I argue that, morally speaking, there is no meaningful difference between the monsters and the liberals who enable them. Given that each crime is worthy of the same penalty, death.
Why I said slightly, it's the difference between a serial killer that has killed 4 people and one that's in the double digits, you're both getting the chair anyway but we can say the latter is just a bit more evil.
I argue that, morally speaking, there is no meaningful difference between the monsters and the liberals who enable them. Given that each crime is worthy of the same penalty, death.
Why I said slightly, it's the difference between a serial killer that has killed 4 people and one that's in the double digits, you're both getting the chair anyway but we can say the latter is just a bit more evil.
Well that's the conundrum I suppose. Once the threshold is crossed it's merely a matter of how dramatic the public execution should be.