"Stop noticing reality! Believe our cult!" = the left
Honestly, a lot of these antisemite claims are like the homophones/Transphobic claims of when we go "can you stop showing dicks and other sexual stuff to kids?" and you hear in response "Why do you hate gay/trans!?"
The only difference is unlike the massive self report with the pedo pride movement, a lot of the antisemite shit is a shield for government/deep state activities that if there is Jewish involvement its 5 guys out of 500. If there was a massive Jewish conspiracy, they would've given placebo jabs to Israel..
if there is a Jewish conspiracy, the majority of Jews are not in on it. The Khazarian theory seems to be plausible to me, but I haven't seen any hard evidence of it.
The obvious difference being that there is no shortage of whites criticizing powerful whites while the average Jew responds to criticism of powerful Jews with claims of antisemitism. Extreme solidarity and nepotism are the issues. This is why Jews never fully integrate, and it is also why they tend to “go down with the ship” when powerful Jews receive their comeuppance. Identity politics is a double edged sword.
Keep in mind the media and people telling you that are also the same media and people lying to you about everything else. Most Jews at this point think of the leftists the same way they do nazi collaborators from the second world war, you just don't hear about it.
I would like to hear about this more often, since just about every Jew I know in my personal life leans pretty heavily to the left. We also just don't see a lot in the way of Jews criticizing other Jews. It's so rare that it stands out quite a bit when it does occur.
Converting to Judaism does nothing to protect you or those around you. Trump’s daughter “became a Jew” and he is still called Hitler.
When the “Nazis” refer to Jews, they are obviously talking about the ethnic tribe. The religious tribe is a smokescreen. Most of the Jews subverting and destroying the West are atheists.
But even ethnic Jews who act against the interests of the Democratic Party get mercilessly attacked. Sheldon Adleson is an example. Somehow, mentioning George Soros makes you an anti-semite (because he supports Democrats), but all of them attacking Sheldon Adleson doesn't.
Judaism is matrilineal. By their law if your Mother was a Jew you are a Jew even if you aren't part of the religion whatsoever, and vice versa with converting.
You seem to be under a very ignorant belief that being a Jew is only a religion. When the vast majority of Jews criticized are non-practicing and probably so far removed from their religion its basically a joke. They are Jewish by phenotype and bloodline too, which is why you can literally name off physical characteristics cliche to them.
Most of those Elite were just born that way. They didn't convert and they have extreme nepotism/in-group biases to only want people "like them" around them. This isn't a trait unique to them, its found in literally all humans. Its only a problem because for complex reasons some Jews got to the top and then just stayed there propagating the issue wider and wider.
I suppose larger noses and afros just cease to exist because it would be mean to talk about it and Jews are the literal only group of people in history to not be effected by genetics. Mother Nature isn't anti-semitic afterall, so she wouldn't want to be mean.
And of course social groups never have strong inward biases that keep them from seeking mates outside their group, creating phenotypes that end up congruent with said group at all.
It's a bunch of Leftists pretending to be jews without actually being jewish.
Well you should get on changing actual Jewish law about matrilineal inheritance then. And then get the suspiciously large amount of high level government employees and Hollywood writers/actors/producers to hand in their cards and stop speaking as one.
I'm not opposed to that as most actual practicing religious Jews seem to be alright people, but its amazing how much extra effort and loops you'll tie yourselves in to pretend there isn't an issue to be had.
You started with "jewish phenotype" and backed down to "a population might have a different facial structure." Thank you for conceding the point that there is no such thing as a jewish phenotype, there never was, and there never will be.
Well you should get on changing actual Jewish law about matrilineal inheritance then
Good, then we agree that it's impossible for there to be an isolated jewish genetic block, because a Bronze Age religion isn't capable of understanding genetics, or that genetics isn't only passed down by fathers.
you'll tie yourselves in
I'm an anti-theist, not a jew.
to pretend there isn't an issue to be had.
Leftists using jews as a human shield to deflect criticism is always an issue, I don't go around blaming jews for being bullet sponges, same way I don't blame women for being bullet sponges for feminists, or laborers for being bullet sponges for unions, nor germans for national socialists, nor white for klansmen.
Yes, that's literally what a fucking phenotype is:
In genetics, the phenotype is the set of observable characteristics or traits of an organism
A facial structure is an observable characteristic, you donkey. As is your hair growing a certain way.
because a Bronze Age religion isn't capable of understanding genetics, or that genetics isn't only passed down by fathers.
