Elon is not our friend
(twitter.com)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
But remember, TikTok had to be banned because of foreign interference
Elon always has, and always will be a third faction. Elon is a man who has enough money, power and influence to pursue his own goals, outside of existing paradigms.
This of course pisses the globalhomos off, because they're fascists, and nothing can exist outside of their one world state.
In some ways, Elon is a relic from a bygone era, where an individual may or may not be sympathetic to you on different issues and people couldn't be summed up with a simple label.
They're Fabian Socialists specifically. To be honest, that makes them closer to Fascists to actual Old Left Communists who would prefer to seize all property under state power. The Fabians are Syndicalists.
Fascism requires Syndicalist economics. Communism never embraced Syndicalism, and instead was much more top-down in control than the Syndicalists ever were.
Oh that's a relief.
I mean, it doesn't because it means that unlike other Socialists, they make it much harder to root out. Fabians understand subtlety, where most Leftists don't.
To be honest, I think they're still susceptible to a catastrophic collapse all the same; so a complete victory is much more likely than it would be against many other ideological opponents.
fascists are communists with nationalism and ethnocentrism
communists are international, ethnically universal fascists
Lol what? So nazis got rid of property? And the church?
Yup
Really? Take a closer look at the doctrines of each and tell me which is a better fit. Admittedly, the current totalitarian ideology has elements of both, but you may be surprised what you find.
Such as? What elements of national socialism are anything close to the jewish chokehold that society is under now.
Well, technically, Zionism is a form of National Socialism.
The Zionists sought to use political-racial solidarity to create a Volksgerhmindschaft out of the Jewish diaspora, and found a state based on a relationship between Jewish "soil" and the lineage of Jewish "blood" governed under a Socialist secular state.
This is why there are tensions between religious jews and the Zionists.
To be honest, the old NatSocs were fucking loonies that believed in nonsense that is similar to Yakub bullshit, and were violent revolutionary socialists that killed more people (even their own) more than even the worst Zionists ever have.
National Socialists are Race Communists.
You're jewish therefore your opinions on national socialists and fascists are disregarded
Not jewish. However, I find it curious how you would reject the opinions of jewish fascists, and jewish national socialists.
Alright, I suppose I have to spell it out... Take for instance the way corporations are not owned by the state, and yet they must uphold the state propaganda. Witness the State as God. This is fascism 101. All "Communist" governments eventually become fascist if they wish to endure.
There's a reason for that. Fascism works.
It's awful, but it is possible to have a functioning fascist state. With communism you run out of food and money too quickly.
There's a reason "Communism with Chinese characteristics" is essentially orthodox with fascist doctrine but with some commie window dressing.
Fascism was an ideology invented by Aryans while communism was invented by jews. And i don't need to say who has more power at the moment do i?
......... Fascism was invented by Italians, not Aryans. Communism was invented by the French and the English. National Socialism was invented by the Germans.
Aryans (by NatSoc standards of the time) had been dead for millennia before Fascism could exist.
You're jewish therefore your opinions on national socialists and fascists are disregarded
"Everyone I don't like is a jew"
Lombard Italians are German.
Learn to read, retard. I'm talking about the doctrine, not retarded surface level racial takes.
You are the one who is looking at this at a surface level by not considering the racial aspects of ideologies.
At best he's still begrudgingly working within their system of control, while capable enough to figure out how to move through that system doing whatever minimally required compliance it demands. Not outside the paradigm, but exerting enough influence to warp the paradigm where needed.
Monetization is kind of inherently anti-speech if you ask me. Because, if you allow it, people will just endlessly meme popular ideas for money, and that content will snowball with higher production values. It's not the mechanism you use for a forum if you want to find things out. It's more for making money. So you have to consider "what is Twitter?"
Guess people will just do it like on youtube then and have their own ads in their content.
Don't worry, 99% of the submitted IDs are from bots using stolen info.