CDC's Walenksy Knew Vaccines Didn't Stop Infections in January 2021 But Still Told Americans "Vaccinated People Do Not Carry the...
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky knew that Covid vaccines did not stop infections in January 2021 but continued to claim they did and promote policies based on it, a newly released email reveals.
Caught in a lie, the con artist, especially one who is a public employee/figure, must double-down on her grift or admit the fact that she was conning you in the first place. That ends the game.
On top of that, the worst thing a politician thinks he can do is reverse himself. God forbid he's accused of indecision or "waffling."
It's idiotic and infantile. And because our leaders wanted to avoid looking wrong or indecisive, we suffered everything that followed from this ridiculous public hysteria led by liars and rich pigs and managed by whores.
I'm always frustrated by this bullshit, because it's stuff we all knew, and it's ridiculously frustrating that it took this long to get official confirmation, it's frustrating that it's in any way exciting, but mostly it's frustrating because...nothing will happen, and people won't even care.
This is almost meaningless, aside from another little gotcha...from the side that was right about everything anyway, and will be ignored by the mainstream regardless.
It's truth laundering, to avoid angry mobs. The reality that everybody instinctually knows is that the people responsible (who know this most keenly) should probably face a firing squad. But if by degrees they can get back to acknowledging the obvious truth without ever acknowledging the wrongness of their actions, they can reconstruct a new warped reality where nobody did anything wrong. 'So what if she knew vaccines didn't stop transmission? Everyone always knew that. Vaccines have never been about stopping transmission.'
Even this reveal is a reveal of limited liability since she's admitting to knowing about 'breakthrough infections', which in the context of covid is another fiction. There is no real world data in any highly vaxxed country that suggests there was ever any protection to 'break through'. But if you talk about the mRNA jabs failure to stop transmission in terms of 'breakthrough infections' you can pretend that there was, and that vaxxed transmission was rare at some point. So all that's happened is that behind the scenes she was caught sharing one of their popular fictions which doesn't quite match the timeline of their more public fictions, but was still nevertheless a popular fiction afterwards. None of it the truth.
"Breakthrough"
The entire Covid & injection argument was rhetorical and semantic only.
Even when it comes to the actual scientific data, most of the studies were not falsified or fabricated. They said exactly the truth: the injections did little except potentially reduce hospitalizations. Masks were damaging. The lockdowns were utterly destructive. There was never any debate even needed. The entire scam was simply about spinning rhetoric and semantics to create a world wide moral panic.
Waluigi
Because she, and everybody else in a senior position at the CDC, is a monstrous liar.
Because, like all narrative shills, she's a liar. Most things she says aren't honestly held opinions but carefully curated lies. They may not all be scripted lies, but she knows well the range of opinions she's allowed to hold, and clings to those desperately, regardless of any true information that may pass her desk.
When caught in a lie? Double down. When that doesn't work? The information has changed. The science has changed. Trust the lying authority. Trust the finely crafted, predetermined science.
Lies are truth, and truth are lies, comrade.
If we had a real opposition party instead of the DNC owned GOP they'd be hauling these big pharma ghouls in and asking them to explain why they shouldn't be arrested for lying under oath at all the previous hearings.
Because in the world of politics, optics are more important than facts.
Why? I guess money. I don't know if she gained any form of power from this, but that would be my second guess.
I still want to know what was really in the mystery juice and why they wanted it in everyone.
The injections only inject CRISPR to create the spike protein.
They weren't tested by Pfizer to prevent transmission because there was no mechanism to prevent transmission in the injection. The best study I ever saw was that injecting people with the spike protein would allow the body to be able to partially fight off more of the virus without having to deal with the effects of the spike protein at the same time: reducing viral load by 30% if you were infected by the correct strain. New strains emerge all the time, and generally the injections were never going to last more than 3 months.
They knew this from the beginning.
Why? Because I knew this from the beginning, because I read their studies.
Uh, what? They no doubt used CRISPR in development but they didn't "inject CRISPR" into people.
The part about no mechanism is because the nose and throat are essentially a separate immune system and so injected vaccines won't prevent a head cold.
Recently vaccinated people still with temporary immunity to internal covid infection would go around with a sniffly nose or sore throat spreading covid.
That's not as I understand it. What do you understand the injection to be?
It's just mRNA inside a lipid shell. Lipid shell makes contact with the cell membrane and merges like two soap bubbles.
The main CRISPR protein Cas9 is huge at 3x larger than average protein. They didn't jam it into a bubble along with instructions when all they needed was the mRNA.
The mRNA is all you need, it's purpose in the cell is to make proteins. What they did do is use methylated Uradine which limits the cell's normal process of destroying mRNA after it's used so cell keeps making lots and lots of spikes instead of just one or a few copies.
Oooohkay I see my confusion here. The mRNA itself is what was manufacturing the spike proteins, correct?
Yes normally when the cell wants to make any protein it copies the instructions from DNA in the nucleus into mRNA, the mRNA instructions go out into the main part of the cell, find a ribosome which manufactures the protein, and then the cell destroys the mRNA because it only wants one of the protein not a million of them.
So the pfizer/moderna is just mRNA instructions to make spike protein, except with unnatural tweaks to make them keep producing it over and over again. This is one of the main problems with the technology itself and means you can't predict the dose an individual gets, the other big problem being the nanolipids will merge with and reprogram any cell anywhere in the body.
Of course it's never that simple because retroviruses have given us the 'ability' to go backwards from mRNA back into DNA and somehow parts of the vaccines get inserted into at least liver cells' DNA. It's easy to believe they did this on purpose, but could just be unfortunate chance.
CRISPR is a tool from bacteria that can chop pieces of DNA into parts based on a program. So it's used a lot in research to manipulate DNA, like at Wuhan to chop parts from one virus and add them to another one to make a frankenvirus.
MPH degrees were a mistake.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x2)
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Stop being a psycho.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x2)
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Again, stop being a psycho.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Fuck this, don't come back.
Everyone in this town is drunk on kool aid.