What we need to do is cut many of the arts programs out of university entirely and switch over to a Conservatory model like they have in France. If you're not familiar with how conservatory works, it's a bit like how Minor League Baseball works in the US, except for arts.
Instead of taking all comers, it's a hyper competitive, "up or out" model where the truly skilled earn a pathway into the spotlight, and the posers who don't have the commitment or the talent are wrung out.
Because the few percent who genuinely do have the intellect and ability to pursue meaningful careers have the constitution on their side to say they have a right to do so.
So long as the current constitution stands, any attempt to exclude is doomed to fail, so it's more productive to focus on cutting off the supply side. Shutting down the wasteful degree programs and switching over to a Conservatory model that will achieve the same end result without the fight over first principles and rights.
Speaking as someone who things modern higher education is nothing more than a babysitting facility for indoctrinating the next commie voters, I'd say it'd be a quicker solution to just cut all government funding for them all.
Higher education has gotten too big and should be a place to heighten the skills of those focused in particular fields like medicine, science and I would even add philosophy. Remove the funding from governments and you'll see a sharp decline in women and EVERY diverse group not Asian attending.
Women should have an education. It shouldn't be the same as men though. Men and women are different and have different needs and goals.
But as he was saying currently, male or female, ALL "higher education" is poisoned and at best a waste of time and money to get a certification that you don't need, or worse mental poison oriented towards making people destroy the society they are in.
"Getting rid of women" will not improve anything until you deal with the root causes, which are most certainly bigger than some deluded women.
Once again, I will say that the reason things have declined is not simply because women are being taught math. There are much deeper root causes, and blaming women for everything will not help fix those.
Girls are human, humans are people, people have an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The answer is yes and yes.
SHOULD girls go to college? outside of a few career paths, my answer would be the same as my answer for everyone else: no. College has become the new High School, since half of the world isn't learning anything in high school right now. it's also expensive, and will most likely not give you any return on investment.
Yes, women should be able to if they really want to, imo.
The issue right now with post-secondary is the government funding. Take away ALL government funding to post-secondary, including (and most especially), student loans backed by the federal government. Lower taxes with the money saved.
Voila, you will have solved most of the problem with women and post-secondary overnight.
Dude, women love going to college because they get to gain access to fuck so many more hot alpha men than in their small towns and it's all under the guise of an "education" so they have plausible deniability. Not to mention, they do get the ability to gain a degree to work so they can earn lots of money for traveling so they can fuck alpha Chads in other countries without having to admit that's what they're doing (plausible deniability again) or worry about anyone in their community catching them. Not to mention, with her own income she won't need to marry a man ever or rely on his finances so she never had to sexually please a man she doesn't really feel like it or have the responsibility of actually being a good girlfriend/wife because she's "strong and independent".
Biologically, women might be designed to want kids but they sure aren't designed to give men what they want. Also, you'll need to ban hormone contraception if you want pure nature to take over women's drive. The pill fucks things up.
A dishonest answer. By interrogating college officials, I have learned that there are many kinds of colleges, with different courses and ideals. In America, most of the educational system is captured to create the illusion of demand for useless degrees, and have become places where the hatred of their own is taught.
In proper colleges, students are taught what they signed up to learn, without any filler courses, and the students are not over-charged for their effort at self-betterment. So, if they want to learn more, then they should be able to. Moreso if they can fund their studies themselves.
Of course, given your answers, I know that you subhumans have never experienced a proper college, and out of petty jealousy, want to eradicate all knowledge of it from the human psyche. You will not succeed.
I see your knowledge of college comes from watching pornography. I recommend several white phosphorus shells jammed into your eyeballs and detonated to fix that.
By the way, mudslime, the streets are not the problem. Your kind are. You lot are far too desperate to breed, as per the instructions planted into your minds by your masters.
That's the entirety of your false argument based on your addiction to pornography and trying to justify rape. No wonder women avoid deceitful, whiny subhuman filth like you. I'm happy that you lesser creatures don't actually know what a proper college is, given your ranting about these alleged 'sororities' and 'fraternities', loser.
PS: Thanks for the promotion to white man level 4!
This is the wrong framing.
What we need to do is cut many of the arts programs out of university entirely and switch over to a Conservatory model like they have in France. If you're not familiar with how conservatory works, it's a bit like how Minor League Baseball works in the US, except for arts.
Instead of taking all comers, it's a hyper competitive, "up or out" model where the truly skilled earn a pathway into the spotlight, and the posers who don't have the commitment or the talent are wrung out.
