Boomers are the problem. It sucks because boomers are very much a "can't live with them, can't live without them" kinda deal. Once boomers are mostly gone, Dems will be the de facto capital-P Party of the US at the federal level. Yet even for as long as boomers are still around, we have to deal with the fact that they're extraordinarily retarded. Which includes a ton of deepthroating skinless kosher cocks that need the moisture.
Then again, without boomers the GOP might actually be able to push a halfway appealing message. Boomers are why we can't tell Zionists to fuck off, it's why we can't look at "Reaganomics" the wrong way without some bloviating old gas bag flapping their gums about "communism" (even as they enjoy that sweet sweet government money and healthcare), etc.
Boomercons hate big government unless it's our military playing world police or private prisons giving police arrest quotas and incentivizing recidivism or tax money from young people who will never get back the money they put in helping their old asses stick around past their expiration date. I hope Reagan is boiling in shit like how Talmudic Jews think Jesus is.
Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but say Trump went on stage this week and denounced Jews as a whole. It would be based as hell sure, but boy the media backlash and goyslop retards will have a field day and it would probably cost Trump the election.
Not really much of a choice until people start getting angry
Israel was founded with the hopes of the Zionists creating a Racial Socialist state. This failed because they had to actually work with the jewish Orthodox factions to actually make something tangible, rather than just being terrorists.
Because of this, it morphed into a kind of religious state, that the Israeli right has been trying to make more theocratic, and the Israeli Left has tried to make more Socialist & Irreligious. To be honest, if the Arabs weren't constantly trying to destroy it, Israel might actually break up since the two sides are fundamentally irreconcilable.
As we've seen with Scotland, Ireland, and France; the Israeli Left have effectively abandoned the Racialist aspect of Zionism in all but named.
I'm literally holding an opinion piece (written by a local jewish democrat party proxy) from a newspaper that says
Brad Onishi, former evangelical minister who once identified as a Christian Nationalist, described it as, "an ideology that is based around the idea that this is a Christian nation, that this was founded as a Christian nation, and, therefore, it should be a Christian nation today, and should be so in the future."
...the 2024 elections will determine whether we save our Democratic Republic, Constitution, and democratic ideals created by the Founders of our county, or lose it all and plunge into authoritarianism and theocracy.
You are literally on the side of the NAACP, Unitarian Universalists, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
You can dislike Liberalism all you want, but it is what the country is founded on. The US was never ethno-nationalist. If it were, the states would have been considered the ethnicities. These were people that saw Virginian as an ethnicity. Not "the one, single, ethnic group that stretches from the Atlantic ocean to the Ural mountains".
And of course, you bastardize the concept of Ethno-Nationalism into Racial Nationalism, which the US was absolutely never even remotely close to being. This is because Race Nationalism didn't exist at the time. No one at the time of the founding would have said that we must ally with our Slovak brothers in racial solidarity.
In fact, you'd think it would be weird that Washington would have demanded we stay away from all European interaction, and Monroe would have demanded the elimination of all European influence in North and South America since the US was so devoted to 'white pride world wide'. It's like they didn't consider Europe to be their homeland, nor did they consider Europeans a people to be easily trusted.
And you are a rabid socialist mongrel. Quit pretending you aren't on the left, collectivist faggot.
Your existence is built around parasitizing any self-worth you have from the accomplishments of whites. As if slavs, germanics, francs, spaniards and such can all be pigeonholed into a single ethnic group for you to claim relation to - because you have no actual value to contribute, only the accomplishments of others' ancestors to steal. You even rage against christianity, like a good little lefty faggot.
Boy that sounds familiar doesn't it? Sounds like a certain group of so called KANGZ, no? You wuz vikangz?
The ship has pretty much sailed on bringing some terminally-online right-wingers back to reality. The Race War trap that the neo-marxist/commies and jew-adjacent elite have been setting up for the past few decades by continuing to foster anti-Whtie sentiment in media and federal policy has caught its prey. People will just return to their gut animal instinct and death drive. The nation's going to fall apart eventually, the only question is how atomized and brutal the result will be.
The Race War trap that the neo-marxist/commies and jew-adjacent elite have been setting up for the past few decades by continuing to foster anti-Whtie sentiment in media and federal policy has caught its prey.