Damn, I didn't know it took Modern Science and a 110 IQ to think up "marry this person, they are one of our people" for a prolonged period of time long enough to create distinguishable ethnic groups. I suppose we truly are all One Human Race™ with no differences ever, else it might imply something neutral about the Jews.
It truly is amazing how people who have at least a base level of intellect suddenly will debase themselves to gibbering retards just to try and wade into protecting da Jooz from people daring to point out they exist.
A facial structure is an observable characteristic, you donkey. As is your hair growing a certain way.
Good. Then there are how many hundreds of millions of phenotypes are there? After all, a set of observable characteristics in an organism is effectively an infinite number of categories.
In fact, since we've created a phenotype based on religion, there'd also, have to be a muslim phenotype too. Islam has lots of restrictions on breeding (even to the point of inbreeding in many places). There simply must be a Muslim phenotype at that point. That should be interesting because the muslim phenotype would have to be shared between both arabs and indonesians.
Damn, I didn't know it took Modern Science and a 110 IQ to think up "marry this person, they are one of our people" for a prolonged period of time long enough to create distinguishable ethnic groups. I suppose we truly are all One Human Race™ with no differences ever, else it might imply something neutral about the Jews.
Stop making up an argument when you realize yours doesn't work.
You can't have a genetically isolated population that is isolated by segregating itself to one parent sex, because your tribe incorrectly assumed that inherited traits are passed down by males alone.
And don't try to conflate a human phenotype grouping to an ethnic group, which are inherently cultural constructs. Ethnic groups fall within and across genetic phenotypes. You can see that is especially true among tribal peoples like the Mohawk and the Seneca, or the Hutu and the Tutsi.
It truly is amazing how people who have at least a base level of intellect suddenly will debase themselves to gibbering retards just to try and wade into protecting da Jooz from people daring to point out they exist
It might be more amazing to point out that people with a base level of intellect will suddenly debase themselves and start insulting people and screaming that anyone who disagrees with must be a jew, just because they point out that a religion is a religion, and not a phenotype.
What’s the statistic for married First Children again? Is it 9/9 of them who married jews or just 9/10 now?
But I do agree, they are the ultimate Scapegoat/Kapparot Chicken for a far darker element hidden within them, using their masses as a bloody red shield (roth-shilde):
They’re willing in the same sense your libtarded family member / childhood friend is willingly supporting it. Slightly different obviously but quite similar in most cases - it’s just indoctrination but they get fed it from all sides (parents school religion friendgroup etc) where as the rest of us just get it from a subset of those
I see this as an elite pipe-dream, like AI; or like transhumanism.
No, AI is not the machine god that will end all of humanity and cause a loss of 100% of all jobs in an economy.
No, Transhumanism will not lead to the abolition of death, as all consciousnesses are uploaded into a computer.
No, a true ethnic or race based bio-weapon is not possible because the categories themselves are primarily cultural, guaranteeing that even if you could create one, you would get vast sums of other people being slaughtered. Sometimes, that's even intentional.
We actually see this all the time in genocides, ethnic cleansings, and racialist laws. Boundary conditions and "edge-cases" are exceedingly common. The Jim Crow laws in the South were absolutely all over the place in who did or didn't count as white, including one case in Mississippi where a Japanese family was declared white. The man who drafted the Nuremburg Laws had objections to the Holocaust as there was a ton of debate about who's "blood" was German enough, who's "blood" was too Jewish, and where children could be more German depending on how breeding control was set up. In Rawanda, despite it being a very clear ethnic distinction between Hutu and Tutsi, the genocide ended up murdering many of both because some Tutsi were living in Hutu communities and were considered guilty enough, or again, there were questions about inter-breeding, so they got killed anyway. Or sometimes the Tutsi were culturally similar to the surrounding Hutu. I've had to argue about this before, but even Israel's right of return is not a simple genetic test, and it never has been. That's one part of a larger examination about whom you married, if you've converted, and many other issues; that Leftist jews are trying to secularize (because if the Rightists & Orthodox won, they'd be denied re-entry into the country and citizenship).
It ends up not being possible to make a biological distinction among cultural categories.
