Random Twitter bitch I've never heard of said what? Aforementioned random bitch is calling for unity? Oh, must be a massive conspiracy to kill all men. Man, I really hate women now.
Although, for the record, I also think it's a bit extreme to write of entire portions of the population like that, no matter who they are. Take notice of, be wary of, tread carefully around, sure. But hate and write off completely? No.
Extreme? Yes. Unjustified? No. Their inherent nature combined with a legal system and rotten culture that enables their predatory behavior makes them a clear a present danger to my wellbeing, and the wellbeing of all men.
"Better Together" - The idea that we are lacking something without them.
I mean, literally true. Biological reality. Guess I'm a simpcuck.
"The Trans Menace, Sponsored by Team DeSimp (est 2022)" - The idea that we should protect them from an issue that, ironically, is their doing.
Half and half on this one. Your defense of the trans is, as always, hilarious. But I agree the 'defense of women' is a pretty silly argument. As I've always said, I want to defend reality, for the sake of reality. In some circumstances women would benefit from such a defense, but it's not the goal. Men are men, women are women, there's not a whole lot of leeway there. If we sex-segregate, for example, sports...men don't belong in women's sports. I don't give a damn about women's sports, but I care about logic and reality.
I'm not going to side with the trannies to own the women, just like I'm not going to side with the women to own the trannies. Keep trying.
"Your Country/Race Needs You" - The idea that those who don't want kids are betraying their country to "invaders".
I mean, I want natives to have children, that's vastly superior to drastically changing the culture with, yes, foreign invaders. Who...you realize, also include women...and procreate with them. You act like replacing one population with another somehow solves you 'women issue.' When they need women too...and are in fact often more matriarchal in fact.
I can inverse it for you. Fuck the idea that we need to import foreigners to have a bunch of children (with WHAMEN) just because we aren't having enough children (also with WHAMEN.)
It's a silly argument. Don't give unfair advantage to women, and don't give unfair advantages to non-native invaders. Each country has to protect its own people. Simple as.
We already know what the solution is, and it would probably work even at this late stage. Having seen women's true nature I'm far past the point of entertaining any kind of relationshit with one under any circumstances, but there are plenty of men who would report back to the plantation if the conditions there improved. But that involves women not getting their way, their whole way, and nothing but their way so the feminists will torpedo any attempt to fix the problem. Oh well. Let it burn.
Seriously, a lot of the bitches and cunts online, you know the type that scream 'SEXISM!' for something not going their way, they're hitting 40 or at least late 30 now and they've lost the slot to have kids so are panicking like crazy.
Men have the option to date younger (not epistein younger you predators) so can bypass the intitled that kept them out of the dating pool and go after the ones with daddy issues because their mother believed this feminist crap.
The real problem here is that she's framing things as if the dating market is equal to both men and women.
Women have all the power in the dating market, not men. Thus if women want a ceasefire, it needs to be women who call one not men and most definitely not in equal proportions between men and women. Most men that are dating just want a woman who is kind to them, likes to have sex, isn't a bad person, isn't ugly and isn't a slut/whore/single mother. Women on the other have absurd standards in men and demand too much from men. Women need to be the one to give not men.
I would rather side with anyone up to, but not including, the stormfaggots...than women.
LOL. The other day I ironically called you out for always bring up ze Jews, but come on. Random internet weirdo says something, and you still have to try to randomly insert and bash the "stormfaggots." Get a new shtick. At least the out and out women hate was taken to such an extreme that it was unique and sort of endearing. You've fallen off, and went from someone who was often sort of on point, but took it too far, but was entertaining, to cringe antagonistic weirdo. Take a few steps back and stop being so cringe.
We will win the gender war and you bastards will work for Jeff Bezos packing boxes the rest of your lives...
You do realize, despite its faults, Amazon is above average...or at the very least specifically above mode, right? Plenty of people would love to stack boxes for Jeff Bezos. I'm not one of them, for the record, but it's still worth pointing out. You could do a whole lot worse than Amazon warehouser, though.
