Good. Jury duty is the one place that your vote actually counts. People need to take advantage of it like at least one patriot did here. "Conservatives" who get themselves out of jury duty intentionally are traitors.
Not to mention you know our enemies are doing the same. My mom was on a jury trying some sheboon for shit like robbery and burglary. She was guilty as sin of course, but the one nigger bitch that the defense managed to install wasn't going to convict no matter what the evidence. Every one else on the jury pandered to her, saying they respect her opinion and shit like that, but it was deadlocked and they had to declare a mistrial. But thanks to my mom and some of the other jurors they avoided another OJ situation and were able to retry her.
Prosecutor Mike Jette urged the jury to find Kelly guilty of reckless manslaughter or negligent homicide if they forgo finding the defendant guilty of second-degree murder.
Well now, in civilized nations we call this 'jury tampering'.
Jury tampering is so little enforced that Lawyers regularly and openly discuss doing it on cases as a matter of course.
Plenty of huge cases they deliberately pick jurors based on things like their death penalty stance or their race because they know it'll influence the entire case for them.
I mean we should charge him with murder and manslaughter since he makes himself responsible for the murders they commit when he protects them. I'm also well aware that there isn't snowball's chance in Hell that he'll be charged for anything.
Maybe I misunderstand. Was this outside of the context of court? Because if he was speaking in court, in his capacity as a prosecutor, and convicting of a lesser charge was something the jury was permitted to do, how is that "tampering?" Isn't that like saying that a defense attorney saying, "and that's why you should find the defendant not guilty" in closing remarks is "tampering?"
Over here, defense attorneys aren't allowed to do that either. Best they can say is "I believe, given the findings of this trial, that my client is innocent." if the court case goes in the defendant's favor.
If an American went down to Mexico illegally, trespassed on someone's property, and met with a monumentally worse fate as a result, everyone would be ridiculing them.
For that matter any time a white person does some dumb shit in a black neighborhood and meets with a gruesome fate, they're ridiculed for that too.
But trespassing on someone's property in a part of the country where cartels are conducting business and winning stupid prizes as a result makes you a martyr to proglodytes. Nevermind that shooting people you think are cartel members takes some grande cajones. More people having the courage to take aim at cartel members on sight would disincentivize cartel activity in the area, but then you have bottomfeeding scumsucking demon worm Soros DA's who do their damndest to make life safe for criminals and dangerous for civilians.
Good. Jury duty is the one place that your vote actually counts. People need to take advantage of it like at least one patriot did here. "Conservatives" who get themselves out of jury duty intentionally are traitors.
Not to mention you know our enemies are doing the same. My mom was on a jury trying some sheboon for shit like robbery and burglary. She was guilty as sin of course, but the one nigger bitch that the defense managed to install wasn't going to convict no matter what the evidence. Every one else on the jury pandered to her, saying they respect her opinion and shit like that, but it was deadlocked and they had to declare a mistrial. But thanks to my mom and some of the other jurors they avoided another OJ situation and were able to retry her.
[cries in European]
Not just that, with how juries are structured, well to do white men are always picked as the foreperson because responsibility.
And, unfortunately, most lawyers know this too, which is why the jury selection process almost never allows White men onto the jury.
Remember that foreman in the Georgia Trump showtrial?
You mean the perfect example of why young women should be avoided like the plague in any business setting?
Well now, in civilized nations we call this 'jury tampering'.
In a civilized nation this guy would get a medal for protecting the border.
Can't we charge this retard prosecutor for that? It's surely justified based on the murders the animals he's fighting for commit.
Jury tampering is so little enforced that Lawyers regularly and openly discuss doing it on cases as a matter of course.
Plenty of huge cases they deliberately pick jurors based on things like their death penalty stance or their race because they know it'll influence the entire case for them.
I mean we should charge him with murder and manslaughter since he makes himself responsible for the murders they commit when he protects them. I'm also well aware that there isn't snowball's chance in Hell that he'll be charged for anything.
Maybe I misunderstand. Was this outside of the context of court? Because if he was speaking in court, in his capacity as a prosecutor, and convicting of a lesser charge was something the jury was permitted to do, how is that "tampering?" Isn't that like saying that a defense attorney saying, "and that's why you should find the defendant not guilty" in closing remarks is "tampering?"
Over here, defense attorneys aren't allowed to do that either. Best they can say is "I believe, given the findings of this trial, that my client is innocent." if the court case goes in the defendant's favor.
If an American went down to Mexico illegally, trespassed on someone's property, and met with a monumentally worse fate as a result, everyone would be ridiculing them.
For that matter any time a white person does some dumb shit in a black neighborhood and meets with a gruesome fate, they're ridiculed for that too.
But trespassing on someone's property in a part of the country where cartels are conducting business and winning stupid prizes as a result makes you a martyr to proglodytes. Nevermind that shooting people you think are cartel members takes some grande cajones. More people having the courage to take aim at cartel members on sight would disincentivize cartel activity in the area, but then you have bottomfeeding scumsucking demon worm Soros DA's who do their damndest to make life safe for criminals and dangerous for civilians.
Illegals don't have rights, it's no different than him shooting a coyote or similar predator on his own property in order to protect his livestock.
never should have gone to trial. he should have been given a handshake and extra ammo for his trouble.
Hopefully this means conservatives are learning. A good sign.
not knowing anything about the case, I'd wager the taco nigger was being aggressive and attacked the rancher with a weapon