Why is Nick Fuentes still banned on twitter?
(twitter.com)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
No matter how you feel about what he says there are zero legitimate reasons to silence him
I wonder if there are still any normie libs stuck on the old "right-wingers break the rules more!" schtick. The Twitter Files (X-Files?) should have nailed the coffin shut on that notion - if people were paying attention. Those are the exact type of people who never pay attention until MSM gives them a new narrative, but I'm still hoping they got the truth from cultural osmosis by now.
Doesn't even have to be normie libs. Normies in general are so fucking blind to everything that has been going on they might as well be Patrick Star's roommate.
These are people who think Kyle Rittenhouse killed three black dudes.
These are people who believe 1/6 was an actual attempted coup and not a bunch of rowdy protestors who got false flagged into calmly walking into a public building.
These are people who legitimately believe Covid to be the deadliest disease in history and that crippling our economy for decades to come was worth it to save some morbidly obese immunocompromised fucksticks who would have died in a year from a heart attack anyway.
They wouldn't care about the twitter files even if they knew about them (which I doubt any of them do), because they believe what the talking box tells them and not what they see with their own eyes. God himself could descend from the heavens and demonstrate his divine power in front of their eyes, and they wouldn't believe it unless a "trusted news source" (aka the priest class) tells them to believe it. They will then proceed to perform whatever mental gymnastics they need to in order to overcome cognitive dissonance.
They are not human beings, at least not in the philosophical sense. They are more like walking automatons, drones, etc. They are intelligent enough to operate the computer, but not intelligent enough to wonder why they are operating it.
I agree. Even though he's a giant faggot, free speech is still important.
I think he's a homosexual virgin with very stupid views.
And he should not be silenced.
Most furries aren't virgins, so I doubt that's the case.
Does Elon have it out for him personally? That's apparently why Alex Jones is still banned.
He probably thinks Nick is too annoying and gay
He's more an American personality isn't he? My guess would be that Elon knows that Europe in general (but definitely the UK) is full emperor with no clothes right now and is just unbanning all 'extremist voices' to chuck dirt in their eyes.
I doubt he'll release many American ones UNTIL Trump is in office because the establishment there has already targeted his son by making him trans and are targeting his business through lawfare already, just nowhere near as much as Trump because he's not running for office and they need his rockets.
Seeing a white American suit not shill for his dual citizenship overlords is so weird.
Because Elon is not a free speech warrior. He just unbanned Tommy Robinson & Katie Hopkins more than a year after buying Twitter.
Myself and thousands of other plebs are still banned with no end in sight.
I believe he said that only larger accounts would be reviewed. Unfortunately.
Not at 1st, pretty sure in the early days he was talking about getting everyone's account reviewed.
Regardless, proves he's not a real free speech warrior.
No one is... I'll take good things as perfection is not on offer.
Elon said he was though, called himself a "free speech absolutist" then wouldn't unban Alex Jones because of personal fee-fees.
oh i forgot of course you'd hate him cause he said things against your tribe.
You know you guys do this shit on a regular basis to everyone else, right? Why are you complaining that other schitzo's are as fucking crazy as you?
It's against the rules to say that kind of thing here. We're an alt-tech ghetto. Those "other schizos" are in media organizations and the Israeli government. They also don't just talk. They're actually doing it.
As if you're friends wouldn't replicate it if given the opportunity. You're not objecting to what's being done or said, you're objecting to not being allowed to do it.
You're objecting to anyone who wants it to stop, crypto-neocon faggot.
I'm one of the few who wants it to stop.
Where did you say that?