When I saw the article's title I had plenty of answers, like blue pillers not realizing that sex and relationships are always transactional if you're not Chad or Tyrone, or leftist men being willing to put up with the schizophrenic attitude feminists have towards prostitution (women selling is good but men buying is bad), but the first sentence threw all of that out the window:
Four months before Violet, a 25-year-old transsexual...
Okay, so we're talking about a tranny. That changes things quite dramatically. Now watch the article continue as if this isn't extremely relevant.
“What if I put it out there that I’m available as a sex worker for people I know for highly discounted rates?”
You won't have any takers because even in leftist circles men who are willing to fuck gay men in drag are rare.
“They’re young, they’re millennials or zoomers and they don’t need to pay for sex work because they can just go on an app,”
That's true if they're Chads, but even in that case it's often worth it to pay and avoid the inevitable bullshit that comes with the territory of getting laid for "free".
Milrod has a therapy client who is emotionally “tortured by” paying trans women for sex, even though he keeps going back for more. “‘Oh my god, I’m assaulting them,’” Milrod says, describing his line of thinking. “And that’s because his mother drilled into him that women have the same rights as men — that he needs to be a ‘good’ feminist.”
A rare look into the mind of a degenerate tranny fucker. They're even more pathetic than we thought.
Brad had only ever been with cisgender women, he told me. I was his first. Knowing this, I checked in with him multiple times throughout the night to make sure his heterosexual ego was still intact. I couldn’t help but feel the whole latte flirtation and wine date was a charade to bed me, secure his shemale fantasy and then return to his cis girlfriend.
So there's this thing called shame. Brad is a degenerate tranny fucker, but at least he knows how fucked up his his fetish is and he's properly ashamed of it. His sense of shame tells him to keep his disgusting behavior private. This is a foreign concept to trannies because they wouldn't be trannies if they were capable of shame.
both the author and the subject of the article are trannies.
moderates and conservatives don't want this shit. and anyone who has paid attention for even 5 seconds know the left is all talk, no action. look at all the videos of lefties saying we need to take in refugees and illegal aliens, and then the interviewer says "oh, here we have mugabi, straight from somalia, can he live with you?" and the leftie is fucking mortified.
they don't believe what they're saying. we know it. they know it. and they know we know it.
trying to find someone who would be willing to be a friend and a client is asking for the impossible.
Good point, but I don't think it's that cut and dry. I have female acquaintances that are real women, and the offer would be tempting if the price was right. I'd never do it for the reasons you explain, but a man thinking with the wrong head might not have the self control to refuse. Of course it's a non-issue when you're dealing with a tranny.
Yeah, I considered posting that in my comment, but I had to be selective to keep the length reasonable and it didn't make the cut. He's a fag and he'll fuck anything so this doesn't really apply to him, but when real women say shit like this it's the most obvious example of the halo effect that you can find out in the wild. It's amazing how womanese translates 6 foot 3 buff guy with attractive facial features to "emotionally sensitive".
There's a famous movie in anthropology circles about transgenders selling themselves in the islands of Samoa. The movie says they are part of a tradition called Fafafine, and Samoans accept them.
Fafafine is when a woman has too many sons, and chooses one to help with the chores. It literally means Woman's Work.
Well, it's just that it seemed like you were making a general statement about elderly Johns, but then wrote about them paying for men. I really don't think that there are a lot of people in the world that fall in that category, so seeing a generalized statement just seems odd.
Or red pilled men who don't have the looks to obtain casual sex and decide to get the best deal they can since they're in the pay to play market regardless.
I imagine after a while blow jobs aren't enough, and who wants to fuck a man in the ass if you're not a homo . . . even if the impersonation is attractive, the anus must still be confronted when the rubber meets the road.
I rather doubt that a fake vagina fashioned out of a man's colon is a very appetizing target in the heat of battle . . . it would probably deflate even the most intense erection.
Just occurred to me if you put your Johnson in a colon-gina it's still ass-fucking . . . just in a different spot north of the original.
Disregarding the trans thing. Let's say this was a girl throwing out the same offer. Most dudes are still not going to take up that offer because they don't want transactional sex. I would wager the the amount of guys that directly pay for sex is stasticially below 50%.
The weird logic at play in this article would be like if your friend sold pool accessories and offered you a discount and got mad when you go "nah, I dont have a pool so it would be useless to me," because you're not supporting their business.
Do they… REALLY need to have the difference between “I tolerate X” or even “I’m totally cool with it if you’re into X or do X” and “I’m into X myself”?
There isn't enough gasoline to douse this article in.
You think Ukraine might lend us one of those cluster bombs?
Holy promethium will work better, brother.