"Stop noticing reality! Believe our cult!" = the left
Honestly, a lot of these antisemite claims are like the homophones/Transphobic claims of when we go "can you stop showing dicks and other sexual stuff to kids?" and you hear in response "Why do you hate gay/trans!?"
The only difference is unlike the massive self report with the pedo pride movement, a lot of the antisemite shit is a shield for government/deep state activities that if there is Jewish involvement its 5 guys out of 500. If there was a massive Jewish conspiracy, they would've given placebo jabs to Israel..
if there is a Jewish conspiracy, the majority of Jews are not in on it. The Khazarian theory seems to be plausible to me, but I haven't seen any hard evidence of it.
Pretty much same with EVERY group except the real predators like pedos, sadists and people who increase taxes.
Whenever they say whites control everything, Jews, Chinese etc it's an extreme minority that do and should be defined by class than race.
The obvious difference being that there is no shortage of whites criticizing powerful whites while the average Jew responds to criticism of powerful Jews with claims of antisemitism. Extreme solidarity and nepotism are the issues. This is why Jews never fully integrate, and it is also why they tend to “go down with the ship” when powerful Jews receive their comeuppance. Identity politics is a double edged sword.
Keep in mind the media and people telling you that are also the same media and people lying to you about everything else. Most Jews at this point think of the leftists the same way they do nazi collaborators from the second world war, you just don't hear about it.
I would like to hear about this more often, since just about every Jew I know in my personal life leans pretty heavily to the left. We also just don't see a lot in the way of Jews criticizing other Jews. It's so rare that it stands out quite a bit when it does occur.
Viva Frei and Glenn Greenwald actually spend time calling out ridiculous claims of anti Semitism. One of the reasons that I like them.
Frame Games remains the actual gold standard as far as I'm concerned, but I'm probably the only one here who even saw his content before he vanished.
There's less jews in the whole world than there are people in most major cities. I'm not surprised you don't see a lot of internal politics.
Converting to Judaism does nothing to protect you or those around you. Trump’s daughter “became a Jew” and he is still called Hitler.
When the “Nazis” refer to Jews, they are obviously talking about the ethnic tribe. The religious tribe is a smokescreen. Most of the Jews subverting and destroying the West are atheists.
But even ethnic Jews who act against the interests of the Democratic Party get mercilessly attacked. Sheldon Adleson is an example. Somehow, mentioning George Soros makes you an anti-semite (because he supports Democrats), but all of them attacking Sheldon Adleson doesn't.
Judaism is matrilineal. By their law if your Mother was a Jew you are a Jew even if you aren't part of the religion whatsoever, and vice versa with converting.
You seem to be under a very ignorant belief that being a Jew is only a religion. When the vast majority of Jews criticized are non-practicing and probably so far removed from their religion its basically a joke. They are Jewish by phenotype and bloodline too, which is why you can literally name off physical characteristics cliche to them.
Most of those Elite were just born that way. They didn't convert and they have extreme nepotism/in-group biases to only want people "like them" around them. This isn't a trait unique to them, its found in literally all humans. Its only a problem because for complex reasons some Jews got to the top and then just stayed there propagating the issue wider and wider.
That's because it is religious. There is no jewish phenotype.
Phenotypes are not homogenous cultural or social groups.
Yeah, it's a big problem. It's a bunch of Leftists pretending to be jews without actually being jewish. I like to think of it as Jew-Face
I suppose larger noses and afros just cease to exist because it would be mean to talk about it and Jews are the literal only group of people in history to not be effected by genetics. Mother Nature isn't anti-semitic afterall, so she wouldn't want to be mean.
And of course social groups never have strong inward biases that keep them from seeking mates outside their group, creating phenotypes that end up congruent with said group at all.
Well you should get on changing actual Jewish law about matrilineal inheritance then. And then get the suspiciously large amount of high level government employees and Hollywood writers/actors/producers to hand in their cards and stop speaking as one.
I'm not opposed to that as most actual practicing religious Jews seem to be alright people, but its amazing how much extra effort and loops you'll tie yourselves in to pretend there isn't an issue to be had.
You started with "jewish phenotype" and backed down to "a population might have a different facial structure." Thank you for conceding the point that there is no such thing as a jewish phenotype, there never was, and there never will be.
Good, then we agree that it's impossible for there to be an isolated jewish genetic block, because a Bronze Age religion isn't capable of understanding genetics, or that genetics isn't only passed down by fathers.
