Why would they need her to testify at all? Surely they could have easily put together a case with the financial records from the, y'know, missing billions of dollars. Not only that, she seemed to be the one who was more responsible for the financial malfeasance.
Don't know about 'Jewish' scapegoat as didn't the woman involved get off scott free?
Judging from her looks she's been getting punished for a long time
Exactly. Isn't she just as guilty as he is? They seemed to be nearly equal partners in this debacle.
She agreed to testify against SBF in exchange for a no prison plea deal. She had to pay a fine and if I remember correctly plead guilty to a felony.
Why would they need her to testify at all? Surely they could have easily put together a case with the financial records from the, y'know, missing billions of dollars. Not only that, she seemed to be the one who was more responsible for the financial malfeasance.
They don't need her but it helps and makes their case simpler. It's just how the feds work.