HIS OWN actions in a previous comment not realising his opponent is sarcastic as fuck to those he deems as just being virtue signalling imbeciles.
This could be leftist or retard, doubt it'll be fed, we'll maybe get more clues if he tries to argue back than getting a clue on who he's actually defaming without evidence.
Everytime it's guilt by association as a counter argument, 'you defend loli artist so you must be a pedophile!'...
You're engaging in the very same behaviour that LOST the Christians and the right the culture war for decades to the left, because you invaded people's private fantasy and demanded it ascribe to a 'public morality'
If all you got is guilt by association as an argument, congrats on making sure Velma gets a season 3. If you don't like it, don't view it. Applying your morality to fictional work that can be created privately by one person is the level of thought policing even the Chinese don't do.
are you some sort of actual sub-80 IQ retard who thinks defending pedophiles is fine because technically you're not the one getting off to kids? do you seriously think you are a paragon of virtue defending the right of pedophiles to be pedophiles?
by that logic i support and defend the right of whoever wants to put a bullet through your thick skull, but i'll skirt right by Rule 2 here because i ain't saying i'll do it...
Welcome, gentlemen and maybe the 5 women in this place to another game of: RETARD, LEFTIST OR FED?!?
Our example today is this individual that confuses a drawing with actual children, guilt by association to claim the person they disagrees with molest children with the evidence of making it the fuck up then actively encouraging the murder of those with dissenting opinions.
So which is it viewers, is this person a secret leftist as it is the same tactics they use on social media, a fed provocateur or just a mentally handicapped retard?
your training to only hammer in your own broad-appeal, trendy talking points and never refute, counter, or even acknowledge anything said is obvious and pathetic.
"my fellow based and redpilled americans, we must allow the drawn child pornography into our societies or we will lose our free speech and die to the evil fed lefties, who are also somehow Christians, who are also evil."
So there's his argument viewers, glossing over the call for violence and the defamation, he spouts complete bullshit than actually addressing HIS OWN actions in a previous comment not realising his opponent is sarcastic as fuck to those he deems as just being virtue signalling imbeciles.
This could be leftist or retard, doubt it'll be fed, we'll maybe get more clues if he tries to argue back than getting a clue on who he's actually defaming without evidence.