The individual as the atom of society is Enlightenment poison. The irreducible unit of society is the family, with its non-consensual responsibilities and obligations.
Having responsibilities and obligations does not remove someone's free will.
Hell, you have responsibilities and obligations to yourself: you have to feed yourself. If you don't, you'll die. Does that mean you don't have the right to exercise free will?
A family is more important than an individual, or the individuals that make it up.
Only a man and a woman can come together to produce children (i.e. a family). This ability to procreate continues the genetics of the man, the woman, the ancestors, the community/tribe, the nation, and the species. If your philosophy results individual freedoms but a birth rate below replacement level, then your philosophy is flawed, in part or whole.
This doesn't necessarily mean that individual freedoms should be curtailed, but that they're not the only consideration. Whether retarded brainwashed mainstream right wingers want to admit it or not, groups exist. We group up to pursue mutual goals. This is called collectivism.
For a group to continue to exist, several things must be done.
The group must protect itself.
The group must protect its members.
The group must protect its borders, and gatekeep out undesirables.
The group must control who enters.
The group must espouse, enforce, and maintain certain standards, ideas, philosophies, and/or traits to keep the group healthy and homogeneous (along the lines of why the group exists in the first place), and keep the mutual goals of the group clear and followed by everyone within the group.
The group must pursue things which enable it to continue to exist.
All of the above must be followed. If even one rule is abandoned, the group will cease to exist at some point in the future, depending on circumstance.
The mainstream right has swallowed the lie that individualism, by itself, is meritorious. It's not. It leads to death, since it completely abandons the group/collective. Healthy individuals produce a stronger collective, but healthy individuals who are atomized are really easy to conquer and control.
Some collective interests are more important than individual freedoms. like survival, and continuation of the species. People used to know this, which is why certain "freedoms" were curtailed (like women voting and entering the workforce en masse). Animals understand this intrinsically, too, as many will often die to protect their offspring, or even die so they can reproduce. And yet, so many coddled people today can't muster the courage to lay down their comforts to even express that anything is above "individual freedoms".
Absolute freedom is satanic. Jesus seeks willing bondslaves. At the same time, the existence of freedom is divine. God designed us to exercise free will.
The entire test is to choose to not exercise it always. To defer to God and those He puts over you. That's it. Most will fail.
the freedom to choose our slavery is God's greatest gift to man. everyone is a slave to something - to get to pick to be a slave to Truth and Goodness is the highest honor.
It's driven me up a wall how people keep falling into this trap. "History rhymes" may be a wise adage, but the more it's internalized, the more of a black/doom pill it becomes.
Fanilies that share my ideologies have more value to me than any communist that only shares my skin tone ever will. Blood relations that harbor ideology hostile to the health and welfare of myself and my nation are my enemy.
Ideology is a choice that demonstrates far more about people's character than the circumstances of their birth.
Ideology is a choice that demonstrates far more about people's character than the circumstances of their birth.
I'd dispute this on the basis of most people's susceptibility to industrial scale propaganda. Most people are wired to be followers and do as they are told, so the circumstances of their birth(being born into a society that propagandizes a particular ideology) does in fact have a significant influence.
He also opposes women's suffrage despite his claims that "ideology is a choice that demonstrates far more about people's character than the circumstances of their birth."
I don't oppose women's suffrage specifically you retarded goober and you KNOW this because you've tried this faggoty word twisting leftist tactic before. I oppose universal suffrage, because democracy is shit. Universal. As in, everyone getting a vote with no restrictions. That's not women's suffrage specifically, you fucking wehraboo maggot.
You are a dishonest, manipulative swine that mirrors your supposed idol's own oft quoted lines about arguing with a jew. Get fucked, goblin.
It has an influence, but retards that are led by the nose are not the ones that will prove exceptional and differentiate themselves from their group stereotype. Those NPCs can be treated as what they are. Not being a collectivist doesn't mean every person has value - it means not deciding a person's value based on their immutable characteristics.
Rejecting collectivism doesn't mean tolerating Jamal criminal and his pack of goons. Collectivism does mean preferring your own race's trash over actually valuable people of another race.
I'd rather be "collectivist" and recognize from a distance that Jamal and his pack of goons are a pack of goons rather than recognize that after getting jumped.
Not always. Genetics, luck and God all have a hand to play and some people are far more likely to be rotten. But the gene pool is broad, and both black and white are not even specific ethnicities. Even within specific ethnic groups, like say italians from a region of italy, there will be good and bad genetic lines, and the vast majorty of people raised in a healthy society will be better than they would be in a sick society. But there are always exceptions.
Honestly, claiming "white" as a monocultural ethnic group is one of the more retarded things we deal with in the US.
The individual as the atom of society is Enlightenment poison. The irreducible unit of society is the family, with its non-consensual responsibilities and obligations.
From there, recognition of tribe is inescapable.
This is a brilliantly evil way to argue that individuals should not have rights or exercise their free will.
Having responsibilities and obligations does not remove someone's free will.
