I found replacement theory to be mostly real, the mistake everyone is making is that they think it's on racial lines.
they're replacing citizens who have lived in a prosperous society with immigrants who are desperate and will take whatever they can get. citizens who know what prosperity looks like will do everything they can to hold on to it. immigrants coming from worst conditions will blindly follow the party's orders and keep the party in power so long as their new conditions are marginally better than their old conditions.
in the grand scheme of things, they don't care about replacing a race so much as replacing a people.
You must've missed the parts where every regressive entity has been denouncing "whiteness," disparaging traditions of the host countries, or celebrating each time someone says white people are on track to become a minority somewhere.
And you missed the part where blacks still use terms like oreo, coconut and uncle tom unironically whenever they meet another black who leaves the proverbial plantation project and aspires to be more than another hoodlum.
Same thing with asians who are often treated as schrodinger minority or honorary whites depending on the narrative.
It's not ONLY an attack on white people but white western culture as well.
Black people don't seem to mind the successes of their own celebrities, athletes, businessmen, academics, or politicians. Even in subjects seeped in Western cultural norms. It's when they, to your point anyways, pick up viewpoints that might threaten the easy gibs, that the black community seems to lash out.
Meanwhile, some do seem to mind when others encroach upon their turf, so to speak. Consider white rapper Eminem, white basketball players Caitlin Clark and Nikola Jokić, or this story about non-black drum majors in historically black colleges. Why would that be the case if they could potentially increase the exposure and influence of their culture against Western norms?
the individuals I listed are all successful black people who don't tow the progressive party line. hence they are "white adjacent" according to progressives.
and you will also notice that whiteness is a label that is thrown at anyone who follows a successful American lifestyle. it doesn't matter if they are white, black, asian, hispanic, or anything else. if they are free, and are prospering under freedom, they are exhibiting "whiteness".
even though they code it along racial lines, the actual lines are between citizens and new immigrants.
you miss the point. to them, Indonesians who are successful in a free society are no longer Indonesian, because they exhibit too much "whiteness". same with every other race.
the moment someone is successful under a free society is the moment they start becoming oppressors, or "white adjacent", or what have you. they code it with race because it gets the normies to turn off their brains.
nobody wants to be a racist! everyone remembers how horrible the Nazis were, no one wants to be like them!
The newest hilarious thing about Wikipedia is they're starting to hide/delete (((certain))) early life sections. But since Wikipedia is Wikipedia you can see all the edits in revision history. They're sweeping inconvenient facts under the rug but leaving the broom laying on the floor.
"Great replacement theory" is like 200% real, and their coping, seething, and gaslighting will never change that.
Even blacks are admitting that it's real now that they have to compete with illegals for gibs.
if you notice it and dislike it, it's a bigoted conspiracy theory
if you notice it and like it, it's a good thing and needs to happen and anyone who says otherwise is a bigoted conspiracy theorist
Where else have I seen this dynamic?
And that’s how you know who is perpetrating it.
Odd they missed the chance to put "anti-semitic" in the lead.
I found replacement theory to be mostly real, the mistake everyone is making is that they think it's on racial lines.
they're replacing citizens who have lived in a prosperous society with immigrants who are desperate and will take whatever they can get. citizens who know what prosperity looks like will do everything they can to hold on to it. immigrants coming from worst conditions will blindly follow the party's orders and keep the party in power so long as their new conditions are marginally better than their old conditions.
in the grand scheme of things, they don't care about replacing a race so much as replacing a people.
You must've missed the parts where every regressive entity has been denouncing "whiteness," disparaging traditions of the host countries, or celebrating each time someone says white people are on track to become a minority somewhere.
And you missed the part where blacks still use terms like oreo, coconut and uncle tom unironically whenever they meet another black who leaves the proverbial plantation project and aspires to be more than another hoodlum.
Same thing with asians who are often treated as schrodinger minority or honorary whites depending on the narrative.
It's not ONLY an attack on white people but white western culture as well.
Black people don't seem to mind the successes of their own celebrities, athletes, businessmen, academics, or politicians. Even in subjects seeped in Western cultural norms. It's when they, to your point anyways, pick up viewpoints that might threaten the easy gibs, that the black community seems to lash out.
Meanwhile, some do seem to mind when others encroach upon their turf, so to speak. Consider white rapper Eminem, white basketball players Caitlin Clark and Nikola Jokić, or this story about non-black drum majors in historically black colleges. Why would that be the case if they could potentially increase the exposure and influence of their culture against Western norms?
yes, because the progressive establishment just loves Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, and Kanye West /s
???
that's not what I said.
the individuals I listed are all successful black people who don't tow the progressive party line. hence they are "white adjacent" according to progressives.
Wrong reply chain maybe? I didn't really address white adjacency per se.
and you will also notice that whiteness is a label that is thrown at anyone who follows a successful American lifestyle. it doesn't matter if they are white, black, asian, hispanic, or anything else. if they are free, and are prospering under freedom, they are exhibiting "whiteness".
even though they code it along racial lines, the actual lines are between citizens and new immigrants.
you miss the point. to them, Indonesians who are successful in a free society are no longer Indonesian, because they exhibit too much "whiteness". same with every other race.
However, it is also along racial lines.
it really isn't.
the moment someone is successful under a free society is the moment they start becoming oppressors, or "white adjacent", or what have you. they code it with race because it gets the normies to turn off their brains.
it's Orwellian language games at its finest.
They say white nationalist like its a bad thing. Cant Ireland be for the Irish?
The newest hilarious thing about Wikipedia is they're starting to hide/delete (((certain))) early life sections. But since Wikipedia is Wikipedia you can see all the edits in revision history. They're sweeping inconvenient facts under the rug but leaving the broom laying on the floor.