In light of the English behaving like racists and demanding that foreigners not murder their children, its time to revisit language.
Bonus article about the Irish being replaced and a JQ in one
A country is a bit of land. A nation is a group of people. And a State is the body that governs a nation that lives in a country. These words are not synonyms! Democracy is rule of the people, ie the nation. Without nationalism, democracy is, by definition, a form of tyranny. If the nation (that is to say the people) is not in charge, then they are slaves to the state. If foreigners are given equal preference to nationals then the State is merely a tyrannical body the runs the country (a bit of land) as an economic block. The worst tyrants of the middle ages and the ancient period dindn't even try this.
Elites seem determined to replace their working class with immigrants.
I don’t think its for votes.
I think they are self-hating whites.
Two Tier-Kier is now trying to crush peaceful protests like Trudeau did with Stompy-the-Horse.
He is deeply unpopular. Tommy Robinson gets more supporters:
https://x.com/trobinsonnewera/status/1819096798486532203
Kier stayed silent when BLM injured 28 cops. He only tweeted a photo of him kneeling 🤮
Supply and demand also apply to labor, you know. Flooding the labor market with foreigners who are used to working for practically slave wages in the shithole countries they're imported from suppresses wages for everyone.
Where will they get these white whores?
Comment deleted. Repost it.
Are you a TS….tribute account lol?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
While this comment could have simply been about white-jews within western intelligentsia, the comments actually focused on how jewish subversion is racially based, even such that a 'mixed race' jew is by definition a jew and not white, and is still part of the intertemporal race war conspiracy.
Why did you think deleting my post so that you wouldn’t have to answer the questions was going to work?
They banned you outright now.
... A conspiracy does not imply it is false. The dialectic does.
Also,
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
As Judeo-Capitalism is still a historical dialectic that will inherently violate Rule 16. I'm confused why you have to bring that here when you literally have your own community for it.
Get rid of rule 16. I'm tired of finding these graveyards of deleted comments.
Gonna have to unscored the whole sub pretty soon.
Honestly, Rule 16 has proven it's value more than I expected.
In that it allows you to suppress discussions that you personally don't like?
It does not serve the community in any capacity. It only halts discussions that the rest of us are interested in having.
you are the problem. you need to go.
Haha faggot
Based
Again, Judeo-Capitalism is a) a nonsense historical dialectic, and b) an inherent violation of Rule 16.
Yeah the civil war ended the confederation of states through a massive federal power grab
We're turning into economic zones
Some more fun definitions.
A nation-state is a state whose members belong to and govern a singular nation.
America, by definition, has never been a nation-state and is definitely not one now. In the early to mid 20th century, America was comprised of 8-12 nations (broadly speaking, each stereotype was a nation: east coast, southern, Appalachian, Midwestern, Scandinavian north, etc.)
An empire is a state that governs multiple nations. "The thousand nations of the Persian empire..."
I've heard that the founding fathers didn't like political parties controlling things, but they did expect that each state would basically be its own political party arguing its people's interests.
I’m curious why your submission is “allowed” but comments that agree with it are banned.
You know why
I genuinely don’t. If it was one side of the coin allowed and the other banned, at least that would make holistic sense. Instead, agreement with the submission is banned (literally; accounts banned, not just comments deleted) but the submission itself is allowed. Is this just bait or something?
I'm thinking bait. I caught a suspension for a day for comments on this post. Now, it was just a suspension but I've been pretty careful about what I say on here due to the makeup if most of this board.
The OP is stating facts and definitions basically, a far cry from calls for (ethnically-defined) violence.
Tangentially, I think the existence of people like Ron Unz, Ilana Mercer, Henry Makow, Bobby Fischer, Glen Greenwald, Norman Finkelstein, and historical figures like Nicholas Donin and johannes piffercorn show that the issue we all want to talk about isn’t genetically deterministic (though that case could be made, or that it has a genetic basis, and if it’s going to be raised it should be supported with evidence not just presented as a given. The case could also be made, like Kevin Macdonald does in his book The Culture of Critique, that what we observe could be almost entirely cultural as well). Discussion of these topics doesn’t necessitate discussion/planning of acts of violence. Hence the fine line the Unz Report walks, and the similar line the mod here has to walk. I find he is quite reasonable if he is treated like a reasonable person. If the conversation starts with calling someone a kike shill I find it less likely productive discourse will ever occur
So we’re back to “harmful words”, but only with respect to one specific demographic. Always kid’s gloves and walking on eggshells around exactly one tribe, and yet you wonder: why the hostility? Your performative confusion is just another part of the infuriating play we all must endure, day after day.
I’m against posts that degrade the forum, in general. That’s why I make fun of imp, the israel simps, and the unproductive blackpillers
Who is the you in this statement? Surely not me. No what I wonder about is why the sudden attempt to shift the mental and physical landscape of the forum by people who have spent the last 3 years largely mocking this place. Maybe you guys should deeply ponder why you want to have these discussions here in the first place, as opposed to the forum which has been consecrated in that purpose for all this time. I would wager it has something to do with “the quality of discussion”. If that ends up being the case, ask yourself why you’re choosing to act in ways which degrade the quality of discussion here down to the level present there.
>Wahhhh wahhhh everyone who doesn’t want the forum to consist of nothing but people calling eachother kike shills is a kike shill
Kike defender, opinion ignored. Next!
