Position of power (teacher) over a person who would likely more vulnerable and easily influenced (under age student)
If men go to prison and possibly killed by other prisoners for doing the same to a 13 year old girl, I expect the same for her.
If you can't select out the millions who are over the age of consent, not in your care then quit teaching you degenerate as you're nothing more than a groomer.
Somehow our culture villainizes encouraging younger people to get married and have kids...so all we get is this one-sided cultural message where every mention of sex and dating is "it's bad".
Then that's not enough for the older crowd, so they start taking those emotions that are appropriate if the person was say a 5 year old and keep moving up the ages. This month someone told me anyone having sex with a pre-20 year old should be jailed for life and that's just fine with them.
If you can't select out the millions who are over the age of consent, not in your care then quit teaching you degenerate as you're nothing more than a groomer.
Yeah but that isn't "noose or pushed off a cliff". There's a situation where that makes sense but it's far away from what I see in this one.
I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
Got nothing against the thoughts, it's EVERYTHING about the action. Choosing to act on it and rape (since an older person in their 20s having sex with someone before age of consent is rape) deserves punishment.
Since this is age of consent, the punishment varies on place, if you had a teacher having sex with a 17 year old student in the states, that's likely prison, a lot of Europe, disciplinary action and probable dismissal. No matter what because of the teacher/student dynamic it's just inappropriate at least, coercion at worst, if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent and there isn't this dynamic, that's retarded.
if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent
That's the problem though. Even though his point doesn't have much to do with this story, I can agree with him that the "age of consent" line is silly and arbitrarily, and keeps getting pushed up for ridiculous social reasons.
But you do have to set it somewhere. The punishment should be graduated based on the age of each side. So no a 13 year old isn't the same as a 5 year old. Still gross
I will agree as pre pubescent child is WAY different to teenager but we can't let it be known punishment wise and we should act like ANYTHING before age of consent if your in your 20s and more gets the axe.
Why? Because when people KNOW that a crime isn't going to be punished as harshly anymore, they tend to do the crime more and more and push the boundaries. It's bad enough people do that with looting and stealing, I DO NOT want that same attitude applied to sex.
We have age of consent laws that we agreed to as a society and for they're not hard to abide by. Don't have sex with someone older till this age.
If men get harshly punished for having sex with someone a year below that age, same punishment for women. Saying anything else is giving preferential treatment by gender.
If you don't agree with that, change the law. But for that you'd need public approval and sure you'll get it probably in far left areas but EVERYONE else will probably oppose you.
Yeah people here often go a bit over the top with things like that. Its kind of like a twisted form of virtue signaling. She should definitely lose her job and be barred from teaching, but death penalty is a bit much. I would say she's likely a bad person, but unless it was forced I would not immediately call her a monster.
In related news have you ever seen one of these online cult-via-zoom group that these posters are part of? It's crazy to think we've recreated all that 70's "drink the coolaid" stuff.
Position of power (teacher) over a person who would likely more vulnerable and easily influenced (under age student)
If men go to prison and possibly killed by other prisoners for doing the same to a 13 year old girl, I expect the same for her.
If you can't select out the millions who are over the age of consent, not in your care then quit teaching you degenerate as you're nothing more than a groomer.
It's just what's happening.
Somehow our culture villainizes encouraging younger people to get married and have kids...so all we get is this one-sided cultural message where every mention of sex and dating is "it's bad".
Then that's not enough for the older crowd, so they start taking those emotions that are appropriate if the person was say a 5 year old and keep moving up the ages. This month someone told me anyone having sex with a pre-20 year old should be jailed for life and that's just fine with them.
Yeah but that isn't "noose or pushed off a cliff". There's a situation where that makes sense but it's far away from what I see in this one.
I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
Got nothing against the thoughts, it's EVERYTHING about the action. Choosing to act on it and rape (since an older person in their 20s having sex with someone before age of consent is rape) deserves punishment.
Since this is age of consent, the punishment varies on place, if you had a teacher having sex with a 17 year old student in the states, that's likely prison, a lot of Europe, disciplinary action and probable dismissal. No matter what because of the teacher/student dynamic it's just inappropriate at least, coercion at worst, if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent and there isn't this dynamic, that's retarded.
That's the problem though. Even though his point doesn't have much to do with this story, I can agree with him that the "age of consent" line is silly and arbitrarily, and keeps getting pushed up for ridiculous social reasons.
But you do have to set it somewhere. The punishment should be graduated based on the age of each side. So no a 13 year old isn't the same as a 5 year old. Still gross
I will agree as pre pubescent child is WAY different to teenager but we can't let it be known punishment wise and we should act like ANYTHING before age of consent if your in your 20s and more gets the axe.
Why? Because when people KNOW that a crime isn't going to be punished as harshly anymore, they tend to do the crime more and more and push the boundaries. It's bad enough people do that with looting and stealing, I DO NOT want that same attitude applied to sex.
I'm familiar with this tactic from "Rules For Radicals" but that's all it is, a tactic.
You seem to have no conscious about what you're doing.
We have age of consent laws that we agreed to as a society and for they're not hard to abide by. Don't have sex with someone older till this age.
If men get harshly punished for having sex with someone a year below that age, same punishment for women. Saying anything else is giving preferential treatment by gender.
If you don't agree with that, change the law. But for that you'd need public approval and sure you'll get it probably in far left areas but EVERYONE else will probably oppose you.
Yeah people here often go a bit over the top with things like that. Its kind of like a twisted form of virtue signaling. She should definitely lose her job and be barred from teaching, but death penalty is a bit much. I would say she's likely a bad person, but unless it was forced I would not immediately call her a monster.
Yeah, that's what I was saying.
In related news have you ever seen one of these online cult-via-zoom group that these posters are part of? It's crazy to think we've recreated all that 70's "drink the coolaid" stuff.