The entire reason any of these guys ever gain prominence is because what they are saying resonates with men. Sometimes in ways those men don't even understand, but their subconscious understands that its speaking a truth they had been denying for a long time. Most of them aren't profound, and looking at that list most are pretty fucking milquetoast and weak at that, but they say very fundamental stuff that just jostles men towards them.
That's what makes these attempts to "discredit" or "cancel" them are so pathetic. You might kill the personality in charge, but those men are still downtrodden and searching for someone to lead them. And all the "accepted" methods have already failed to begin with for them.
So nothing of this sort will ever accomplish a thing other than waste a lot of time and money.
Feminists won't be a threat to the Manosphere unless they address actual men's issues instead of making up bullshit issues like "toxic masculinity" to try to divert attention to topics they deem nonthreatening. They'll never do that because they only bother with the latter to try to sabotage and coopt groups that talk about the real issues. Ever browse soy drenched shitholes like r/menslib and r/bropill? No self respecting man gets involved with those fags.
It's honestly astonishing as a man, to see women able to switch emotions like a computer program. They can go from smiling to sobbing to screaming in under 10 seconds without some kind of outside stimuli.
They're like psychotic robots that simultaneously feel and don't feel the emotions they display. It's really unfortunate for society as a whole that men aren't able to see through their act most of the time.
I mean if you believe in the Bible or are just a science guy, it's in a females nature to be able to manipulate the male. I read on this ages ago so I have to preface it with "just trust me bro" because I couldn't begin to tell you where to look and I'm too lazy rn. Reader beware I guess.
From a scientific pov, female humans developed manipulative tactics as a survival mechanism because they don't have the physical strength to care for themselves like males do. They also require protection when pregnant.
Supposedly the cries of a female elicit the same reaction in males, as the cries of children do. They adapted into mimicry to get what they want.
Females, also as a survival mechanism, adapted the behavior of trying to force themselves into the male sphere as much as possible to keep the male aware of them, because obviously outside of sexual reproduction, males don't need females to exist.
Psychologists just in the past year said (paraphrasing) “oopsies, as it turns out the female psychopath is 500% higher than previously thought and the rate between men and women is 1.2:1 not 5:1 as previously thought.” Funnily enough it’s because male and female psychopaths don’t manipulate in the same way! Who would have guessed that one right?
Rollo covered this as well. I can’t remember where, but he was talking about how women use “conversation ending” language when they can’t or won’t win a discussion, so they use words like “who hurt you?” To throw a wrench in the conversation. “Toxic masculinity” is the societal level of women saying “who hurt you”.
Europe spent 2 billion dollars just to besmirch Andrew Tate in their textbooks. It is no surprise to me that we are seeing yet another example on the war on men
I've never even heard of any of the bluepilled "positive" influencers, so good job DHS. Disgusting. There's probably ten more similar programs we don't know about.
setup bluepilled controlled opposition that skinsuit redpillers then ban everyone that is talking about real issues outside of the feminist-set boundaries. they do this every time with every thing. it's their MO. they do it with politics, they do it with every social issue.
women shouldn't vote. if you aren't talking about that you aren't redpilled.
I'm not going to engage with material from an account using a picture of a scantily clad woman on it, and I encourage all men to do the same. Regardless of the message, someone using a photo like that is using female sexuality to sell their ideas to men, which means they are trying to manipulate you. Men are not going to find any solutions if they keep letting their dicks do the talking.
The entire reason any of these guys ever gain prominence is because what they are saying resonates with men. Sometimes in ways those men don't even understand, but their subconscious understands that its speaking a truth they had been denying for a long time. Most of them aren't profound, and looking at that list most are pretty fucking milquetoast and weak at that, but they say very fundamental stuff that just jostles men towards them.
That's what makes these attempts to "discredit" or "cancel" them are so pathetic. You might kill the personality in charge, but those men are still downtrodden and searching for someone to lead them. And all the "accepted" methods have already failed to begin with for them.
So nothing of this sort will ever accomplish a thing other than waste a lot of time and money.
I wonder if this is why dailywire has been picking a fight with them for ages
Another day another showcasing of why “anti-discrimination” laws don’t work.
Feminists won't be a threat to the Manosphere unless they address actual men's issues instead of making up bullshit issues like "toxic masculinity" to try to divert attention to topics they deem nonthreatening. They'll never do that because they only bother with the latter to try to sabotage and coopt groups that talk about the real issues. Ever browse soy drenched shitholes like r/menslib and r/bropill? No self respecting man gets involved with those fags.
Trust not a woman when she weeps, for it is her nature to weep when she wants her will.
2400 years later and nothings changed.
It's honestly astonishing as a man, to see women able to switch emotions like a computer program. They can go from smiling to sobbing to screaming in under 10 seconds without some kind of outside stimuli.
They're like psychotic robots that simultaneously feel and don't feel the emotions they display. It's really unfortunate for society as a whole that men aren't able to see through their act most of the time.
I mean if you believe in the Bible or are just a science guy, it's in a females nature to be able to manipulate the male. I read on this ages ago so I have to preface it with "just trust me bro" because I couldn't begin to tell you where to look and I'm too lazy rn. Reader beware I guess.
From a scientific pov, female humans developed manipulative tactics as a survival mechanism because they don't have the physical strength to care for themselves like males do. They also require protection when pregnant.
Supposedly the cries of a female elicit the same reaction in males, as the cries of children do. They adapted into mimicry to get what they want.
Females, also as a survival mechanism, adapted the behavior of trying to force themselves into the male sphere as much as possible to keep the male aware of them, because obviously outside of sexual reproduction, males don't need females to exist.
Psychologists just in the past year said (paraphrasing) “oopsies, as it turns out the female psychopath is 500% higher than previously thought and the rate between men and women is 1.2:1 not 5:1 as previously thought.” Funnily enough it’s because male and female psychopaths don’t manipulate in the same way! Who would have guessed that one right?
Rollo covered this as well. I can’t remember where, but he was talking about how women use “conversation ending” language when they can’t or won’t win a discussion, so they use words like “who hurt you?” To throw a wrench in the conversation. “Toxic masculinity” is the societal level of women saying “who hurt you”.
Europe spent 2 billion dollars just to besmirch Andrew Tate in their textbooks. It is no surprise to me that we are seeing yet another example on the war on men
The catholic church spent billions besmirching atheism in their textbooks.
As they should have.
I've never even heard of any of the bluepilled "positive" influencers, so good job DHS. Disgusting. There's probably ten more similar programs we don't know about.
It's the new D.A.R.E. lol.
How soon before mother-in-law jokes become hate speech?
The authorities do seem very keen to clamp down on the concept of male self-determination aren't they?
For the same reason they destroyed all male spaces, they can control women but they can only destroy men.
Youtube seemed to be promoting the heck out of them for a while until I started hitting "don't recommend channel".
I don't dispute the message. It's that all of them are using cartoon furry avatars to narrate their screed in lispy voices.
Creeps me out.
setup bluepilled controlled opposition that skinsuit redpillers then ban everyone that is talking about real issues outside of the feminist-set boundaries. they do this every time with every thing. it's their MO. they do it with politics, they do it with every social issue.
women shouldn't vote. if you aren't talking about that you aren't redpilled.
I'm not going to engage with material from an account using a picture of a scantily clad woman on it, and I encourage all men to do the same. Regardless of the message, someone using a photo like that is using female sexuality to sell their ideas to men, which means they are trying to manipulate you. Men are not going to find any solutions if they keep letting their dicks do the talking.