She's already been a Minister and was one of the guiding lights behind the online safety bill.
That's why I'm worried that her letter isn't simply over-reach of a fantastically over-zealous Select Committee Chairwoman. She's very connected and I struggle to imagine she didn't at least have tacit permission from many Westminster voices before doing this.
We don't censor, we just advice companies about possible issues and how to correct them. We do not demand compliance, it is completely optional (if you wish to operate in this country...).
-That bitch.
From what I understand, Ofcom already have a lot of power and certainly do not need more.
Yes this isn't just some attention-whoring rogue feminist. Just check her infobox on shittipedia or wherever, she's been well integrated in key departments and committees for years. They all have her back.
Standard home wreaking whore being a home wreaking whore. These kinds of women THRIVE on attention and ruining the success and happiness of others.....because they can
Her constituency was a 'conservative' safe seat and she was their representative after the previous guy, a former RAF airman, retired in 2010 (in an expenses scandal). She was the slop (or as the French say, salope?) that the Tory party served up for their voters there, if they wanted to avoid the seat turning red.
Also she's now a Lord, so there's no question of electing her or unelecting her any more.
She's already been a Minister and was one of the guiding lights behind the online safety bill.
That's why I'm worried that her letter isn't simply over-reach of a fantastically over-zealous Select Committee Chairwoman. She's very connected and I struggle to imagine she didn't at least have tacit permission from many Westminster voices before doing this.
We don't censor, we just advice companies about possible issues and how to correct them. We do not demand compliance, it is completely optional (if you wish to operate in this country...).
-That bitch.
From what I understand, Ofcom already have a lot of power and certainly do not need more.
Yes this isn't just some attention-whoring rogue feminist. Just check her infobox on shittipedia or wherever, she's been well integrated in key departments and committees for years. They all have her back.
Or, possibly, she has theirs.
She is also pressuring GB News to STOP giving him a chance to defend himself :
https://x.com/alexandrosm/status/1704714707196956874
Fucking disgusting behavior.
Standard home wreaking whore being a home wreaking whore. These kinds of women THRIVE on attention and ruining the success and happiness of others.....because they can
“Cutie?” No.
The woman in the picture is 41?....Oooooofffff
She’s a 4 going on 1.
Maybe the UK shouldnt vote for slags
Her constituency was a 'conservative' safe seat and she was their representative after the previous guy, a former RAF airman, retired in 2010 (in an expenses scandal). She was the slop (or as the French say, salope?) that the Tory party served up for their voters there, if they wanted to avoid the seat turning red.
Also she's now a Lord, so there's no question of electing her or unelecting her any more.
Punishments for these kinds of people are going to have to be unbelievably cruel and draconian for decades if we're ever going to start fixing things.
Capital punishment. Simple.
Is she the one who claims he raped her or is she a journalist trying to ruin him?