Good incel, bad incel
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
I have a hard time feeling bad for (some) women because they are almost wholly responsible for enabling this shit. It’s a warped version of maternal instincts used for the wrong target, but women “feel bad” internally for these mentally ill men and will fight against normal men and traditional society to allow this bullshit to go on.
Just visit any social media/news posting about the above situation, and I guarantee all the people defending it in the comments will be regular women, or the trans themselves. Men will be the only voice of reason there.
Not only that, but the guy they despise for being unattractive can all the sudden do no wrong the minute he puts a dress on.
That's why for most of history they weren't allowed to have opinions outside the home, let alone vote.
Its not always so innocent. Women also love to create fights and make men fight then sleep with the winner.
Unfortunately there are plenty of brainwashed men to reinforce it as well. Although probably less percentage-wise
The difference is sterility.
Leftism wants fewer humans.
If you think all troons are sterile I have some horror stories for you involving minors.
And pets.
And unsuspecting adults
Fecundity involves meaningful survival.
Dorks can survive; even overcome.
Wankers simply won't. Nor will their ... "families".
If you want sex, do what it takes to get healthy, and desirable enough. When I was a big, fat, party animal, I was beloved. All the girls around me loved me. No one wanted sex with me. Losing the weight, gaining the muscle, getting a hair cut, made a world of difference.
There's limits though. Almost all Incels can have sex, just like femcels have 1000 men messaging them to have sex with. The issue always comes back to "have sex with the right kinds of people". Incels want hot women just like femcels want hot men. This is something that "improving oneself" doesn't always end up doing much for because there's an upper limit to the improvement most people can accomplish. Nature and nurture play key roles and by the time most people are 25yo+, it's pretty much gg. Women have already peaked and men have limited upward mobility. If you're 5'6" at 25yo, you're never going to be 6'4". Obviously, it you were fat you can lose weight but a lot of Incels aren't fat, they just got the shit-end of the genetic lottery with their balding rat-faces that no amount of lifting at the gym will fix.
I'm an Incel so I speak from experience. I go to the gym 4-5 times a week. I'm fit. I play sports. I dress well. I keep up with hygiene practices. Having sex has never been an issue for me. I've just never been able to have sex with women I want to have sex with in the manner I want to have sex with them. Sure, I can also spend $400 and have sex with a hot woman but again, that's not the kind of sex I'm looking for. The kind of sex I want is the kind of sex a hot woman has for "Chad" (a hot man). When she has a desire to please and acts like a nymphomanic because she's dying to jump a guy's dick. No hot woman will ever act that way for me because I am not hot enough, so I am an Incel. I'd rather not have sex than have sex with ugly women by simping for them. I find such an experience disgusting.
If only all men would take this approach we might not have 3's running around acting like 10's.
Good for you for having the self respect to refuse shitty deals. If more men refused to simp the average man would get a fair shake again.
I mean, not really? Not by any legitimate definition. Celibacy is a binary state. But I guess now days Incel is merely an insult that means whatever they want it to mean so sure.
No one is an Incel by the strictest of definitions because anyone can buy a prostitute. I don't care how poor you are, if you live in the west, you can buy a prostitute.
The label "Incel" has always been men who are unable to get sex with women they want to get sex with in the manner in which they want to get sex. Even Elliot Rodger could have had sex if he wanted to but not with the women he wanted to and in the way he wanted to.
I always defined it as a guy who can't get laid without explicitly paying for it via prostitution. Betabux doesn't count since he did "the normal way". You wouldn't qualify under that definition. The attractiveness of the woman is irrelevant as long as he's pulling in an actual woman (ie not a homosexual tranny). Of course these days the term is used to slur anyone who questions the feminist narrative, and everyone who posts here falls under that umbrella.
The incel on the bottom is a lesbian, by the way.
I especially thought it was hilarious when gay men declared access to women for reproduction a "right."
Imagine a mad max world where roving gangs of eunuchs look for women to bear surrogate children while chad gamers protect them.