I'm nearly 100% certain that there will be open ethnic violence in the US in my lifetime. I'd be surprised if it hasn't erupted inside of 10 years.
I don't want that, and I am not encouraging it. I'm not even "right wing." But you'd better believe that I'm not interested in trying to ingratiate myself to racists who hate me and will have no issue with siding with "racists" who don't.
It's an understandable point. I just still refuse to play the deranged character that the enemy wants and try to discourage political allies from doing the same.
If some want to let it slide, fine, but I won't take any shit for refusing to engage in the same (my main concern). I would have no problem destroying both those who hate me for my race and those who don't but instead hate me for not participating in every single one of their causes.
They aren't right wing. They're crypto leftists. They support centralized government and worship a socialist goblin - the prime difference between the wehraboo fags trying to subvert the right, and stalinist tankie faggots, is their false idol, not their ideology.
Those Terminally Online Rightoids are simply Leftists, because that's what Racial Socialism is. Worse, they fucking know it too because a lot are former Bernie Bros (not Libertarians which they claim here, the actual stats and admissions speak differently); and the genuine populist response is aggressively Civic National and Assimilatory. The Populist Right want Americanism. Not racialism.
Also, again and again, I have to point out that it is whites that are the most fervently, politically, anti-White that prevent any kind of generalized white racial solidarity. Specifically Anglos. You have racial grievance mongers wanting racial solidarity with the demographic that utterly despises them. This shit don't work.
Democrats are so insane that it's easy to forget how cucked Republicans are (save for a handful of exceptions)
Nenonazis are communists. Just pro white instead of anti white. Multiple things can be true.
Is it hard having a room temp IQ?
I don't have that problem. Do you?
Boomers are the problem. It sucks because boomers are very much a "can't live with them, can't live without them" kinda deal. Once boomers are mostly gone, Dems will be the de facto capital-P Party of the US at the federal level. Yet even for as long as boomers are still around, we have to deal with the fact that they're extraordinarily retarded. Which includes a ton of deepthroating skinless kosher cocks that need the moisture.
Then again, without boomers the GOP might actually be able to push a halfway appealing message. Boomers are why we can't tell Zionists to fuck off, it's why we can't look at "Reaganomics" the wrong way without some bloviating old gas bag flapping their gums about "communism" (even as they enjoy that sweet sweet government money and healthcare), etc.
Boomercons hate big government unless it's our military playing world police or private prisons giving police arrest quotas and incentivizing recidivism or tax money from young people who will never get back the money they put in helping their old asses stick around past their expiration date. I hope Reagan is boiling in shit like how Talmudic Jews think Jesus is.
Stop noticing things, goy.
Like I said before, our choices are the jew party or the gayniggerwoman party (also the jew party).
Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but say Trump went on stage this week and denounced Jews as a whole. It would be based as hell sure, but boy the media backlash and goyslop retards will have a field day and it would probably cost Trump the election.
Not really much of a choice until people start getting angry
This is a fascinating table. Sort it by each of the three headers and note the different positions of Israel, USA, Liberia, South Africa and Japan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_ethnic_and_cultural_diversity_level
The US is a Civic Nationalist state, faggot.
"Free white persons of good character"
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17txxxOxEG/x/c/4ZDtRV0M4Yr
Because your argument doesn't get more right no matter how many times you repeat it.
So is Israel since you don't think jewish is an ethnicity
Israel was founded with the hopes of the Zionists creating a Racial Socialist state. This failed because they had to actually work with the jewish Orthodox factions to actually make something tangible, rather than just being terrorists.
Because of this, it morphed into a kind of religious state, that the Israeli right has been trying to make more theocratic, and the Israeli Left has tried to make more Socialist & Irreligious. To be honest, if the Arabs weren't constantly trying to destroy it, Israel might actually break up since the two sides are fundamentally irreconcilable.
As we've seen with Scotland, Ireland, and France; the Israeli Left have effectively abandoned the Racialist aspect of Zionism in all but named.
that's not what the founding fathers said https://files.catbox.moe/1dttba.png
The same founding fathers argued about whether or not Germans were included in that because they didn't think non-Anglos and Catholics could work in a
LIBERAL
Republic.