>Sockpuppet account with no posts proves my point
Lmfao
Somewhat related to your title that speaks to the level of political knowledge of some normies.
A friend said that communists are right wing, it was in the context of EU elections. His logic was that right wing are nationalists and since communists are all about the state and state and nation are synonyms it means that communism is right-wing.
As context, he was serious, we were not drinking or smoking weed at the time.
Horseshoe theory only exists because of how woefully inadequate a single axis left vs. right spectrum is at describing possible political positions. Even the two axis compass falls short. The best I've seen so far is a three axis triangle, with a smaller triangle inside showing the current Overton window; but that's probably too complicated for normies to grok, since they're all trapped in a false dichotomy.
I agree in part but for this particular discussion he was just wrong. Nation and state are not the same, communism how I see it is anti-nationalist. Hence why communists destroy the national identity, art and architecture. After all communism in itself is globalist in scope.
Nationalism is not left or right, there are both left and right-wing nationalist parties, the reasons that we consider nationalism as being on the right is because we got brainwashed in to thinking nazis are right-wing and since is hard to sell socialism as right-wing they had to say that the nationalist part is what makes them right-wing.
That and because communism is anti-nationalist while being extreme left.
Communism is necessarily globalist because it cannot abide the existence of capitalism anywhere else. Everywhere must be communist for communism to thrive, although tyranny will still be required.
Nationalism is necessarily fascist because the good of the nation eventually collides with - and must supersede - the interests of the corporations. Nationalism must override corporatism.
There are implied values inherent to almost every economic system, and those values generate inevitable consequences.
These are important distinctions to make.
It's why nationalism is supposedly bad but patriotism is good. So nation is bad? But not certain nations...
It's all so perverted so they can continue to worm their way further into our national institutions.
I've gone over this before on Reddit: The Definitions of Patriotism, Jingoism, and Nationalism
It is an inherent part of totalitarianism that the nation and the state are one and the same. This is actually the nature of Fascism: the people are the state, and the state are the people, explicitly. The state is the intertemporal manifestation of the people, in actuality, and without dissent or variance. This is why the the Communists believed that a "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" was more Democratic than "Bourgois Parliamentarianism"
States are typically not only economic managers, but also social and occasionally moral managers.
Democracy is not exactly the rule of the nation. Demos-cracy: "The People's State". It isn't really any kind of self-rule. It is the state, ruling on the claimed behalf of the people, or as the people. The rule by the nation doesn't really follow Democracy, but it's quite hard for that to be the case anyway. Again, Fascism is the final form of a Democratic rule. Where there is no difference between the people and the state.
And “the people” is only a coherent category so long as they are racially/ethnically homogeneous. Multiculturalism/multiracialism has repeatedly been demonstrated as a dysfunctional and dysgenic artificial construct, forced upon various “peoples” under threat of violence, and always resulting in the deterioration and destruction of those peoples.
Fascism is actually the first and final forms of the nation aka the people aka any coherent racial/ethnic cohort that has achieved total self-governance. The good of the nation aka the people supersedes all other concerns, including the interests of the corporations who would otherwise demand the destruction of the nation via immigration, outsourcing, “free” trade, etc. The people began in “fascism”, were subverted into globalism, and then the race is on to restore fascism before the nation is irrevocably annihilated.
None of this is true. Ethnic homogeneity is never requied for a nation. Ethnic similarity can be. Almost no nation, even tribes, are purely ethnically homogeneous. The Iroquois weren't ethnically homogeneous. Multi-ethnic nations tend to be the norm. Multi-cultural is the aberration.
Fascism is explicitly NOT ethnically homogeneous. It's the totalitarian form of CIVIC Nationalism. You're trying to avoid specifically saying National Socialism. You are advocating for a Gleichaltung of the race into a Volksgemeinschaft. To Socialize the population into a socialist racial commune. The good of the nation is purely decided by the head of the state and nothing else. All aspects of the people must be forced into accepting that ONLY the state can determine the good of the people, and any of the people who disagree or dissent must be killed or coerced by any means necessary. This includes mass migration or any other bullshit so long as that decision is made. It's why a half dozen NSDAP members founded the German Green Party. Same for why BLM supports Palestine, why the SNP supports mass migration, same with Sin Fein.
Globalism is merely a Supra-Nationalism. The greatest threat to the nation under Fascism and National Socialism, is the eradication of the nation by the state as it homogenizes the people into the state.
With nationalism, Democracy is a form of tyranny too.
Nationalism is properly understood as cultural homogeneity, which is historically only possible under ethnic/racial homogeneity. A “tyrannical” democracy is actually a highly functional and moral system for the governance of a sufficiently united people. Leftism is a retarded/evil campaign to enforce an ideological unity upon peoples who have been weakened by indoctrination and invasion.
When the people are invaded and replaced, to the extent that the nation becomes officially multiethnic, then the new “people” invariably turn sectarian. The democracy becomes an ethnic referendum, and the number of people who suffer under such a system is directly proportional to its “diversity”.
Again, leftists think they can fix this by forcing everyone to worship anal sex and blacks. Diversity is the deliberate introduction of disunity, and the solution is communism + fucking kids. It’s a spiritual war, and the demons fear only “fascism”.