When I saw the article's title I had plenty of answers, like blue pillers not realizing that sex and relationships are always transactional if you're not Chad or Tyrone, or leftist men being willing to put up with the schizophrenic attitude feminists have towards prostitution (women selling is good but men buying is bad), but the first sentence threw all of that out the window:
Okay, so we're talking about a tranny. That changes things quite dramatically. Now watch the article continue as if this isn't extremely relevant.
You won't have any takers because even in leftist circles men who are willing to fuck gay men in drag are rare.
That's true if they're Chads, but even in that case it's often worth it to pay and avoid the inevitable bullshit that comes with the territory of getting laid for "free".
A rare look into the mind of a degenerate tranny fucker. They're even more pathetic than we thought.
So there's this thing called shame. Brad is a degenerate tranny fucker, but at least he knows how fucked up his his fetish is and he's properly ashamed of it. His sense of shame tells him to keep his disgusting behavior private. This is a foreign concept to trannies because they wouldn't be trannies if they were capable of shame.
both the author and the subject of the article are trannies.
moderates and conservatives don't want this shit. and anyone who has paid attention for even 5 seconds know the left is all talk, no action. look at all the videos of lefties saying we need to take in refugees and illegal aliens, and then the interviewer says "oh, here we have mugabi, straight from somalia, can he live with you?" and the leftie is fucking mortified.
they don't believe what they're saying. we know it. they know it. and they know we know it.
Good point, but I don't think it's that cut and dry. I have female acquaintances that are real women, and the offer would be tempting if the price was right. I'd never do it for the reasons you explain, but a man thinking with the wrong head might not have the self control to refuse. Of course it's a non-issue when you're dealing with a tranny.
I would not be a friend-client to any prostitute, not a real woman nor the Impossible Woman™ variety
For the NPCs, yes. The rest say whatever gives them the most power in that very moment.
LMAO
Yeah, I considered posting that in my comment, but I had to be selective to keep the length reasonable and it didn't make the cut. He's a fag and he'll fuck anything so this doesn't really apply to him, but when real women say shit like this it's the most obvious example of the halo effect that you can find out in the wild. It's amazing how womanese translates 6 foot 3 buff guy with attractive facial features to "emotionally sensitive".
The author might spontaneously-combust from the sheer magnitude of his flamming faggotry.
My God the degeneracy needs to be purged.
lmao "Please fuck me I'll give you a discount"
[EDIT] I should have waited
That's not a positive descriptor.
There's a famous movie in anthropology circles about transgenders selling themselves in the islands of Samoa. The movie says they are part of a tradition called Fafafine, and Samoans accept them.
Fafafine is when a woman has too many sons, and chooses one to help with the chores. It literally means Woman's Work.
That's all I could think about when reading this.
I didn't finish reading it because it was boring.
However, let me be clear:
the vast majority of dudes paying for men are old
why? simple:
old people have more money
old people can't get young pussy on Tinder so they gotta pay
simple as
Dudes paying for men?
I got mixed up but yes, the article tranny is a man. I should have written for #2
Well, it's just that it seemed like you were making a general statement about elderly Johns, but then wrote about them paying for men. I really don't think that there are a lot of people in the world that fall in that category, so seeing a generalized statement just seems odd.
Or red pilled men who don't have the looks to obtain casual sex and decide to get the best deal they can since they're in the pay to play market regardless.
FFS - just get a fucking real job you fucking tranny leech
Yeah, but only in a female dominated field. It shouldn't be allowed to infest the good jobs and destroy them.
I imagine after a while blow jobs aren't enough, and who wants to fuck a man in the ass if you're not a homo . . . even if the impersonation is attractive, the anus must still be confronted when the rubber meets the road.
I rather doubt that a fake vagina fashioned out of a man's colon is a very appetizing target in the heat of battle . . . it would probably deflate even the most intense erection.
Just occurred to me if you put your Johnson in a colon-gina it's still ass-fucking . . . just in a different spot north of the original.
Even the blowjobs are gay. Once a man lets another dude suck him off he's already crossed the Rubicon.
Of course, but suspension of disbelief is possible if the guy looks feminine enough.
Because leftists don't actually have money. They have to get it from hand outs.
Disregarding the trans thing. Let's say this was a girl throwing out the same offer. Most dudes are still not going to take up that offer because they don't want transactional sex. I would wager the the amount of guys that directly pay for sex is stasticially below 50%.
The weird logic at play in this article would be like if your friend sold pool accessories and offered you a discount and got mad when you go "nah, I dont have a pool so it would be useless to me," because you're not supporting their business.
Do they… REALLY need to have the difference between “I tolerate X” or even “I’m totally cool with it if you’re into X or do X” and “I’m into X myself”?
Posters in their 20s… is that what ALL dating is like nowadays or is it just the SJWs?