Who would have guessed that building an entire industry around female resentment and telling young girls that boys have it easier than them and they deserve special treatment would lead to girls believing that boys have it easier than them and demanding special treatment?
It is not that boys receive more recognition is that girls "believe" boys receive more recognition.
Excellent point. Schools are run from top to bottom to cater to girls. How they learn and study best. K through University are antagonistic to boys. Now we got problems because an art teacher dared to praise a boy's drawing.
Stop making the rules based on the most insecure creature's feelings. This goes for all of society. Making rules and laws for the exception is so fucking feminine. Make the rule. If there's an exception, that's what judges are for. This morass of bullshit is drowning everyone.
Well you should take it seriously. It was one of the first "sensitivity reader" groups that is responsible for the current state of Hollywood and the gaming industry.
Link for the study: https://archive.is/PdKm2
It is not that boys receive more recognition is that girls "believe" boys receive more recognition.
Parents "agree" is the same as parents "believe", no factual data here.
This is a study about feelings not facts.
At the bottom you can find the resources that includes:
Inclusive Language Training for LEGO Employees
and
About the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media (GDIGM)
Girls get propped up because of their genitalia all the time. The only way boys get recognized is what they accomplish.
Who would have guessed that building an entire industry around female resentment and telling young girls that boys have it easier than them and they deserve special treatment would lead to girls believing that boys have it easier than them and demanding special treatment?
Sort of like the 1 in 4 women is a rape victim, taken at a women's shelter....
Didn't that figure come from a university campus questionnaire which bundled lesser actions into "sexual assault" in addition to the response bias.
That was the 1 in 6 and the 1 in 30 test. Both were way too much, but the testers got even more brazen.
Want to go out sometime?
No thanks.
You sure?
I'm sure.
Because you asked after she said no, she's now counted in the 1in4.
''Attempted forced kissing''.
A guy went for the kiss, she pushed him away. ''Rape survivor.''
That's the one! I forgot the exact stupidity but that's it.
Excellent point. Schools are run from top to bottom to cater to girls. How they learn and study best. K through University are antagonistic to boys. Now we got problems because an art teacher dared to praise a boy's drawing.
Stop making the rules based on the most insecure creature's feelings. This goes for all of society. Making rules and laws for the exception is so fucking feminine. Make the rule. If there's an exception, that's what judges are for. This morass of bullshit is drowning everyone.
And the best part is if any boy or man protests the blatant catering? Male fragility.
Nothing but projection as always.
Sorry but I can't get past the fact that the "GDIGM" is a thing that exists, let alone take it seriously, lol...
I knew she was "washed up", but that seems... An extreme path to take, to start your own (presumably) "institute" of that type/remit...
Well you should take it seriously. It was one of the first "sensitivity reader" groups that is responsible for the current state of Hollywood and the gaming industry.