If you read her bio (click the author name), it's an aging whore who could never find a man and keeps going through endless throngs of dudes. In other word, she's every "dating advice" columnist ever - desperately trying to tell herself that she has something to share, and subconsciously trying to drag other unsuspecting women down to her level with her horrible advice, typing from a tiny apartment that reeks of cat piss, cheap wine, and SSRIs.
She was going through a list of dating non-negotiables and casually mentioned that a friend of hers has now made a point of not sleeping with a guy until he has spent at least $2000 on dates with her.
Women holding their chastity for monetary value- what’s that called again? Oh a prostitute…
Then I let my mind wander to the couple of gents I’ve jumped into bed with after three to five dates and I thought, “sheesh if I was living by that theory I could probably have avoided a couple of mistakes.”
“I’m used goods, but you have to pay for my previous mistakes”
The first reason why this new rule is kinda growing on me is that if a guy is willing to go on enough dates to warrant $2000 out of pocket expense, then there’s a fair chance the guy is properly invested in you. I mean, if a libido can withstand that many dates, then he’s a keeper.
“He’s a keeper” is a funny way of saying guy I can milk for resources while giving nothing in return.
The second reason I like this rule, and I think most importantly, is spending that amount of time together without getting distracted by nakedness might actually help us get all those icks out of the way nice and early.
Then why is it purely tied to financial expenditure? You could do this crazy thing called waiting for marriage, or even waiting 3 months…
For example, I went on a couple of dates with a guy last year and felt comfortable in my decision to sleep with him after three dates. On the fourth date, however, I discovered he still let’s his mum do his laundry for him (he’s in his late 30s) and calls rosé wine “rose.” Eeek! I can’t be dating a man-child.
Had I waited until we reached that $2000 mark, I would have discovered all this long before he showed me his dad bod and I could have walked away feeling slightly less guilty.
This is a so called “dating expert”…
Perhaps, if we want to be a little less, dare I say – shallow – rather than basing the decision off money, we could base it off a checklist instead.
That checklist should include things like:
– What do they do for a job?
– Do they maintain basic adult responsibilities – like remembering to take the rubbish out, how to do laundry, can they cook a basic meal?
– Where do they live?
“Less shallow” is of course how much you make and where you live…
Calling this bitch a dating expert is like calling Hunter Biden a sobriety expert. She's a train wreck and Better Bachelor regularly calls out her retardation.
So-called "experts" on social topics have almost always been such fakes and frauds. I think it goes all the way back to stupid trends like "Dear Abby".
Thinking about it now I see a straight line from things like Dear Abby to leftist hellholes like r/AITA. The common thread is the need for external validation of one's moral choices. It's a very leftist and a very female need. I've only seen women and weak males seek that out. A man with solid moral compass is more interested in doing what's right than what's popular, and he's going to be a right winger.
I hate Islam as much as I hate feminists but I wish they'd skip a couple steps and start implementing some public woman-control measures here in the states.
I legitimately think the older roasties are trying to fuck over younger womens chances with bad advice at this point.
They are because they're competing for the same pool of men
But they're all worthless...
always has been
If I want to pay for sex I'll hire an escort. It's cheaper and she'd be better looking than this bitter hag.
https://resources.news.com.au/author-profiles/6ce214e1-d6d9-4e86-88ed-789df2f1fbce.png
Her face is too small for her head and she is very clearly over thirty. Opinion discarded.
Revealing quote:
Love life ruined by feminism but too stupid to recognise the problem.
If you read her bio (click the author name), it's an aging whore who could never find a man and keeps going through endless throngs of dudes. In other word, she's every "dating advice" columnist ever - desperately trying to tell herself that she has something to share, and subconsciously trying to drag other unsuspecting women down to her level with her horrible advice, typing from a tiny apartment that reeks of cat piss, cheap wine, and SSRIs.
Where do you find all these garbage articles? Is there a search engine that filters authors by IQ?
Man, you should see the Articles & News section on Kiwifarms, it's full of shit like this. You have to log in to see it, though.
I never made an account there.
Better Bachelor did a video on this. I'm not sure if that's where OP got this, but that's where I first saw it.
Women holding their chastity for monetary value- what’s that called again? Oh a prostitute…
“I’m used goods, but you have to pay for my previous mistakes”
“He’s a keeper” is a funny way of saying guy I can milk for resources while giving nothing in return.
Then why is it purely tied to financial expenditure? You could do this crazy thing called waiting for marriage, or even waiting 3 months…
This is a so called “dating expert”…
– What do they do for a job? – Do they maintain basic adult responsibilities – like remembering to take the rubbish out, how to do laundry, can they cook a basic meal? – Where do they live?
“Less shallow” is of course how much you make and where you live…
Calling this bitch a dating expert is like calling Hunter Biden a sobriety expert. She's a train wreck and Better Bachelor regularly calls out her retardation.
So-called "experts" on social topics have almost always been such fakes and frauds. I think it goes all the way back to stupid trends like "Dear Abby".
Thinking about it now I see a straight line from things like Dear Abby to leftist hellholes like r/AITA. The common thread is the need for external validation of one's moral choices. It's a very leftist and a very female need. I've only seen women and weak males seek that out. A man with solid moral compass is more interested in doing what's right than what's popular, and he's going to be a right winger.
No, women getting paid is prostitution.
This women is just advertising for restaurants, you pay them and she fucks you.
$2000 buys a pretty nice escort service. She's gonna have to compete with someone who has customer service on their mind.
So, if a woman regrets sex with a man after the fact, it's abuse, and the man's at fault.
And if a man regrets sex with a woman after the fact, it's abuse, and the man's at fault.
I think I see the agenda at play here...
I hate Islam as much as I hate feminists but I wish they'd skip a couple steps and start implementing some public woman-control measures here in the states.
Whores.