That is the primary question. Are other ethnic groups or religions capable of Liberalism, that's actually the experiment.
Not to mention this covers federal immigration only, not naturalization, and not state citizenship.
We all know that you jews are against White ethno states. You don't need to keep trying to spell it out for us
White isn't an ethnicity. "White" people in america are literally erasing their ethnic roots with this nonsense
"White" isn't an ethnicity.
Irish is an ethnicity. That is why the Irish have a right to an ethno-state.
Yeah, but nobody supports the Irish people's right to an ethno-state except a few evil right-wing Nazis.
You're not a Nazi, are you? That'd be anti-Semitic.
The brits are jews now?
You are repeating Democrat talking points again.
I'm literally holding an opinion piece (written by a local jewish democrat party proxy) from a newspaper that says
You are literally on the side of the NAACP, Unitarian Universalists, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
I don't give a shit about your newspaper?
You can dislike Liberalism all you want, but it is what the country is founded on. The US was never ethno-nationalist. If it were, the states would have been considered the ethnicities. These were people that saw Virginian as an ethnicity. Not "the one, single, ethnic group that stretches from the Atlantic ocean to the Ural mountains".
And of course, you bastardize the concept of Ethno-Nationalism into Racial Nationalism, which the US was absolutely never even remotely close to being. This is because Race Nationalism didn't exist at the time. No one at the time of the founding would have said that we must ally with our Slovak brothers in racial solidarity.
In fact, you'd think it would be weird that Washington would have demanded we stay away from all European interaction, and Monroe would have demanded the elimination of all European influence in North and South America since the US was so devoted to 'white pride world wide'. It's like they didn't consider Europe to be their homeland, nor did they consider Europeans a people to be easily trusted.
You are a democrat.
I am a Libertarian.
Oh so you're a child.
No, just a lunatic.
And you are a rabid socialist mongrel. Quit pretending you aren't on the left, collectivist faggot.
Your existence is built around parasitizing any self-worth you have from the accomplishments of whites. As if slavs, germanics, francs, spaniards and such can all be pigeonholed into a single ethnic group for you to claim relation to - because you have no actual value to contribute, only the accomplishments of others' ancestors to steal. You even rage against christianity, like a good little lefty faggot.
Boy that sounds familiar doesn't it? Sounds like a certain group of so called KANGZ, no? You wuz vikangz?
Faggot.
The ship has pretty much sailed on bringing some terminally-online right-wingers back to reality. The Race War trap that the neo-marxist/commies and jew-adjacent elite have been setting up for the past few decades by continuing to foster anti-Whtie sentiment in media and federal policy has caught its prey. People will just return to their gut animal instinct and death drive. The nation's going to fall apart eventually, the only question is how atomized and brutal the result will be.
I'm nearly 100% certain that there will be open ethnic violence in the US in my lifetime. I'd be surprised if it hasn't erupted inside of 10 years.
I don't want that, and I am not encouraging it. I'm not even "right wing." But you'd better believe that I'm not interested in trying to ingratiate myself to racists who hate me and will have no issue with siding with "racists" who don't.
It's an understandable point. I just still refuse to play the deranged character that the enemy wants and try to discourage political allies from doing the same.
If some want to let it slide, fine, but I won't take any shit for refusing to engage in the same (my main concern). I would have no problem destroying both those who hate me for my race and those who don't but instead hate me for not participating in every single one of their causes.
They aren't right wing. They're crypto leftists. They support centralized government and worship a socialist goblin - the prime difference between the wehraboo fags trying to subvert the right, and stalinist tankie faggots, is their false idol, not their ideology.
Those Terminally Online Rightoids are simply Leftists, because that's what Racial Socialism is. Worse, they fucking know it too because a lot are former Bernie Bros (not Libertarians which they claim here, the actual stats and admissions speak differently); and the genuine populist response is aggressively Civic National and Assimilatory. The Populist Right want Americanism. Not racialism.
Also, again and again, I have to point out that it is whites that are the most fervently, politically, anti-White that prevent any kind of generalized white racial solidarity. Specifically Anglos. You have racial grievance mongers wanting racial solidarity with the demographic that utterly despises them. This shit don't work.