In light of the English behaving like racists and demanding that foreigners not murder their children, its time to revisit language.
Bonus article about the Irish being replaced and a JQ in one
A country is a bit of land. A nation is a group of people. And a State is the body that governs a nation that lives in a country. These words are not synonyms! Democracy is rule of the people, ie the nation. Without nationalism, democracy is, by definition, a form of tyranny. If the nation (that is to say the people) is not in charge, then they are slaves to the state. If foreigners are given equal preference to nationals then the State is merely a tyrannical body the runs the country (a bit of land) as an economic block. The worst tyrants of the middle ages and the ancient period dindn't even try this.
I’m curious why your submission is “allowed” but comments that agree with it are banned.
You know why
I genuinely don’t. If it was one side of the coin allowed and the other banned, at least that would make holistic sense. Instead, agreement with the submission is banned (literally; accounts banned, not just comments deleted) but the submission itself is allowed. Is this just bait or something?
I'm thinking bait. I caught a suspension for a day for comments on this post. Now, it was just a suspension but I've been pretty careful about what I say on here due to the makeup if most of this board.
The OP is stating facts and definitions basically, a far cry from calls for (ethnically-defined) violence.
Tangentially, I think the existence of people like Ron Unz, Ilana Mercer, Henry Makow, Bobby Fischer, Glen Greenwald, Norman Finkelstein, and historical figures like Nicholas Donin and johannes piffercorn show that the issue we all want to talk about isn’t genetically deterministic (though that case could be made, or that it has a genetic basis, and if it’s going to be raised it should be supported with evidence not just presented as a given. The case could also be made, like Kevin Macdonald does in his book The Culture of Critique, that what we observe could be almost entirely cultural as well). Discussion of these topics doesn’t necessitate discussion/planning of acts of violence. Hence the fine line the Unz Report walks, and the similar line the mod here has to walk. I find he is quite reasonable if he is treated like a reasonable person. If the conversation starts with calling someone a kike shill I find it less likely productive discourse will ever occur
So we’re back to “harmful words”, but only with respect to one specific demographic. Always kid’s gloves and walking on eggshells around exactly one tribe, and yet you wonder: why the hostility? Your performative confusion is just another part of the infuriating play we all must endure, day after day.
Kike defender, opinion ignored. Next!