The question has always bounced around in my head, but it has become far more apparent in light of Biden "dropping" from the presidential race then completely disappearing from the public eye, along with moves made by the establishment to artificially prop up Cackles.
I've seen my fair share of theories and educated guesses as to who is really running the country at the moment, but I would like to hear your thoughts.
Bonus: How do you expect the upcoming debate between Trump and Special K to turn out?
I think the debate is voing to be boring. I don't see Trump going after Kamala. But if he pulls a Tulsi and goes at Harris hard, she'll crack again.
Media will be unhinged if he does that though
Sure, and it will be gloriously fun
I'm looking forward to hearing "Kamala is the leader we need! She's a go-getter! She's tough and gets things done! She a strong independent black* woman who don't need no man!" But simultaneously "waaaah, Trump is such a meanie, how dare he bully this poor girl!"
At the same time
Strong, Empowered and Independent Boss Babes who are helpless victims.
The Schrödinger's feminist.
I hope he makes her cry on live TV.
And piss her pants. Maybe shid and cum.
They'll be unhinged either way.
IMO he should either go on the offense or just treat her like the child she is.
I'm worried that Trump will lose the debate, because of Harris's prosecutorial background. I know people here think he won every single debate, but in terms of general audiences, polls claim he lost all 5 debates vs. Democrats he participated in.
On the other hand, that does confirm what people say, namely that debates don't matter.
And these polls are trustworthy? or just normal consensus making?
Plus remember that school that swapped trump and Hilary's lines and mannerisms onto a male and female actor and regardless of the arrangement Trump mannerisms won, but they won ESPECIALLY hard when a man acted like clinton?
We all know who actually won.
Oh yes that was fun thing to watch, haha
They all are skewed somewhat to anti-Trump, but if you compare the anti-Trump bias in regular polls - it's no more than a few percentage points. Also, I think there is a bias in who watches debates. I think it's more likely to be anti-Trump.
Alright, Still it is hard to get the amount of data hacking that they do with these polls, sometimes it is better just to listen to the normies in the few cases where they actually watched a debate and understood (not quite the right word, but in meaning that they actually listen to it and not just had it as noise or to summon the daily hate) it (otherwise you just get the media headlines haha).
What would winning the debate even constitute? It always seems to just be the media "deciding" who did, and we know how the media leans.
These debates are meant to set up as many hype lines to yourself and undermine lines to your opponent. Memes your base can use. Something Trump has been consistently able to do, while Harris has consistently failed to be able to hype herself and every anti-Trump line has already been said.
If it was a policy debate I might be worried, or if she had been running a campaign that seemed put together (or she herself every seemed sober and put together), but its a Snipe and Zinger show. Which Trump dominates at.
But he is a CONVICTED FELON!
How the debate will go:
"I am the best. The best. Some are good but I am the best."
(Manic cackling)
"I've done the best job, she's not done a great job, low energy, but I'm high energy."
(Manic cackling)
"Is.. she even going to talk?"
(Manic cackling).
->This just in! CNN reporting live, glorious Leader Harris, hallowed be her name, has thoroughly trounced the competition, as according to our 37 polls of 1 journo on staff, 19 times out of 20, 95% confidence.
All 5 includes the one against Biden this year? That kinda invalidates those polls lol
Take Trump out of it and view Kamala debating. She's not good at them.
She's bad at multi-candidate debates and Trump is very good at it.
She might be good at 1-on-1 debates, esp. as a prosecutor. The problem is that everyone likes to lull himself into overconfidence, Trump not being the least of them (though if it's true he's using Tulsi as a debate foil, that is great).
Why do you assume American prosecutors are master debators? They mostly just talk people with public defenders into signing plea bargains.
She didn't come off great in her debate with Pence.