You might think you hate journos and academics enough, but you really don't. But hey, she still held back - was it Kinsey who published Very Serious Scientific Research claiming that if we don't outright molest toddlers they'll grow up to be fascists?
The Vagina Monologues presented that if women don't rape younger girls (with "good rape") they won't grow up to be a feminist proper, so that's one someone who did.
Well many someones, as it was a very popular piece of work performed by many people who clearly approved of it to keep that in.
I mean, journalism professor starts pretty low for me. Somewhere around where I'd put a conman. In other words, someone whose "job" actively harms society.
It's too stupid that they think they can be that brazen about being pedophiles, no hyperbole. If your argument in anyway contains 'we should show our genitalia to children's as a part of it, your a pedophile and the consequences should range from restraining order to be near kids and on a list to death penalty if you ACTIVELY try to do this.
In a just world, this dumb whore would never even think about anything like this.
I don't actually think this bitch is a pedophile, I think she's, may Allah forgive me for uttering this word, a liberal. (Surprising for a Canadian journo prof with a sideshave, I know.) She'll say whatever is "in" at the moment, and right now, the "in" thing is advocating for trannies to expose themselves to children. If the mainstream did a complete 180, a week later she'd be advocating for all troons to be fed into wood chippers, and she'd never think about it, because she simply does not think at all, about anything, ever. These people are devoid of any curiosity and they're incapable of comparing anything from the past to today, they either never had any capacity to recognize patterns or it's been destroyed, so they just follow instructions. They don't suffer from cognitive dissonance because there's no cognition going on at all.
But normal people don't control the mainstream, so she's not going to start advocating for wood chippers, and she's definitely not going to get rid of that ridiculous haircut and turn into a normal person who isn't a burden on society, so all we can do is the next best thing: cause her and people like her so much pain that they become terrified to open their mouths. They can't be reasoned with, the same way you don't reason with a puppy who shits on your carpet, it's pointless - again, there's no cognition. And it's not shutting down free speech, because these soulless meat automatons never spoke freely in the first place. Sewing their mouths shut, metaphorically or IRL, has only benefits - humanity would lose nothing.
They are only SLIGHTLY less dangerous than the actual predators, no joke. Why, because they enable the predators to operate, these are the parents that TAKE their kids to the drag shows, they actively give/feed them to the demons.
I'd rather go with you're idea of fear and terrified of acting for these people. At least puppies grow into dogs that learn both hierarchy of who's the master and cognitive functions, these people are sheep that would follow the flock onto a highway with no reluctance.
I argue that, morally speaking, there is no meaningful difference between the monsters and the liberals who enable them. Given that each crime is worthy of the same penalty, death.
Why I said slightly, it's the difference between a serial killer that has killed 4 people and one that's in the double digits, you're both getting the chair anyway but we can say the latter is just a bit more evil.
Archive
The tweet in question
You might think you hate journos and academics enough, but you really don't. But hey, she still held back - was it Kinsey who published Very Serious Scientific Research claiming that if we don't outright molest toddlers they'll grow up to be fascists?
Kinsey did fucked up "experiments" with children but I think it was someone else (perhaps multiple someones) who famously said that.
The Vagina Monologues presented that if women don't rape younger girls (with "good rape") they won't grow up to be a feminist proper, so that's one someone who did.
Well many someones, as it was a very popular piece of work performed by many people who clearly approved of it to keep that in.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bioAhR4PB9c
Sometimes life becomes a parody of parody.
I mean, journalism professor starts pretty low for me. Somewhere around where I'd put a conman. In other words, someone whose "job" actively harms society.
In a just world, this would be the immediate response to posting that.
It's too stupid that they think they can be that brazen about being pedophiles, no hyperbole. If your argument in anyway contains 'we should show our genitalia to children's as a part of it, your a pedophile and the consequences should range from restraining order to be near kids and on a list to death penalty if you ACTIVELY try to do this.
In a just world, this dumb whore would never even think about anything like this.
I don't actually think this bitch is a pedophile, I think she's, may Allah forgive me for uttering this word, a liberal. (Surprising for a Canadian journo prof with a sideshave, I know.) She'll say whatever is "in" at the moment, and right now, the "in" thing is advocating for trannies to expose themselves to children. If the mainstream did a complete 180, a week later she'd be advocating for all troons to be fed into wood chippers, and she'd never think about it, because she simply does not think at all, about anything, ever. These people are devoid of any curiosity and they're incapable of comparing anything from the past to today, they either never had any capacity to recognize patterns or it's been destroyed, so they just follow instructions. They don't suffer from cognitive dissonance because there's no cognition going on at all.
But normal people don't control the mainstream, so she's not going to start advocating for wood chippers, and she's definitely not going to get rid of that ridiculous haircut and turn into a normal person who isn't a burden on society, so all we can do is the next best thing: cause her and people like her so much pain that they become terrified to open their mouths. They can't be reasoned with, the same way you don't reason with a puppy who shits on your carpet, it's pointless - again, there's no cognition. And it's not shutting down free speech, because these soulless meat automatons never spoke freely in the first place. Sewing their mouths shut, metaphorically or IRL, has only benefits - humanity would lose nothing.
They are only SLIGHTLY less dangerous than the actual predators, no joke. Why, because they enable the predators to operate, these are the parents that TAKE their kids to the drag shows, they actively give/feed them to the demons.
I'd rather go with you're idea of fear and terrified of acting for these people. At least puppies grow into dogs that learn both hierarchy of who's the master and cognitive functions, these people are sheep that would follow the flock onto a highway with no reluctance.
I argue that, morally speaking, there is no meaningful difference between the monsters and the liberals who enable them. Given that each crime is worthy of the same penalty, death.
Why I said slightly, it's the difference between a serial killer that has killed 4 people and one that's in the double digits, you're both getting the chair anyway but we can say the latter is just a bit more evil.
Well that's the conundrum I suppose. Once the threshold is crossed it's merely a matter of how dramatic the public execution should be.
Journalism professors should be exposed to the vaccuum of space
Official pedophile transparency. Trannies are a fetish that want children.
rope
"people"?
Well if we're making outlandish and controversial statements why stop there? We should also teach kids how to tie nooses.
I swear I can remember a time when there would have been negative consequences for saying something like this.
👃 🤔
I have a suggestion for what journalism professors should be exposed to...