Hell, you have responsibilities and obligations to yourself: you have to feed yourself. If you don't, you'll die. Does that mean you don't have the right to exercise free will?
A family is more important than an individual, or the individuals that make it up.
Only a man and a woman can come together to produce children (i.e. a family). This ability to procreate continues the genetics of the man, the woman, the ancestors, the community/tribe, the nation, and the species. If your philosophy results individual freedoms but a birth rate below replacement level, then your philosophy is flawed, in part or whole.
This doesn't necessarily mean that individual freedoms should be curtailed, but that they're not the only consideration. Whether retarded brainwashed mainstream right wingers want to admit it or not, groups exist. We group up to pursue mutual goals. This is called collectivism.
For a group to continue to exist, several things must be done.
The group must protect itself.
The group must protect its members.
The group must protect its borders, and gatekeep out undesirables.
The group must control who enters.
The group must espouse, enforce, and maintain certain standards, ideas, philosophies, and/or traits to keep the group healthy and homogeneous (along the lines of why the group exists in the first place), and keep the mutual goals of the group clear and followed by everyone within the group.
The group must pursue things which enable it to continue to exist.
All of the above must be followed. If even one rule is abandoned, the group will cease to exist at some point in the future, depending on circumstance.
The mainstream right has swallowed the lie that individualism, by itself, is meritorious. It's not. It leads to death, since it completely abandons the group/collective. Healthy individuals produce a stronger collective, but healthy individuals who are atomized are really easy to conquer and control.
Some collective interests are more important than individual freedoms. like survival, and continuation of the species. People used to know this, which is why certain "freedoms" were curtailed (like women voting and entering the workforce en masse). Animals understand this intrinsically, too, as many will often die to protect their offspring, or even die so they can reproduce. And yet, so many coddled people today can't muster the courage to lay down their comforts to even express that anything is above "individual freedoms".
Absolute freedom is satanic. Jesus seeks willing bondslaves. At the same time, the existence of freedom is divine. God designed us to exercise free will.
The entire test is to choose to not exercise it always. To defer to God and those He puts over you. That's it. Most will fail.
the freedom to choose our slavery is God's greatest gift to man. everyone is a slave to something - to get to pick to be a slave to Truth and Goodness is the highest honor.
How convenient it is that these texts were published by the church, who just so happen to be the gateway to god, apparently.
Thus the issue with polarization, the neglect of balance
It's driven me up a wall how people keep falling into this trap. "History rhymes" may be a wise adage, but the more it's internalized, the more of a black/doom pill it becomes.
low IQs love absolutes and polarization. it simplifies the world to the point where they can talk about society and think they're smart.
Fanilies that share my ideologies have more value to me than any communist that only shares my skin tone ever will. Blood relations that harbor ideology hostile to the health and welfare of myself and my nation are my enemy.
Ideology is a choice that demonstrates far more about people's character than the circumstances of their birth.
I'd dispute this on the basis of most people's susceptibility to industrial scale propaganda. Most people are wired to be followers and do as they are told, so the circumstances of their birth(being born into a society that propagandizes a particular ideology) does in fact have a significant influence.
Look at the patterns from that account.
"muh skin tone"
He also opposes women's suffrage despite his claims that "ideology is a choice that demonstrates far more about people's character than the circumstances of their birth."
I don't oppose women's suffrage specifically you retarded goober and you KNOW this because you've tried this faggoty word twisting leftist tactic before. I oppose universal suffrage, because democracy is shit. Universal. As in, everyone getting a vote with no restrictions. That's not women's suffrage specifically, you fucking wehraboo maggot.
You are a dishonest, manipulative swine that mirrors your supposed idol's own oft quoted lines about arguing with a jew. Get fucked, goblin.
It has an influence, but retards that are led by the nose are not the ones that will prove exceptional and differentiate themselves from their group stereotype. Those NPCs can be treated as what they are. Not being a collectivist doesn't mean every person has value - it means not deciding a person's value based on their immutable characteristics.
Rejecting collectivism doesn't mean tolerating Jamal criminal and his pack of goons. Collectivism does mean preferring your own race's trash over actually valuable people of another race.
I'd rather be "collectivist" and recognize from a distance that Jamal and his pack of goons are a pack of goons rather than recognize that after getting jumped.
Which means a black baby born and raised amongst a civilized society will always be better than a white baby born and raised in a trash society.
Not always. Genetics, luck and God all have a hand to play and some people are far more likely to be rotten. But the gene pool is broad, and both black and white are not even specific ethnicities. Even within specific ethnic groups, like say italians from a region of italy, there will be good and bad genetic lines, and the vast majorty of people raised in a healthy society will be better than they would be in a sick society. But there are always exceptions.
Honestly, claiming "white" as a monocultural ethnic group is one of the more retarded things we deal with in the US.
responsibilities and obligations to whoY?
Theocratic people would say God.
(Actual) Fascists would say The State.
Communists would say the People.
These are all excuses to enslave people to serve a master.
The real answer, in my opinion, is to yourself, your family, and your friends.