Aside from Imp I'm probably the least tolerant user on here when it comes to women. From the little I've seen, Melanie is pretty good at staying the course and being consistent with her talking points. It doesn't necessarily make her trustworthy, but she has so far steered clear of Brittany Venti levels of church-lady tradcuckery.
How would you characterize "literally all pornography is human trafficking?" Because that's the kind of shrieking moral-panic Wednesday-night Bible group insanity that my grandmother used to lap up like clotted cream.
It's rooted in the typical female desire to control other people's sexuality. Not just male sexuality, but also that of other women. Those motivations are the same whether the woman spouting this nonsense is a tradcon or a feminist: In this context they're two sides of the same coin. And Venti is a worse hypocrite than most of them because she's built her brand using her sex appeal to attract subscribers.
That would certainly explain their frantic claims about The Patriarchy, men keeping women under control ala the Handmaid's Tale, and "reproductive rights". Pure projection from people who'd do the same if they could.
That's standard women rhetoric these days. "Trafficking" is their current boogeyman that has every woman under 30 terrified. And they are all neurotic enough to see porn as competition, which means under standard woman logic it can be accused of the worst thing ever to get rid of it.
For someone trying to claim the title of High Misogynist you really listen to their words as if they mean anything or has any principle beyond fear or jealousy.
I haven't followed her, but I think she's been conservative and relatively wholesome for a while. Certainly doesn't mean she's not a grifter (in fact she totally is; all content creators are to some extent), but she's alright, as far as I can tell. Hangs with a decent crowd, says good things. Again, not familiar with her, never watched any of content, but have seen a bit of her from other people she hangs around with.
That said, yes, your advice is still spot on. Be wary. Don't simp. For anyone, seriously, don't simp.
This is the reason I didn't subscribe to her content for the most part.
But, props to her for calling out faggotry for being degenerate. A lot of content creators are afraid to call it what it is. And props to her for also posting and discussing Bible scriptures every single day.
She got banned for saying "gay" "lesbian" etc are fake things that are invented by mentally ill people to try to normalize their deviant behavior -- IOW she got banned for saying the truth.
Whoa. Props on a three minute video; this is a low bar, but still a massive mark of respect for a content creator nowadays.
Aside from Imp I'm probably the least tolerant user on here when it comes to women. From the little I've seen, Melanie is pretty good at staying the course and being consistent with her talking points. It doesn't necessarily make her trustworthy, but she has so far steered clear of Brittany Venti levels of church-lady tradcuckery.
Brittany Venti a church lady? LOL
How would you characterize "literally all pornography is human trafficking?" Because that's the kind of shrieking moral-panic Wednesday-night Bible group insanity that my grandmother used to lap up like clotted cream.
I'd categorize that as stupidity.
It's rooted in the typical female desire to control other people's sexuality. Not just male sexuality, but also that of other women. Those motivations are the same whether the woman spouting this nonsense is a tradcon or a feminist: In this context they're two sides of the same coin. And Venti is a worse hypocrite than most of them because she's built her brand using her sex appeal to attract subscribers.
That would certainly explain their frantic claims about The Patriarchy, men keeping women under control ala the Handmaid's Tale, and "reproductive rights". Pure projection from people who'd do the same if they could.
That's standard women rhetoric these days. "Trafficking" is their current boogeyman that has every woman under 30 terrified. And they are all neurotic enough to see porn as competition, which means under standard woman logic it can be accused of the worst thing ever to get rid of it.
For someone trying to claim the title of High Misogynist you really listen to their words as if they mean anything or has any principle beyond fear or jealousy.
Exactly.
I haven't followed her, but I think she's been conservative and relatively wholesome for a while. Certainly doesn't mean she's not a grifter (in fact she totally is; all content creators are to some extent), but she's alright, as far as I can tell. Hangs with a decent crowd, says good things. Again, not familiar with her, never watched any of content, but have seen a bit of her from other people she hangs around with.
That said, yes, your advice is still spot on. Be wary. Don't simp. For anyone, seriously, don't simp.
Regardless of her content no one with that much tattooing is "wholesome."
This is the reason I didn't subscribe to her content for the most part.
But, props to her for calling out faggotry for being degenerate. A lot of content creators are afraid to call it what it is. And props to her for also posting and discussing Bible scriptures every single day.
She named the abomination, that's what upset them.
She got banned for saying "gay" "lesbian" etc are fake things that are invented by mentally ill people to try to normalize their deviant behavior -- IOW she got banned for saying the truth.
what the hell? a based woman?
Tattos, semi-nudity and aposematism hair dye aren't based, the rest is.
They do occur quite frequently, it's just we don't notice them as they aren't on social media and are busy actually raising their kids..
The fact that your brain even allows the idea that a woman could be "based" means you are not only a simp, but will never be "based" yourself.