Random Twitter bitch I've never heard of said what? Aforementioned random bitch is calling for unity? Oh, must be a massive conspiracy to kill all men. Man, I really hate women now.
There are plenty of reasons to hate women that having nothing to do with Imp or the Twitter bitch he linked.
I never said otherwise.
Although, for the record, I also think it's a bit extreme to write of entire portions of the population like that, no matter who they are. Take notice of, be wary of, tread carefully around, sure. But hate and write off completely? No.
Extreme? Yes. Unjustified? No. Their inherent nature combined with a legal system and rotten culture that enables their predatory behavior makes them a clear a present danger to my wellbeing, and the wellbeing of all men.
I mean, literally true. Biological reality. Guess I'm a simpcuck.
Half and half on this one. Your defense of the trans is, as always, hilarious. But I agree the 'defense of women' is a pretty silly argument. As I've always said, I want to defend reality, for the sake of reality. In some circumstances women would benefit from such a defense, but it's not the goal. Men are men, women are women, there's not a whole lot of leeway there. If we sex-segregate, for example, sports...men don't belong in women's sports. I don't give a damn about women's sports, but I care about logic and reality.
I'm not going to side with the trannies to own the women, just like I'm not going to side with the women to own the trannies. Keep trying.
I mean, I want natives to have children, that's vastly superior to drastically changing the culture with, yes, foreign invaders. Who...you realize, also include women...and procreate with them. You act like replacing one population with another somehow solves you 'women issue.' When they need women too...and are in fact often more matriarchal in fact.
I can inverse it for you. Fuck the idea that we need to import foreigners to have a bunch of children (with WHAMEN) just because we aren't having enough children (also with WHAMEN.)
It's a silly argument. Don't give unfair advantage to women, and don't give unfair advantages to non-native invaders. Each country has to protect its own people. Simple as.
We already know what the solution is, and it would probably work even at this late stage. Having seen women's true nature I'm far past the point of entertaining any kind of relationshit with one under any circumstances, but there are plenty of men who would report back to the plantation if the conditions there improved. But that involves women not getting their way, their whole way, and nothing but their way so the feminists will torpedo any attempt to fix the problem. Oh well. Let it burn.
The wall is approaching at mach speeds..
Seriously, a lot of the bitches and cunts online, you know the type that scream 'SEXISM!' for something not going their way, they're hitting 40 or at least late 30 now and they've lost the slot to have kids so are panicking like crazy.
Men have the option to date younger (not epistein younger you predators) so can bypass the intitled that kept them out of the dating pool and go after the ones with daddy issues because their mother believed this feminist crap.
The real problem here is that she's framing things as if the dating market is equal to both men and women.
Women have all the power in the dating market, not men. Thus if women want a ceasefire, it needs to be women who call one not men and most definitely not in equal proportions between men and women. Most men that are dating just want a woman who is kind to them, likes to have sex, isn't a bad person, isn't ugly and isn't a slut/whore/single mother. Women on the other have absurd standards in men and demand too much from men. Women need to be the one to give not men.
I don't know who this is but I see no problem with it.
LOL. The other day I ironically called you out for always bring up ze Jews, but come on. Random internet weirdo says something, and you still have to try to randomly insert and bash the "stormfaggots." Get a new shtick. At least the out and out women hate was taken to such an extreme that it was unique and sort of endearing. You've fallen off, and went from someone who was often sort of on point, but took it too far, but was entertaining, to cringe antagonistic weirdo. Take a few steps back and stop being so cringe.
You do realize, despite its faults, Amazon is above average...or at the very least specifically above mode, right? Plenty of people would love to stack boxes for Jeff Bezos. I'm not one of them, for the record, but it's still worth pointing out. You could do a whole lot worse than Amazon warehouser, though.