Which requires modern women to be fucking on a level that would require time travel to squeeze in
I mean they basically are. The hook-up apps and social laxity have increased the mating pool of every woman to literally millions of people. And not just hypothetically, they can literally choose from every man within driving distance. Transcending time and space. It wouldn't surprise me if top users are going through three+ partners per day.
To her credit, she didn't go through with it, but to your point, if she wanted to she had 10 easy-made matches assigned for a week-and-a-half of disease-catching/spreading.
Just imagine what the slatterns in their youth are doing and the bodycounts they're racking up?
You guys are coming at this from a place of "modern women are such whores!" whereas I'm saying "older women were massive whores too, you just didn't realize it."
Probably because that would mean having to accept that your (general) mother and grandmother were whores too, and that's too hard of a pill for most guys to deal. So they just pretend the sluttiness just started.
You're just factually incorrect is the problem. You can say "women were whores in the past" sure, but you just can't say that it hasn't increased massively, because it has. It wasn't physically possible for a woman in the 70s to even meet as many people as the average tinderette is sleeping with. Like, she could not physically go to enough bars and encounter that many suitable men. The technology has enabled an unprecedented change in behavior and the STD infection rates reflect this.
The claim was that they are 10x more. There is a difference between "they are quite a bit sluttier because its so much easier to be" and "they are literally fucking plural guys a day every single day across the majority of them to reach astounding numbers."
Which requires both women of the past to be perfect prudes with minimal numbers and modern women to be doing absurd levels that would preclude basically any life outside fucking to reach.
average tinderette is sleeping with
You are assuming matches mean fucks, which is anything but reality and is also factually incorrect. I know most of my mid-sized big town's tinder sluts, the kind who have around 15 mean on retainer for instant calls whenever the urge strikes them and every single dude has matched with multiple times (because they delete them in a fit of some psychosis). I've seen their phone, its constantly blowing up with 20+ messages a minute and has hundreds of matched guys. You know how many times they are fucking those guys?
Around 1 every few days. Because they still have to have jobs, and lives outside of fucking, even if those lives are dumb slut things like drinking and partying that take up time. A limited resource that no amount of social changes can effect. Double so because after a short time frame they end up with a kid that takes up even more of that time, regardless of how shitty of a mom they are.
I mean they basically are. The hook-up apps and social laxity have increased the mating pool of every woman to literally millions of people. And not just hypothetically, they can literally choose from every man within driving distance. Transcending time and space. It wouldn't surprise me if top users are going through three+ partners per day.
A post-wall divorcee managed 10 matches to assign them to 10 days, almost instantly on Tinder -- all of whom were willing to do the deed: https://observer.com/2017/04/ten-tinder-dates-in-ten-days/
To her credit, she didn't go through with it, but to your point, if she wanted to she had 10 easy-made matches assigned for a week-and-a-half of disease-catching/spreading.
Just imagine what the slatterns in their youth are doing and the bodycounts they're racking up?
They can be, but that doesn't mean they are.
You guys are coming at this from a place of "modern women are such whores!" whereas I'm saying "older women were massive whores too, you just didn't realize it."
Probably because that would mean having to accept that your (general) mother and grandmother were whores too, and that's too hard of a pill for most guys to deal. So they just pretend the sluttiness just started.
You're just factually incorrect is the problem. You can say "women were whores in the past" sure, but you just can't say that it hasn't increased massively, because it has. It wasn't physically possible for a woman in the 70s to even meet as many people as the average tinderette is sleeping with. Like, she could not physically go to enough bars and encounter that many suitable men. The technology has enabled an unprecedented change in behavior and the STD infection rates reflect this.
The claim was that they are 10x more. There is a difference between "they are quite a bit sluttier because its so much easier to be" and "they are literally fucking plural guys a day every single day across the majority of them to reach astounding numbers."
Which requires both women of the past to be perfect prudes with minimal numbers and modern women to be doing absurd levels that would preclude basically any life outside fucking to reach.
You are assuming matches mean fucks, which is anything but reality and is also factually incorrect. I know most of my mid-sized big town's tinder sluts, the kind who have around 15 mean on retainer for instant calls whenever the urge strikes them and every single dude has matched with multiple times (because they delete them in a fit of some psychosis). I've seen their phone, its constantly blowing up with 20+ messages a minute and has hundreds of matched guys. You know how many times they are fucking those guys?
Around 1 every few days. Because they still have to have jobs, and lives outside of fucking, even if those lives are dumb slut things like drinking and partying that take up time. A limited resource that no amount of social changes can effect. Double so because after a short time frame they end up with a kid that takes up even more of that time, regardless of how shitty of a mom they are.