Because the few percent who genuinely do have the intellect and ability to pursue meaningful careers have the constitution on their side to say they have a right to do so.
So long as the current constitution stands, any attempt to exclude is doomed to fail, so it's more productive to focus on cutting off the supply side. Shutting down the wasteful degree programs and switching over to a Conservatory model that will achieve the same end result without the fight over first principles and rights.
You're missing the point entirely.
You're arguing like an emo teenager about how things ought be, ignoring the obvious, gigantic impediments to bringing about your ideal.
I'm giving you a more realistic strategy that is theoretically actionable under the current legal environment.
TBH, your arguments are so cartoonishly outlandish I'm starting to suspect you're a false flag poster.
Speaking as someone who things modern higher education is nothing more than a babysitting facility for indoctrinating the next commie voters, I'd say it'd be a quicker solution to just cut all government funding for them all.
Higher education has gotten too big and should be a place to heighten the skills of those focused in particular fields like medicine, science and I would even add philosophy. Remove the funding from governments and you'll see a sharp decline in women and EVERY diverse group not Asian attending.
Women should have an education. It shouldn't be the same as men though. Men and women are different and have different needs and goals.
But as he was saying currently, male or female, ALL "higher education" is poisoned and at best a waste of time and money to get a certification that you don't need, or worse mental poison oriented towards making people destroy the society they are in.
"Getting rid of women" will not improve anything until you deal with the root causes, which are most certainly bigger than some deluded women.
Once again, I will say that the reason things have declined is not simply because women are being taught math. There are much deeper root causes, and blaming women for everything will not help fix those.
It smells like curry and children's tears in this thread.
Handshake bait.
Kill yourself, outsider.
OP is a fedposting faggot. I'll bite anyway.
Girls are human, humans are people, people have an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The answer is yes and yes.
SHOULD girls go to college? outside of a few career paths, my answer would be the same as my answer for everyone else: no. College has become the new High School, since half of the world isn't learning anything in high school right now. it's also expensive, and will most likely not give you any return on investment.
I am not a collectivist. Having broad mandates that dictate what individuals can do with their lives is antithetical to a free society.
Yes, women should be able to if they really want to, imo.
The issue right now with post-secondary is the government funding. Take away ALL government funding to post-secondary, including (and most especially), student loans backed by the federal government. Lower taxes with the money saved.
Voila, you will have solved most of the problem with women and post-secondary overnight.
Dude, women love going to college because they get to gain access to fuck so many more hot alpha men than in their small towns and it's all under the guise of an "education" so they have plausible deniability. Not to mention, they do get the ability to gain a degree to work so they can earn lots of money for traveling so they can fuck alpha Chads in other countries without having to admit that's what they're doing (plausible deniability again) or worry about anyone in their community catching them. Not to mention, with her own income she won't need to marry a man ever or rely on his finances so she never had to sexually please a man she doesn't really feel like it or have the responsibility of actually being a good girlfriend/wife because she's "strong and independent".
Biologically, women might be designed to want kids but they sure aren't designed to give men what they want. Also, you'll need to ban hormone contraception if you want pure nature to take over women's drive. The pill fucks things up.
Depends. What kind of college? What is the curriculum and courses within?
A dishonest answer. By interrogating college officials, I have learned that there are many kinds of colleges, with different courses and ideals. In America, most of the educational system is captured to create the illusion of demand for useless degrees, and have become places where the hatred of their own is taught.
In proper colleges, students are taught what they signed up to learn, without any filler courses, and the students are not over-charged for their effort at self-betterment. So, if they want to learn more, then they should be able to. Moreso if they can fund their studies themselves.
Of course, given your answers, I know that you subhumans have never experienced a proper college, and out of petty jealousy, want to eradicate all knowledge of it from the human psyche. You will not succeed.
I see your knowledge of college comes from watching pornography. I recommend several white phosphorus shells jammed into your eyeballs and detonated to fix that.
By the way, mudslime, the streets are not the problem. Your kind are. You lot are far too desperate to breed, as per the instructions planted into your minds by your masters.
"Ifs" and allegedly 'dominated by whites'.
That's the entirety of your false argument based on your addiction to pornography and trying to justify rape. No wonder women avoid deceitful, whiny subhuman filth like you. I'm happy that you lesser creatures don't actually know what a proper college is, given your ranting about these alleged 'sororities' and 'fraternities', loser.
PS: Thanks for the promotion to white man level 4!
Handshakes can make post again? Freaking sweet
I miss imp. his brand of fed posting at least had character.