I can remember a few teachers who I would have loved to see topless when I was in school. "Have those thoughts and they deserve to die" is a fucked up message.
Got nothing against the thoughts, it's EVERYTHING about the action. Choosing to act on it and rape (since an older person in their 20s having sex with someone before age of consent is rape) deserves punishment.
Since this is age of consent, the punishment varies on place, if you had a teacher having sex with a 17 year old student in the states, that's likely prison, a lot of Europe, disciplinary action and probable dismissal. No matter what because of the teacher/student dynamic it's just inappropriate at least, coercion at worst, if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent and there isn't this dynamic, that's retarded.
if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent
That's the problem though. Even though his point doesn't have much to do with this story, I can agree with him that the "age of consent" line is silly and arbitrarily, and keeps getting pushed up for ridiculous social reasons.
But you do have to set it somewhere. The punishment should be graduated based on the age of each side. So no a 13 year old isn't the same as a 5 year old. Still gross
I will agree as pre pubescent child is WAY different to teenager but we can't let it be known punishment wise and we should act like ANYTHING before age of consent if your in your 20s and more gets the axe.
Why? Because when people KNOW that a crime isn't going to be punished as harshly anymore, they tend to do the crime more and more and push the boundaries. It's bad enough people do that with looting and stealing, I DO NOT want that same attitude applied to sex.
We have age of consent laws that we agreed to as a society and for they're not hard to abide by. Don't have sex with someone older till this age.
If men get harshly punished for having sex with someone a year below that age, same punishment for women. Saying anything else is giving preferential treatment by gender.
If you don't agree with that, change the law. But for that you'd need public approval and sure you'll get it probably in far left areas but EVERYONE else will probably oppose you.
We're back to what I said to begin with, you're calling for the murder and killing of people - because they mildly upset your sensibilities.
We have age of consent laws that we agreed to as a society
Like I said in my post, in my grandparents generation people were getting setup to be married at this age. You are saying you want to kill and mutilate people for that exact same age range.
I did not claim the actions of this person were 100% right or didn't deserve any response / negative consequence.
I took issue with your sense of "morality" where you think a teen having consensual sex calls for killing and mutilating the people involved.
Got nothing against the thoughts, it's EVERYTHING about the action. Choosing to act on it and rape (since an older person in their 20s having sex with someone before age of consent is rape) deserves punishment.
Since this is age of consent, the punishment varies on place, if you had a teacher having sex with a 17 year old student in the states, that's likely prison, a lot of Europe, disciplinary action and probable dismissal. No matter what because of the teacher/student dynamic it's just inappropriate at least, coercion at worst, if you're talking about trying to infantilise AFTER age of consent and there isn't this dynamic, that's retarded.
That's the problem though. Even though his point doesn't have much to do with this story, I can agree with him that the "age of consent" line is silly and arbitrarily, and keeps getting pushed up for ridiculous social reasons.
But you do have to set it somewhere. The punishment should be graduated based on the age of each side. So no a 13 year old isn't the same as a 5 year old. Still gross
I will agree as pre pubescent child is WAY different to teenager but we can't let it be known punishment wise and we should act like ANYTHING before age of consent if your in your 20s and more gets the axe.
Why? Because when people KNOW that a crime isn't going to be punished as harshly anymore, they tend to do the crime more and more and push the boundaries. It's bad enough people do that with looting and stealing, I DO NOT want that same attitude applied to sex.
I'm familiar with this tactic from "Rules For Radicals" but that's all it is, a tactic.
You seem to have no conscious about what you're doing.
We have age of consent laws that we agreed to as a society and for they're not hard to abide by. Don't have sex with someone older till this age.
If men get harshly punished for having sex with someone a year below that age, same punishment for women. Saying anything else is giving preferential treatment by gender.
If you don't agree with that, change the law. But for that you'd need public approval and sure you'll get it probably in far left areas but EVERYONE else will probably oppose you.
We're back to what I said to begin with, you're calling for the murder and killing of people - because they mildly upset your sensibilities.
Like I said in my post, in my grandparents generation people were getting setup to be married at this age. You are saying you want to kill and mutilate people for that exact same age range.
I did not claim the actions of this person were 100% right or didn't deserve any response / negative consequence.
I took issue with your sense of "morality" where you think a teen having consensual sex calls for killing and mutilating the people involved.