That "New Audience" should show up to buy tickets aaaany... mmmmoment.... now...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
None of these female superhero movies work because women do not fit the hero’s journey. A man needs to struggle against the world to create value and establish his worth. A woman, by contrast, is born with value. So when a woman pretends to struggle like a man, it rings hollow to the audience. Because that’s not how the real world works.
Female superhero movies could actually work and they're not inherently contradictory with the hero's journey, but feminism is simply incompatible with quality, artistic integrity and fidelity.
They are contradictory for the fact that a man has to build his worth to overcome adversity to eventually establish and generate a worthwhile legacy and lineage.
This is not something a woman has to do ever, she simply has to find a man she genetically feels predisposed to create a lineage/legacy with.
So a female superhero is literally antithetical to the hero's journey because of what current_horror said: a woman's greatest trait and virtue is something she's born with, hence her inherent value is what she has to GIVE not what she has to achieve.
A man has to ACHIEVE his value to receive the gift of purity from a woman to create an offspring based on his stature as a hero (his achievements change him, and thus make him worthy of having a strong seed). That's the whole point of the hero's journey: that a man EARNS his right to a legacy.
Women don't have to earn anything, and there is no reason for them to because biologically it serves no purpose. A female superhero can work, but not in the same way as a male superhero, which is precisely why most female superhero films simply do not work.
The only one most people consider to be relatively "good" was the first Wonder Woman, but keep in mind that she didn't have to earn her worth; once again, she was born with it. So no hero's journey there. The same thing with Red Sonja -- who had her value forcibly taken from her and so her journey was one of revenge rather than one of attaining value.
The end goals are always going to be different between men and women due to base differences in biological essentialism. This is precisely why the hero's journey for men is so much more compelling than one fabricated out of absurdities for women. Because in the latter case, we all know for a fact how basic biology works and how the dating market works, and how Western societies favour, pamper, or coddle women. So trying to depict a woman struggling like a man is both unrealistic and subconciously jarring because we all know it's not true.
For women, their stories are always more compelling when it's centered around traits that identify with their real life struggles from a feminine perspective, typically dealing with familial issues, finding the right romantic partner, or seeking restitution/recourse/retribution for a grave injustice (the last of which actually applies equally to both sexes for obvious reasons).
If you look at most good films that star women, it's usually about some form of recourse for what value they've lost, rather than what value they can gain. As opposed to most good films starring men, where -- as current_horror points out -- the hero's journey is always the more compelling narrative for him.
It would help if you'd bring this in the context of a village or something.
Anyway, you make a plausible (romantic) argument but the 'work with what you got in order to fend off an aggressive enemy' seems not to be listed as one of the story arcs for women.
Ah, that fits under the seeking recourse for a grave injustice, since obviously fending off a village or avenging the village for the grave injustice of being dominated/overrun by a greater enemy still fits within that trope. Sort of like Disney's Dragon Slayer, where Caitlin Clarke's character journeys to seek help from a wizard to slay the dragon as a form of saving the people from the dragon's wrath (which also ties into the classic Hero's Journey for Peter MacNicol's character), which kind of fits with your request to put this into the context of a village.
Side note: Dragon Slayer has one of the most insane plots of any movie I’ve ever seen.
Recap for anyone who hasn’t seen it:
An elderly wizard is too frail to make the journey to fight the dragon who is gobbling up virgin sacrifices, so he goads a king’s guard into fatally stabbing him. His body is then cremated and turned into a pouch that is given over to his apprentice (who is not privy to the plan, btw). He transports it to the dragon’s lair (as part of a “last wish”) where the wizard is then magically resurrected only to be immediately used as a literal suicide bomber. The dragon snatches him up, the apprentice detonates his mentor, and the dragon dies in the explosion.It’s fucking bananas.
Or it's its own trope.
Fending off a possible rape.
Idk man the first Wonder Woman movie with Gadot was pretty good. 2nd was some weird feminist rape fantasy.
The first Wonder Woman movie was average at best. It received a lot of effusive praise because the bar for female-led geek genre films - and DC films in general - is absurdly low. It’s worse than probably half the Marvel films.
Up until the last 30 minutes...
Ive never seen a movie self destruct so hard so intensely so late in the runtime lol
I've said this before, you can sell female-led superhero movies as long as you understand your audience is still men.
It's funny how manga and anime consistently embarrass Western media.
They've been doing stronk/powerful female MC for ages and it almost always is done excellently.
Frieren, Princess Mononoke, basically the entire female deuteragonist cast of Mushoku Tensei, Samus Aran, Tifa, bro I could go on and on.
So many Japanese female characters are powerful and helpful and strong in ways that fit them. Some are literally strong as hell, but not to the detriment of males. Usually played as the muscle mommy character that is still somewhat feminine and attractive.
Japan media has much more respect for women and their beauty and nature than western bastards who want to use females as a bludgeoning device.
Completely forgot about the Harlequin movie. It helps that I never saw it.
They all have I've-never-seen-them in common.
The writers are all lefties?
I'm not a lesbian. I like watching well-built men do stuff.
Would be nice to see what women prefer, the classic She-Hulk comics or the new TV show?
My Hulk is Lou Ferrigno, and the two or three comics I had in the 1970s.
At this point it's clear the regressive left is merely trying to succeed via cultural congestion and propaganda efforts.
That, and giving multi-million dollar jobs to card-carrying party members. The director is an Ally™, so producers hand her a check and give zero fucks wether it gets burned ot not.
See: Twitter 1.0.
80% of jobs at Twitter served no function other than to reward allies.
"You vote like I do and protest what I protest? Here, have a three figure salary and a cushy do-nothing job; you earned it."
https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/l7lxcldode7.mp4
https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/wye3c6d5d64.mp4
batman and robin is worse than birds of prey tough.
You mean the Batman movie that was directed by the flaming gay old man who didn’t like comic books?
schumacher directed two movies, he also made batman forever, that was actually entertaining.
What about quantumania? Multiverse of madness?
I'm a little tired so I won't delve deep, but your analysis seems accurate, even if there's way more problems I think. Also, wanda was an unhinged psychopath in wandavision as well, even if the show doesn't acknowledge it
Those had feminist problems as well but it was not all female. Considering leftist rules at making movies, an all female cast should perform better just because they don't have a man around to emasculate.
Leagues above these three.
Sailor Moon or any kinda magical girl show could teach them a lot. It doesn't even need to be overly feminine, just not manly like how they make these types of movies alongside making them "better" than men.