Buddy the social narrative of confusing 5 year olds with 13 year olds is why the western world has become a nation of incels.
"Noose or pushed off a cliff" for someone who's at the earliest age people use to get married? This is why you end up with your kids being an evolutionary dead end and replaced with kids from countries that aren't this manipulated.
Position of power (teacher) over a person who would likely more vulnerable and easily influenced (under age student)
If men go to prison and possibly killed by other prisoners for doing the same to a 13 year old girl, I expect the same for her.
If you can't select out the millions who are over the age of consent, not in your care then quit teaching you degenerate as you're nothing more than a groomer.
Somehow our culture villainizes encouraging younger people to get married and have kids...so all we get is this one-sided cultural message where every mention of sex and dating is "it's bad".
Then that's not enough for the older crowd, so they start taking those emotions that are appropriate if the person was say a 5 year old and keep moving up the ages. This month someone told me anyone having sex with a pre-20 year old should be jailed for life and that's just fine with them.
If you can't select out the millions who are over the age of consent, not in your care then quit teaching you degenerate as you're nothing more than a groomer.
Yeah but that isn't "noose or pushed off a cliff". There's a situation where that makes sense but it's far away from what I see in this one.
I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
Got nothing against the thoughts, it's EVERYTHING about the action. Choosing to act on it and rape (since an older person in their 20s having sex with someone before age of consent is rape) deserves punishment.
Since this is age of consent, the punishment varies on place, if you had a teacher having sex with a 17 year old student in the states, that's likely prison, a lot of Europe, disciplinary action and probable dismissal. No matter what because of the teacher/student dynamic it's just inappropriate at least, coercion at worst, if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent and there isn't this dynamic, that's retarded.
Yeah people here often go a bit over the top with things like that. Its kind of like a twisted form of virtue signaling. She should definitely lose her job and be barred from teaching, but death penalty is a bit much. I would say she's likely a bad person, but unless it was forced I would not immediately call her a monster.
I still stand by execution by curettage, still legal for D&C abortions in every US State and doesn’t violate the 8th amendment. Plus it would make great mulch/ fertilizer
I would normally say 'if proven guilty' but there's fucking video evidence of her raping the kid.
Noose or pushed off a cliff, let's go ecofriendly/renewable with our execution methods.
Buddy the social narrative of confusing 5 year olds with 13 year olds is why the western world has become a nation of incels.
"Noose or pushed off a cliff" for someone who's at the earliest age people use to get married? This is why you end up with your kids being an evolutionary dead end and replaced with kids from countries that aren't this manipulated.
Position of power (teacher) over a person who would likely more vulnerable and easily influenced (under age student)
If men go to prison and possibly killed by other prisoners for doing the same to a 13 year old girl, I expect the same for her.
If you can't select out the millions who are over the age of consent, not in your care then quit teaching you degenerate as you're nothing more than a groomer.
It's just what's happening.
Somehow our culture villainizes encouraging younger people to get married and have kids...so all we get is this one-sided cultural message where every mention of sex and dating is "it's bad".
Then that's not enough for the older crowd, so they start taking those emotions that are appropriate if the person was say a 5 year old and keep moving up the ages. This month someone told me anyone having sex with a pre-20 year old should be jailed for life and that's just fine with them.
Yeah but that isn't "noose or pushed off a cliff". There's a situation where that makes sense but it's far away from what I see in this one.
I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
Got nothing against the thoughts, it's EVERYTHING about the action. Choosing to act on it and rape (since an older person in their 20s having sex with someone before age of consent is rape) deserves punishment.
Since this is age of consent, the punishment varies on place, if you had a teacher having sex with a 17 year old student in the states, that's likely prison, a lot of Europe, disciplinary action and probable dismissal. No matter what because of the teacher/student dynamic it's just inappropriate at least, coercion at worst, if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent and there isn't this dynamic, that's retarded.
Yeah people here often go a bit over the top with things like that. Its kind of like a twisted form of virtue signaling. She should definitely lose her job and be barred from teaching, but death penalty is a bit much. I would say she's likely a bad person, but unless it was forced I would not immediately call her a monster.
I still stand by execution by curettage, still legal for D&C abortions in every US State and doesn’t violate the 8th amendment. Plus it would make great mulch/ fertilizer
Good thinking, reusing of biomass for a better use!
Only reason I included cliff is I wanted to do this to pedos