In order to "send a signal to the world". The new law doesn't just include the burning of any holy book, not just the Quran, but will "prohibit the inappropriate treatment of objects of significant religious importance to a religious community". That will also include the ideas, beliefs and critique of the text in said holy books. Such as what happened with Salman Rushdie with The Satanic Verses or Richard Dawkins critiques of creationism and intelligent design. Both of which have caused offence to religious individuals and even resulted in Government condemnation, civil unrest and violence. Violation of the law will result in fines and two years imprisonment.
The only stance not covered by the law will be atheism.
Place your bets on this law being selectively enforced
Any case with a political undertone will be selectively enforced.
Yet another example that Islam is incompatible with civilization.
When civil rights have to be destroyed because they cannot control their violent, urges, they do not belong!
We're destroying civilization to cater to terrorists and savages.
I mean at this rate the Muslim world will be our successors.
Banditry and slavery flourishes in the dark ages? Get outta here!
I'm fucking fed up of this as well and it's enough to make you hide in a desert or mountain in the middle of nowhere and watch the world burn.
Not that there is any difference in Europe, but the government in Denmark is not "center-right". They are social democrats (i..e, neoliberal center-left) who, quite uniquely for neoliberals of any kind in Europe, oppose immigration.
Europeans think that Stalin was a centrist and it's the rest of the world that's far right.
It depends on the issue. Almost everyone in Europe supports a welfare state, at least to some extent, but things are more complicated when it comes to race, Islam or troonery.
nah, it is rather simple. just look to austria for the most open example.
after ww2 the social-democrats went into a coalition with the most right-wing party allowed. they simply copied national-socialist policies and sold them as social-democracy.
ofc the jews of the spö responsible for that quite smart move died off and nowadays the spö is an ACTUAL social-democrat party. which means judeo-marxist.
when europeans whine about just wanting old-school social-democracy, they actually mean national-socialism.
A worthless law. If burning a book is getting national attention in your country then you've got significant underlying problems in your country that need fixing first. This type of law is shotty patchwork.
I do wonder how the Danish Government will react when fundamental religious individuals and countries protest against the freedom to be gay in Denmark, as forbidden by the text in their holy books? This is where religious politics and progressive politics will clash in terms of this law.
Canada has an explicit exception in several laws, like those that ban animal torture or incitement of hate based on race and religion :
It's okay if it is founded in ''sincere religious beliefs''.
What is ''sincere religious belief''? First don't be White, then they'll consider it's possible you're ''sincere'' depending on the Intersectional Hierarchy.
The Muslim/LGBT civil war is going to come to a head soon because of all these contradictions, even the WEF won't be able to keep it contained for long, I cannot wait for the infighting.
(The sound of a hundred million boomers crying "BUT IT'S JUST LIKE THE NAZIS" can be heard in the distance)
Islamization doesn't exist. It's a conspiracy theory!