Really interesting how they were always super quick to jump on current trends to sell some shitty games in support of whatever is cool... but now it seems they're not taking either side. Kinda weird right? Really makes you think.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
As I've been saying it's because they can't figure out who's higher on the woke pecking order. Taking either side will result in a mob coming after them, so it's no longer a cost free virtue signal.
While leftists like to virtue signal about palastine, companies have stayed out of the conflict. They know enough to not piss off the ones holding the money.
There's no Israel bundle because any indie dev who contributed would be doxxed and destroyed by tranny terrorism and there’s no Palestine bundle because the people who control access to credit card processing and storefronts would Thanos snap any platform that had one into dust.
Probably because there's a few with a braincell working in charge realising they're in a position to stay quiet and go unnoticed.
I'm thinking of doing a post later on 'who's had the worst takes on Israel/Hamas war' as Pence came close losing any support he had left but then Mia Khalifa made such a braindead take that even the porn industry went 'we can't associate with you, even while taking it in the butt'
The israel conflict is one of the places where you see direct opposition between globalists/communists and zionists/neocons.
Everywhere else they are moving in parallel tracks and never really getting into direct conflict.
Globalists are against the concept of "nation", so part of their agenda is to weaken national sovereignty whenever possible. While this includes Israel they are usually not particularly vocal about that. They are in a bind because Israel's issues with the Palestinians are fundamentally the same issues Whites have with Blacks in the US.
Yeah, that infamous exclusively-white-and-totally-neither-Jewish-nor-Muslim-run Middle Eastern slave trade.
Sure we should have picked our own cotton but otherwise my analogy stands.
Also jews are at least partly to blame since they disproportionately owned both the slave ships, the slaves, and the debt incurred by plantation owners without which he couldn't afford the slave.
The British did. They invited mass immigration from the Arab world to counteract the mass Jewish immigration from Europe. Many "Palestinians" still have surnames like al-Misri or al-Yemeni that tell you where their families came from in the 1920s/1930s. And they were not "Palestinian" until the KGB started calling them that in the 1960s.
the most bizarro "current thing".