Rampant whores creating a 10-1 spike in ten years isn’t exactly something I would argue against. Modern women being so stupid they don’t realize they have syphilis while pregnant is also nothing particularly surprising
I think the only problem I have with this idea is that it assumes modern women are 10x sluttier than older generations of women. Which requires modern women to be fucking on a level that would require time travel to squeeze in considering the default sluttery of the average woman through history.
Because the only reason we think pre-modern women weren't is because no one talked about it until the sluts started shouting it out loud themselves a few decades ago.
Virgins until marriage were vastly more common, 25% of women in the 1970s were virgins until marriage, it was less than 2% by 2005. The sexual revolution completely changed the dynamics of modern women, whereas before there were known whores, but they calibrated a minority not an overwhelming majority.
25% of women in the 1970s were virgins until marriage
Unless the people compiling this list were going in with their fingers and confirming it, all we have to go on is girls saying "oh yeah I'm totally a virgin." Stat's don't only lie when it benefits the otherside.
Feminism didn't change women's nature, it just let them be more open about it. Before they'd take their summer camp sexual romps to the grave, now they will make sure everyone knows it.
Also, even assuming what you said was reality, 3/4 of all women being nonvirginal before marriage at a time when that was still a big deal is a much worse situation than 98% at a time when it isn't even considered.
To be fair, having virtually no limitations could have changed some of the women's nature's. Throw in birth control and other drugs altering women's perceptions and sexual desires, as well as the rise in mental illness amongst women and who knows how different they are now compared to a century ago. Lots of them are probably freaks and deviants.
Which requires modern women to be fucking on a level that would require time travel to squeeze in
I mean they basically are. The hook-up apps and social laxity have increased the mating pool of every woman to literally millions of people. And not just hypothetically, they can literally choose from every man within driving distance. Transcending time and space. It wouldn't surprise me if top users are going through three+ partners per day.
To her credit, she didn't go through with it, but to your point, if she wanted to she had 10 easy-made matches assigned for a week-and-a-half of disease-catching/spreading.
Just imagine what the slatterns in their youth are doing and the bodycounts they're racking up?
You guys are coming at this from a place of "modern women are such whores!" whereas I'm saying "older women were massive whores too, you just didn't realize it."
Probably because that would mean having to accept that your (general) mother and grandmother were whores too, and that's too hard of a pill for most guys to deal. So they just pretend the sluttiness just started.
You're just factually incorrect is the problem. You can say "women were whores in the past" sure, but you just can't say that it hasn't increased massively, because it has. It wasn't physically possible for a woman in the 70s to even meet as many people as the average tinderette is sleeping with. Like, she could not physically go to enough bars and encounter that many suitable men. The technology has enabled an unprecedented change in behavior and the STD infection rates reflect this.
It doesn't have to be just one factor to get to the result.
Consider the state of health education. The number of uneducated or illegal immigrants who don't get treated. The spread of hookup culture, raising the number of sexual partners that some people are having and increasing the likelihood of transmitting STDs.
Right, I don't doubt the 10x STD increase is false. I just think "modern women are so slatternly they spread through sheer force of pussy" is giving women of the past a huge pussy pass and living under the optimism that women were innocent dainty things until feminism changed them to the core.
Like, WW1 and the "Summer of Love" are just two famous examples of something historically happening that made syphillis rates (among other STDs) skyrocket, with plenty of factors at play bigger than just whoring.
Rampant whores creating a 10-1 spike in ten years isn’t exactly something I would argue against. Modern women being so stupid they don’t realize they have syphilis while pregnant is also nothing particularly surprising
I would. Garden-variety promiscuity isn't the driver of STD transmission, it's drug addicts, African-Americans and gay men.
I think the only problem I have with this idea is that it assumes modern women are 10x sluttier than older generations of women. Which requires modern women to be fucking on a level that would require time travel to squeeze in considering the default sluttery of the average woman through history.
Because the only reason we think pre-modern women weren't is because no one talked about it until the sluts started shouting it out loud themselves a few decades ago.
Virgins until marriage were vastly more common, 25% of women in the 1970s were virgins until marriage, it was less than 2% by 2005. The sexual revolution completely changed the dynamics of modern women, whereas before there were known whores, but they calibrated a minority not an overwhelming majority.
Unless the people compiling this list were going in with their fingers and confirming it, all we have to go on is girls saying "oh yeah I'm totally a virgin." Stat's don't only lie when it benefits the otherside.
Feminism didn't change women's nature, it just let them be more open about it. Before they'd take their summer camp sexual romps to the grave, now they will make sure everyone knows it.
Also, even assuming what you said was reality, 3/4 of all women being nonvirginal before marriage at a time when that was still a big deal is a much worse situation than 98% at a time when it isn't even considered.
To be fair, having virtually no limitations could have changed some of the women's nature's. Throw in birth control and other drugs altering women's perceptions and sexual desires, as well as the rise in mental illness amongst women and who knows how different they are now compared to a century ago. Lots of them are probably freaks and deviants.
I mean they basically are. The hook-up apps and social laxity have increased the mating pool of every woman to literally millions of people. And not just hypothetically, they can literally choose from every man within driving distance. Transcending time and space. It wouldn't surprise me if top users are going through three+ partners per day.
A post-wall divorcee managed 10 matches to assign them to 10 days, almost instantly on Tinder -- all of whom were willing to do the deed: https://observer.com/2017/04/ten-tinder-dates-in-ten-days/
To her credit, she didn't go through with it, but to your point, if she wanted to she had 10 easy-made matches assigned for a week-and-a-half of disease-catching/spreading.
Just imagine what the slatterns in their youth are doing and the bodycounts they're racking up?
They can be, but that doesn't mean they are.
You guys are coming at this from a place of "modern women are such whores!" whereas I'm saying "older women were massive whores too, you just didn't realize it."
Probably because that would mean having to accept that your (general) mother and grandmother were whores too, and that's too hard of a pill for most guys to deal. So they just pretend the sluttiness just started.
You're just factually incorrect is the problem. You can say "women were whores in the past" sure, but you just can't say that it hasn't increased massively, because it has. It wasn't physically possible for a woman in the 70s to even meet as many people as the average tinderette is sleeping with. Like, she could not physically go to enough bars and encounter that many suitable men. The technology has enabled an unprecedented change in behavior and the STD infection rates reflect this.
It doesn't have to be just one factor to get to the result.
Consider the state of health education. The number of uneducated or illegal immigrants who don't get treated. The spread of hookup culture, raising the number of sexual partners that some people are having and increasing the likelihood of transmitting STDs.
Right, I don't doubt the 10x STD increase is false. I just think "modern women are so slatternly they spread through sheer force of pussy" is giving women of the past a huge pussy pass and living under the optimism that women were innocent dainty things until feminism changed them to the core.
Like, WW1 and the "Summer of Love" are just two famous examples of something historically happening that made syphillis rates (among other STDs) skyrocket, with plenty of factors at play bigger than just whoring.