No matter our differences, we can all agree that belligerent midwit atheists are the most insufferable of all cunts.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (132)
sorted by:
I was previously one. A lolbert who thought he was "above it all".
Looking back I realize that repeating dawkins retardation was a way to avoid thinking about a serious subject and pretend I was in the "smart" club.
But now I know the war isn't left vs right, though the lines are usually arrayed that way, it really is Order vs Chaos. Chaos being the gay commie globalists who will use any means at their disposal to dissolve civilization.
Something I recently came to understand was when the Christians say "this isn't something you can reason yourself into: you either 'get it' or you don't".
Because there's some intuitive sense I get where I say "these people are demons", and I have trouble even explaining that sense to Christians even if they also intuitively understand "yeah those aren't good people" but may be uncomfortable declaring them "demons".
I would be wholly incapable of explaining that intuition to even myself 5 years ago, and I think even my Christian self 20 years ago would tell me today "yeah maybe you should see someone about that."
Possession is real. It's ideological possession, in modern parlance, but the powers and principalities represented are still very much Satanic. Because Leftism is the gospel of envy, the old metaphors and understandings still hold.
"Hell is empty and the all the devils are here." The Tempest Act 1, Scene 2, Shakespeare
Wait, so can we call it Former Hell now?
Shakespeare is poetry, not theology.
I used to have trouble believing in demons, till Obama became president and the left dropped the charade and showed how bat shit insane it was. Now, I understand why the old religion was so strict and hard on the wicked.
About 6 months to a year ago I found myself saying "I'm not sure I believe in god, but I believe in the Devil because I see so many people act in service to him."
There's a certain sense where I can honestly see why people have an easier time being a Satanist than a Christian, because people acting in the furtherance of that being's (if it actually exists) ends are so much easier to find.
There's some reasoning involved for me, but it's mostly things like 'We as a species don't know nearly as much as we think we do,' which I use to navigate the obstacles my rational side tries to throw in the way of my faith. Intuition is still very necessary, and not just in matters of faith either.
Progressives only ever use reason as an argument when they want you to abandon your gut instinct. Most of the time they don't give a flying fuck about what's rational, they live by the creed 'my feels over objective reals, Nazi scum', but the second your healthy intuition rejects their sick web of propaganda, suddenly (their mangled version of) rationality is back on the menu!
Demon is synonymous with evil so it isn't surprising that you feel that way. I don't think that lends any credence to a specific religion.
I would not be able to claim to be a Satanist given the behaviors i consider "demonic" and my negative association with those behaviors.
None of which say anything about whether or not any of it is true, but it does speak to compatibility with a particular religion.
looking back 20 years (i'm well older), atheism was always a shit take. even for the 140+ IQ crowd, the hottest take you can legitimately defend is a stochastic agnosticism, and if you're not deep into applied statistics (e.g. robotic vision), you're still half baked, you have no fucking clue what you're talking about in epistemology.
i was doing relativity at fucking 14 years old and there's till too much shit that's not even explanable. i don't mean explained. i mean explanable.
the nuts part is taking enough redpills to realize what is and isn't correct in each of the major religions. yes, religion is a mechanism of societal control.
and every society that does not control female hypergamy and guarantee that 50%+ of beta males will get theirs... well they get crushed by those societies who do.
That's the part you can never get through to most atheists. When you acknowledge that maybe there isn't a god, but that belief in one is good for a lot of people and that that social control is a far better methodology than control through government tyranny.
Like, Religion figured out how to prevent people from dying of pork parasites without having to commit extinction level genocide on pigs or having to explain to people things beyond their ability to comprehend.
If I recall correctly, I think Dawkins himself came to this conclusion or something similar... religious faith is important to us on a biological level, and without 'God' people will find something to place faith in.
Quite literally the devil you know vs the one you don't. And he said this before the coof came around and proved him right.
Even actual retards can come to that conclusion a decade+ ago with the evidence directly in front of us, watching people create cults and ideologies and brands to fill the hole religion used to. Heck you could see it literally happening in real time in the 60s to the hippies.
Dawkins was an arrogant prick who always has to be controversial and "right." So of course he would change sides after helping damn us all to ruin.
That's straight out of Jordan Peterson's Jungian rap about the intersection of religion and psychology.
In my younger days, I went from believing to uncertainty, but Pascal's wager seemed like a fair assessment of the situation, so my behavior didn't change much.
What is the cost to me of living a good life, even if it doesn't give me a thrill?
I often forget about that. Maybe I should go back to church.
Your description fits me to a T, as well!