I'm an anti-theist, not a jew.
Leftists using jews as a human shield to deflect criticism is always an issue, I don't go around blaming jews for being bullet sponges, same way I don't blame women for being bullet sponges for feminists, or laborers for being bullet sponges for unions, nor germans for national socialists, nor white for klansmen.
Yes, that's literally what a fucking phenotype is:
A facial structure is an observable characteristic, you donkey. As is your hair growing a certain way.
Damn, I didn't know it took Modern Science and a 110 IQ to think up "marry this person, they are one of our people" for a prolonged period of time long enough to create distinguishable ethnic groups. I suppose we truly are all One Human Race™ with no differences ever, else it might imply something neutral about the Jews.
It truly is amazing how people who have at least a base level of intellect suddenly will debase themselves to gibbering retards just to try and wade into protecting da Jooz from people daring to point out they exist.
Good. Then there are how many hundreds of millions of phenotypes are there? After all, a set of observable characteristics in an organism is effectively an infinite number of categories.
In fact, since we've created a phenotype based on religion, there'd also, have to be a muslim phenotype too. Islam has lots of restrictions on breeding (even to the point of inbreeding in many places). There simply must be a Muslim phenotype at that point. That should be interesting because the muslim phenotype would have to be shared between both arabs and indonesians.
Stop making up an argument when you realize yours doesn't work.
You can't have a genetically isolated population that is isolated by segregating itself to one parent sex, because your tribe incorrectly assumed that inherited traits are passed down by males alone.
And don't try to conflate a human phenotype grouping to an ethnic group, which are inherently cultural constructs. Ethnic groups fall within and across genetic phenotypes. You can see that is especially true among tribal peoples like the Mohawk and the Seneca, or the Hutu and the Tutsi.
It might be more amazing to point out that people with a base level of intellect will suddenly debase themselves and start insulting people and screaming that anyone who disagrees with must be a jew, just because they point out that a religion is a religion, and not a phenotype.
>Jewish conversion rate
What’s the statistic for married First Children again? Is it 9/9 of them who married jews or just 9/10 now?
But I do agree, they are the ultimate Scapegoat/Kapparot Chicken for a far darker element hidden within them, using their masses as a bloody red shield (roth-shilde):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoat
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapparot#
Using their willing masses.
They’re willing in the same sense your libtarded family member / childhood friend is willingly supporting it. Slightly different obviously but quite similar in most cases - it’s just indoctrination but they get fed it from all sides (parents school religion friendgroup etc) where as the rest of us just get it from a subset of those
Couldn't just come up with a creative insinuation? Cowardly as it is, shit's not worth it in the higher echelons of discussion.
buzzwords really are all they have, aren't they?
I see this as an elite pipe-dream, like AI; or like transhumanism.
No, AI is not the machine god that will end all of humanity and cause a loss of 100% of all jobs in an economy.
No, Transhumanism will not lead to the abolition of death, as all consciousnesses are uploaded into a computer.
No, a true ethnic or race based bio-weapon is not possible because the categories themselves are primarily cultural, guaranteeing that even if you could create one, you would get vast sums of other people being slaughtered. Sometimes, that's even intentional.
We actually see this all the time in genocides, ethnic cleansings, and racialist laws. Boundary conditions and "edge-cases" are exceedingly common. The Jim Crow laws in the South were absolutely all over the place in who did or didn't count as white, including one case in Mississippi where a Japanese family was declared white. The man who drafted the Nuremburg Laws had objections to the Holocaust as there was a ton of debate about who's "blood" was German enough, who's "blood" was too Jewish, and where children could be more German depending on how breeding control was set up. In Rawanda, despite it being a very clear ethnic distinction between Hutu and Tutsi, the genocide ended up murdering many of both because some Tutsi were living in Hutu communities and were considered guilty enough, or again, there were questions about inter-breeding, so they got killed anyway. Or sometimes the Tutsi were culturally similar to the surrounding Hutu. I've had to argue about this before, but even Israel's right of return is not a simple genetic test, and it never has been. That's one part of a larger examination about whom you married, if you've converted, and many other issues; that Leftist jews are trying to secularize (because if the Rightists & Orthodox won, they'd be denied re-entry into the country and citizenship).
It ends up not being possible to make a biological distinction among cultural categories.