The unification narrative rises once more. No means no.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Random Twitter bitch I've never heard of said what? Aforementioned random bitch is calling for unity? Oh, must be a massive conspiracy to kill all men. Man, I really hate women now.
There are plenty of reasons to hate women that having nothing to do with Imp or the Twitter bitch he linked.
I never said otherwise.
Although, for the record, I also think it's a bit extreme to write of entire portions of the population like that, no matter who they are. Take notice of, be wary of, tread carefully around, sure. But hate and write off completely? No.
Extreme? Yes. Unjustified? No. Their inherent nature combined with a legal system and rotten culture that enables their predatory behavior makes them a clear a present danger to my wellbeing, and the wellbeing of all men.
It's not the first time. There's a weird building narrative that we should be allies with them and not enemies.
It's coming from three angles that I gave nicknames/labels to:
"Better Together" - The idea that we are lacking something without them. Tradcuckery fits under this banner, as well as garbage like the OP.
"The Trans Menace, Sponsored by Team DeSimp (est 2022)" - The idea that we should protect them from an issue that, ironically, is their doing.
"Your Country/Race Needs You" - The idea that those who don't want kids are betraying their country to "invaders".
Every call for unification between men and women fits under these labels.
I mean, literally true. Biological reality. Guess I'm a simpcuck.
Half and half on this one. Your defense of the trans is, as always, hilarious. But I agree the 'defense of women' is a pretty silly argument. As I've always said, I want to defend reality, for the sake of reality. In some circumstances women would benefit from such a defense, but it's not the goal. Men are men, women are women, there's not a whole lot of leeway there. If we sex-segregate, for example, sports...men don't belong in women's sports. I don't give a damn about women's sports, but I care about logic and reality.
I'm not going to side with the trannies to own the women, just like I'm not going to side with the women to own the trannies. Keep trying.
I mean, I want natives to have children, that's vastly superior to drastically changing the culture with, yes, foreign invaders. Who...you realize, also include women...and procreate with them. You act like replacing one population with another somehow solves you 'women issue.' When they need women too...and are in fact often more matriarchal in fact.
I can inverse it for you. Fuck the idea that we need to import foreigners to have a bunch of children (with WHAMEN) just because we aren't having enough children (also with WHAMEN.)
It's a silly argument. Don't give unfair advantage to women, and don't give unfair advantages to non-native invaders. Each country has to protect its own people. Simple as.
If they benefit, it shouldn't be done. It's really that simple.
I agree. Naturally allowing the population to reduce will help us survive better in a world where AI takes a lot of jobs.