It's too stupid that they think they can be that brazen about being pedophiles, no hyperbole. If your argument in anyway contains 'we should show our genitalia to children's as a part of it, your a pedophile and the consequences should range from restraining order to be near kids and on a list to death penalty if you ACTIVELY try to do this.
In a just world, this dumb whore would never even think about anything like this.
I don't actually think this bitch is a pedophile, I think she's, may Allah forgive me for uttering this word, a liberal. (Surprising for a Canadian journo prof with a sideshave, I know.) She'll say whatever is "in" at the moment, and right now, the "in" thing is advocating for trannies to expose themselves to children. If the mainstream did a complete 180, a week later she'd be advocating for all troons to be fed into wood chippers, and she'd never think about it, because she simply does not think at all, about anything, ever. These people are devoid of any curiosity and they're incapable of comparing anything from the past to today, they either never had any capacity to recognize patterns or it's been destroyed, so they just follow instructions. They don't suffer from cognitive dissonance because there's no cognition going on at all.
But normal people don't control the mainstream, so she's not going to start advocating for wood chippers, and she's definitely not going to get rid of that ridiculous haircut and turn into a normal person who isn't a burden on society, so all we can do is the next best thing: cause her and people like her so much pain that they become terrified to open their mouths. They can't be reasoned with, the same way you don't reason with a puppy who shits on your carpet, it's pointless - again, there's no cognition. And it's not shutting down free speech, because these soulless meat automatons never spoke freely in the first place. Sewing their mouths shut, metaphorically or IRL, has only benefits - humanity would lose nothing.
They are only SLIGHTLY less dangerous than the actual predators, no joke. Why, because they enable the predators to operate, these are the parents that TAKE their kids to the drag shows, they actively give/feed them to the demons.
I'd rather go with you're idea of fear and terrified of acting for these people. At least puppies grow into dogs that learn both hierarchy of who's the master and cognitive functions, these people are sheep that would follow the flock onto a highway with no reluctance.
I argue that, morally speaking, there is no meaningful difference between the monsters and the liberals who enable them. Given that each crime is worthy of the same penalty, death.
Why I said slightly, it's the difference between a serial killer that has killed 4 people and one that's in the double digits, you're both getting the chair anyway but we can say the latter is just a bit more evil.
In a just world, this would be the immediate response to posting that.
It's too stupid that they think they can be that brazen about being pedophiles, no hyperbole. If your argument in anyway contains 'we should show our genitalia to children's as a part of it, your a pedophile and the consequences should range from restraining order to be near kids and on a list to death penalty if you ACTIVELY try to do this.
In a just world, this dumb whore would never even think about anything like this.
I don't actually think this bitch is a pedophile, I think she's, may Allah forgive me for uttering this word, a liberal. (Surprising for a Canadian journo prof with a sideshave, I know.) She'll say whatever is "in" at the moment, and right now, the "in" thing is advocating for trannies to expose themselves to children. If the mainstream did a complete 180, a week later she'd be advocating for all troons to be fed into wood chippers, and she'd never think about it, because she simply does not think at all, about anything, ever. These people are devoid of any curiosity and they're incapable of comparing anything from the past to today, they either never had any capacity to recognize patterns or it's been destroyed, so they just follow instructions. They don't suffer from cognitive dissonance because there's no cognition going on at all.
But normal people don't control the mainstream, so she's not going to start advocating for wood chippers, and she's definitely not going to get rid of that ridiculous haircut and turn into a normal person who isn't a burden on society, so all we can do is the next best thing: cause her and people like her so much pain that they become terrified to open their mouths. They can't be reasoned with, the same way you don't reason with a puppy who shits on your carpet, it's pointless - again, there's no cognition. And it's not shutting down free speech, because these soulless meat automatons never spoke freely in the first place. Sewing their mouths shut, metaphorically or IRL, has only benefits - humanity would lose nothing.
They are only SLIGHTLY less dangerous than the actual predators, no joke. Why, because they enable the predators to operate, these are the parents that TAKE their kids to the drag shows, they actively give/feed them to the demons.
I'd rather go with you're idea of fear and terrified of acting for these people. At least puppies grow into dogs that learn both hierarchy of who's the master and cognitive functions, these people are sheep that would follow the flock onto a highway with no reluctance.
I argue that, morally speaking, there is no meaningful difference between the monsters and the liberals who enable them. Given that each crime is worthy of the same penalty, death.
Why I said slightly, it's the difference between a serial killer that has killed 4 people and one that's in the double digits, you're both getting the chair anyway but we can say the latter is just a bit more evil.